Literature DB >> 33583267

Combining data assimilation and machine learning to infer unresolved scale parametrization.

Julien Brajard1,2, Alberto Carrassi3,4, Marc Bocquet5, Laurent Bertino1.   

Abstract

In recent years, machine learning (ML) has been proposed to devise data-driven parametrizations of unresolved processes in dynamical numerical models. In most cases, the ML training leverages high-resolution simulations to provide a dense, noiseless target state. Our goal is to go beyond the use of high-resolution simulations and train ML-based parametrization using direct data, in the realistic scenario of noisy and sparse observations. The algorithm proposed in this work is a two-step process. First, data assimilation (DA) techniques are applied to estimate the full state of the system from a truncated model. The unresolved part of the truncated model is viewed as a model error in the DA system. In a second step, ML is used to emulate the unresolved part, a predictor of model error given the state of the system. Finally, the ML-based parametrization model is added to the physical core truncated model to produce a hybrid model. The DA component of the proposed method relies on an ensemble Kalman filter while the ML parametrization is represented by a neural network. The approach is applied to the two-scale Lorenz model and to MAOOAM, a reduced-order coupled ocean-atmosphere model. We show that in both cases, the hybrid model yields forecasts with better skill than the truncated model. Moreover, the attractor of the system is significantly better represented by the hybrid model than by the truncated model. This article is part of the theme issue 'Machine learning for weather and climate modelling'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data assimilation; machine learning; numerical modelling

Year:  2021        PMID: 33583267      PMCID: PMC7898132          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  5 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Steven L Brunton; Joshua L Proctor; J Nathan Kutz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Model-Free Prediction of Large Spatiotemporally Chaotic Systems from Data: A Reservoir Computing Approach.

Authors:  Jaideep Pathak; Brian Hunt; Michelle Girvan; Zhixin Lu; Edward Ott
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models.

Authors:  Stephan Rasp; Michael S Pritchard; Pierre Gentine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Satellite-based time-series of sea-surface temperature since 1981 for climate applications.

Authors:  Christopher J Merchant; Owen Embury; Claire E Bulgin; Thomas Block; Gary K Corlett; Emma Fiedler; Simon A Good; Jonathan Mittaz; Nick A Rayner; David Berry; Steinar Eastwood; Michael Taylor; Yoko Tsushima; Alison Waterfall; Ruth Wilson; Craig Donlon
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.444

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Learning PDE to Model Self-Organization of Matter.

Authors:  Eduardo Brandao; Jean-Philippe Colombier; Stefan Duffner; Rémi Emonet; Florence Garrelie; Amaury Habrard; François Jacquenet; Anthony Nakhoul; Marc Sebban
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.