Niheer Dasandi1, Hilary Graham2, Pete Lampard2, Slava Jankin Mikhaylov3. 1. School of Government, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: n.dasandi@bham.ac.uk. 2. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK. 3. Data Science Lab, Hertie School, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Instituted under the Paris Agreement, nationally determined contributions (NDCs) outline countries' plans for mitigating and adapting to climate change. They are the primary policy instrument for protecting people's health in the face of rising global temperatures. However, evidence on engagement with health in the NDCs is scarce. In this study, we aimed to examine how public health is incorporated in the NDCs, and how different patterns of engagement might be related to broader inequalities and tensions in global climate politics. METHODS: We analysed the NDCs in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change registry submitted by 185 countries. Using content analysis and natural language processing (NLP) methods, we developed measures of health engagement. Multivariate regression analyses examined whether country-level factors (eg, population size, gross domestic product [GDP], and climate-related exposures) were associated with greater health engagement. Using NLP methods, we compared health engagement with other climate-related challenges (ie, economy, energy, and agriculture) and examined broader differences in the keyword terms used in countries with high and low health engagement in their NDCs. FINDINGS: Countries that did not mention health in their NDCs were clustered in high-income countries, whereas greater health engagement was concentrated in low-income and middle-income countries. Having a low GDP per capita and being a small island developing state were associated with higher levels of health engagement. In addition, higher levels of population exposure to temperature change and ambient air pollution were associated with more health coverage included in a country's NDC. Variation in health engagement was greater than for other climate-related issues and reflected wider differences in countries' approaches to the NDCs. INTERPRETATION: A focus on health in the NDCs follows broader patterns of global inequalities. Poorer and climate-vulnerable countries that contribute least to climate change are more likely to engage with health in their NDCs, while richer countries focus on non-health sectors in their NDCs, such as energy and the economy. FUNDING: This work was in part funded through an unrestricted grant from the Wellcome Trust and supported by The Economic and Social Research Council.
BACKGROUND: Instituted under the Paris Agreement, nationally determined contributions (NDCs) outline countries' plans for mitigating and adapting to climate change. They are the primary policy instrument for protecting people's health in the face of rising global temperatures. However, evidence on engagement with health in the NDCs is scarce. In this study, we aimed to examine how public health is incorporated in the NDCs, and how different patterns of engagement might be related to broader inequalities and tensions in global climate politics. METHODS: We analysed the NDCs in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change registry submitted by 185 countries. Using content analysis and natural language processing (NLP) methods, we developed measures of health engagement. Multivariate regression analyses examined whether country-level factors (eg, population size, gross domestic product [GDP], and climate-related exposures) were associated with greater health engagement. Using NLP methods, we compared health engagement with other climate-related challenges (ie, economy, energy, and agriculture) and examined broader differences in the keyword terms used in countries with high and low health engagement in their NDCs. FINDINGS: Countries that did not mention health in their NDCs were clustered in high-income countries, whereas greater health engagement was concentrated in low-income and middle-income countries. Having a low GDP per capita and being a small island developing state were associated with higher levels of health engagement. In addition, higher levels of population exposure to temperature change and ambient air pollution were associated with more health coverage included in a country's NDC. Variation in health engagement was greater than for other climate-related issues and reflected wider differences in countries' approaches to the NDCs. INTERPRETATION: A focus on health in the NDCs follows broader patterns of global inequalities. Poorer and climate-vulnerable countries that contribute least to climate change are more likely to engage with health in their NDCs, while richer countries focus on non-health sectors in their NDCs, such as energy and the economy. FUNDING: This work was in part funded through an unrestricted grant from the Wellcome Trust and supported by The Economic and Social Research Council.
Authors: Nick Watts; Markus Amann; Nigel Arnell; Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson; Kristine Belesova; Maxwell Boykoff; Peter Byass; Wenjia Cai; Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum; Stuart Capstick; Jonathan Chambers; Carole Dalin; Meaghan Daly; Niheer Dasandi; Michael Davies; Paul Drummond; Robert Dubrow; Kristie L Ebi; Matthew Eckelman; Paul Ekins; Luis E Escobar; Lucia Fernandez Montoya; Lucien Georgeson; Hilary Graham; Paul Haggar; Ian Hamilton; Stella Hartinger; Jeremy Hess; Ilan Kelman; Gregor Kiesewetter; Tord Kjellstrom; Dominic Kniveton; Bruno Lemke; Yang Liu; Melissa Lott; Rachel Lowe; Maquins Odhiambo Sewe; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Mark Maslin; Lucy McAllister; Alice McGushin; Slava Jankin Mikhaylov; James Milner; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Karyn Morrissey; Kris Murray; Simon Munzert; Maria Nilsson; Tara Neville; Tadj Oreszczyn; Fereidoon Owfi; Olivia Pearman; David Pencheon; Dung Phung; Steve Pye; Ruth Quinn; Mahnaz Rabbaniha; Elizabeth Robinson; Joacim Rocklöv; Jan C Semenza; Jodi Sherman; Joy Shumake-Guillemot; Meisam Tabatabaei; Jonathon Taylor; Joaquin Trinanes; Paul Wilkinson; Anthony Costello; Peng Gong; Hugh Montgomery Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-11-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: James Hansen; Pushker Kharecha; Makiko Sato; Valerie Masson-Delmotte; Frank Ackerman; David J Beerling; Paul J Hearty; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Shi-Ling Hsu; Camille Parmesan; Johan Rockstrom; Eelco J Rohling; Jeffrey Sachs; Pete Smith; Konrad Steffen; Lise Van Susteren; Karina von Schuckmann; James C Zachos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Annabelle Workman; Grant Blashki; Kathryn J Bowen; David J Karoly; John Wiseman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 3.390