Xiaofu He1, Mihaela Stefan2, David Pagliaccio2, Lana Khamash2, Martine Fontaine2, Rachel Marsh2. 1. The Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry, the New York State Psychiatric Institute and the College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: xh2170@cumc.columbia.edu. 2. The Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in the Department of Psychiatry, the New York State Psychiatric Institute and the College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the most well-validated tools for DTI data analysis is TRACULA, part of the FreeSurfer software. TRACULA automatically segments 18 major white matter (WM) tracts. Occasionally, tracts may be only partially reconstructed, thus requiring intervention to avoid biasing analyses. A majority of studies have not reported any quality control procedures and those that have tend to discard partially reconstructed tracts from group analyses if they cannot be salvaged during TRACULA reinitialization. NEW METHOD: We propose a semi-automated method to improve the detection and recovery of incomplete WM tracts. We detail several steps to maximize the quality of preprocessed DTI data. The steps include: (1) a visual inspection of eddy current corrected diffusion weighted images and (2) an automated evaluation of color- encoded FA images; (3) assessment of the volume of each tract saved in the TRACULA output file; (4) re-processing of tracts with a volume smaller than a specified threshold; (5) minimal manual editing of the control points for tracts that remained partially reconstructed; and (6) final re-initiation of TRACULA. RESULTS: Our method can speed and improve quality control relative to tract-by-tract visual inspection and can recover data that otherwise would need to be excluded from analyses due to incomplete reconstruction. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: To our knowledge, there are no publications proposing alternative methods for quality control and recovering of partially reconstructed tracts in the TRACULA environment. CONCLUSIONS: Our method helps TRACULA users automatically access the quality of reconstructed WM tracts and semi-automatically recover those in-complete WM tracts.
BACKGROUND: One of the most well-validated tools for DTI data analysis is TRACULA, part of the FreeSurfer software. TRACULA automatically segments 18 major white matter (WM) tracts. Occasionally, tracts may be only partially reconstructed, thus requiring intervention to avoid biasing analyses. A majority of studies have not reported any quality control procedures and those that have tend to discard partially reconstructed tracts from group analyses if they cannot be salvaged during TRACULA reinitialization. NEW METHOD: We propose a semi-automated method to improve the detection and recovery of incomplete WM tracts. We detail several steps to maximize the quality of preprocessed DTI data. The steps include: (1) a visual inspection of eddy current corrected diffusion weighted images and (2) an automated evaluation of color- encoded FA images; (3) assessment of the volume of each tract saved in the TRACULA output file; (4) re-processing of tracts with a volume smaller than a specified threshold; (5) minimal manual editing of the control points for tracts that remained partially reconstructed; and (6) final re-initiation of TRACULA. RESULTS: Our method can speed and improve quality control relative to tract-by-tract visual inspection and can recover data that otherwise would need to be excluded from analyses due to incomplete reconstruction. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: To our knowledge, there are no publications proposing alternative methods for quality control and recovering of partially reconstructed tracts in the TRACULA environment. CONCLUSIONS: Our method helps TRACULA users automatically access the quality of reconstructed WM tracts and semi-automatically recover those in-complete WM tracts.
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Daniel Rueckert; Thomas E Nichols; Clare E Mackay; Kate E Watkins; Olga Ciccarelli; M Zaheer Cader; Paul M Matthews; Timothy E J Behrens Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Anastasia Yendiki; Patricia Panneck; Priti Srinivasan; Allison Stevens; Lilla Zöllei; Jean Augustinack; Ruopeng Wang; David Salat; Stefan Ehrlich; Tim Behrens; Saad Jbabdi; Randy Gollub; Bruce Fischl Journal: Front Neuroinform Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 4.081
Authors: Jennifer S W Campbell; Parya MomayyezSiahkal; Peter Savadjiev; Ilana R Leppert; Kaleem Siddiqi; G Bruce Pike Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 4.003