Literature DB >> 33583225

The visual time analog scale: simple, novel measurement approach to assess pain in patients with chronic pain.

Akiko Okifuji1, Reiko Mitsunaga1, Yuri Kida1, Gary W Donaldson1.   

Abstract

Aim: We conducted a preliminary evaluation of a newly developed, time-based visual time analog (VITA) scale for measuring pain in chronic pain patients. Materials & methods: 40 patients with chronic back pain rated their pain over four visits using numerical (pain) rating scale (NRS) and VITA assessing pain intensity by distributing the amount of time spent on 'not aware of pain' (blue), 'aware of nothing but pain' (red) and time in between (yellow).
Results: The NRS scores were correlated with the VITA Red but not with VITA Blue. The psychometric analyses revealed that VITA achieved greater reliability and sensitivity than did NRS.
Conclusion: The results provide preliminary support for VITA scale for assessing pain intensity in patients with chronic pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pain; pain scale; psychometrics; reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33583225      PMCID: PMC8656341          DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2020-0036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Manag        ISSN: 1758-1869


  17 in total

1.  Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach by P. de Boeck and M. Wilson and Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models by A. Skrondal and S. Rabe-Hesketh.

Authors:  Jay Verkuilen
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.

Authors:  Amelia Williamson; Barbara Hoggart
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Dimensions of "unidimensional" ratings of pain and emotions in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Alexa Huber; Anna Lisa Suman; Carmela Anna Rendo; Giovanni Biasi; Roberto Marcolongo; Giancarlo Carli
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 4.  Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Peter M Fayers; Dagny F Haugen; Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey W Hanks; Jon H Loge; Robin Fainsinger; Nina Aass; Stein Kaasa
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Simple pain rating scales hide complex idiosyncratic meanings.

Authors:  Amanda C de Williams; Huw Talfryn Oakley Davies; Yasmin Chadury
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 6.  Cognitive-processing bias in chronic pain: a review and integration.

Authors:  T Pincus; S Morley
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement.

Authors:  Gary Donaldson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  The dimensions of pain: a multidimensional scaling comparison of cancer patients and healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Crawford W Clark; Theresa Ferrer-Brechner; Malvin N Janal; Douglas J Carroll; Joseph C Yang
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care.

Authors:  Erin E Krebs; Timothy S Carey; Morris Weinberger
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Does self-perception of sensitivity to pain correlate with actual sensitivity to experimental pain?

Authors:  Doron Meiselles; Joshua Aviram; Erica Suzan; Dorit Pud; Elon Eisenberg
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.