Literature DB >> 33583151

Diagnosing odontogenic sinusitis: An international multidisciplinary consensus statement.

John R Craig1, David M Poetker2,3, Umut Aksoy3,4, Fabiana Allevi5, Federico Biglioli6, Bruce Y Cha6, Matteo Chiapasco7, Jerome R Lechien8, Ahmad Safadi9, Regimantas Simuntis10, Roderick Tataryn11,12, Tiziano Testori13,14,15, Matthias Troeltzsch16, Saulius Vaitkus17, Hidenori Yokoi18, Giovanni Felisati19, Alberto M Saibene19.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic sinusitis (ODS) is distinct from non-odontogenic rhinosinusitis, and often requires multidisciplinary collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental providers to make the diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to develop international multidisciplinary consensus on diagnosing ODS.
METHODS: A modified Delphi method was used to assess for expert consensus on diagnosing bacterial ODS. A multidisciplinary panel of 17 authors with ODS expertise from 8 countries (8 otolaryngologists, 9 dental specialists) was assembled. Each author completed 2 of 3 surveys (2 specialty-specific, and 1 for all authors). Thirty-seven clinical statements were created, focusing on 4 important diagnostic components: suspecting ODS; confirming sinusitis in ODS; confirming different dental pathologies causing ODS; and multidisciplinary collaborative aspects of diagnosing ODS. Target audiences were all otolaryngologists and dental providers.
RESULTS: Of the 37 clinical statements, 36 reached consensus or strong consensus, and 1 reached no consensus. Strong consensus was reached that certain clinical and microbiologic features should arouse suspicion for ODS, and that multidisciplinary collaboration between otolaryngologists and dental providers is generally required to diagnose ODS. To diagnose ODS, otolaryngologists should confirm sinusitis mainly based on nasal endoscopic findings of middle meatal purulence, edema, or polyps, and dental providers should confirm dental pathology based on clinical examination and dental imaging.
CONCLUSION: Based on multidisciplinary international consensus, diagnosing ODS generally requires otolaryngologists to confirm sinusitis, and dental providers to confirm maxillary odontogenic pathology. Importantly, both dental providers and otolaryngologists should suspect ODS based on certain clinical features, and refer patients to appropriate providers for disease confirmation.
© 2021 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apical periodontitis; chronic rhinosinusitis; consensus; maxillary sinusitis; odontogenic sinusitis; oroantral fistula

Year:  2021        PMID: 33583151     DOI: 10.1002/alr.22777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  4 in total

Review 1.  Odontogenic sinusitis: A state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  John R Craig
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 2.  The Microbiology of Acute Exacerbations in Chronic Rhinosinusitis - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Oghenefejiro Okifo; Amrita Ray; David A Gudis
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.293

3.  Prelacrimal Window Approach in the Management of Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis from Dental Foreign Body.

Authors:  Saikrishna Ananthapadmanabhan; Anthony Noor; Niranjan Sritharan
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2022-09-12

4.  Key Components for the Delivery of Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Care Homes in Hong Kong: A Modified Delphi Study.

Authors:  Helen Yue-Lai Chan; Cecilia Nim-Chee Chan; Chui-Wah Man; Alice Dik-Wah Chiu; Faith Chun-Fong Liu; Edward Man-Fuk Leung
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.