Literature DB >> 33583262

Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling.

K Kashinath1, M Mustafa1, A Albert1,2, J-L Wu1,3, C Jiang1,4, S Esmaeilzadeh5, K Azizzadenesheli6, R Wang1,7, A Chattopadhyay1,8, A Singh1,2, A Manepalli1,2, D Chirila9, R Yu7, R Walters10, B White2, H Xiao11, H A Tchelepi5, P Marcus4, A Anandkumar3,12, P Hassanzadeh8.   

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) provides novel and powerful ways of accurately and efficiently recognizing complex patterns, emulating nonlinear dynamics, and predicting the spatio-temporal evolution of weather and climate processes. Off-the-shelf ML models, however, do not necessarily obey the fundamental governing laws of physical systems, nor do they generalize well to scenarios on which they have not been trained. We survey systematic approaches to incorporating physics and domain knowledge into ML models and distill these approaches into broad categories. Through 10 case studies, we show how these approaches have been used successfully for emulating, downscaling, and forecasting weather and climate processes. The accomplishments of these studies include greater physical consistency, reduced training time, improved data efficiency, and better generalization. Finally, we synthesize the lessons learned and identify scientific, diagnostic, computational, and resource challenges for developing truly robust and reliable physics-informed ML models for weather and climate processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Machine learning for weather and climate modelling'.

Keywords:  neural networks; physical constraints; physics-informed machine learning; turbulent flows; weather and climate modeling

Year:  2021        PMID: 33583262     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  2 in total

1.  Multi-fidelity information fusion with concatenated neural networks.

Authors:  Suraj Pawar; Omer San; Prakash Vedula; Adil Rasheed; Trond Kvamsdal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Prior Knowledge for Predictive Modeling: The Case of Acute Aquatic Toxicity.

Authors:  Gulnara Shavalieva; Stavros Papadokonstantakis; Gregory Peters
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.162

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.