Jennifer M Reckrey1, Priscilla Gazarian2, David B Reuben3, Nancy K Latham4, Siobhan K McMahon5, Albert L Siu1,6, Fred C Ko1,6. 1. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 2. University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. University of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. 6. James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Evaluations of complex models of care for older adults may benefit from simultaneous assessment of intervention implementation. The STRIDE (Strategies To Reduce Injuries and Develop confidence in Elders) pragmatic trial evaluated the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce serious fall injuries in older adults. We conducted multi-level stakeholder interviews to identify barriers to STRIDE intervention implementation and understand efforts taken to mitigate these barriers. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with key informants. SETTING: Ten clinical trial sites affiliated with practices that provided primary care for persons at increased risk for fall injuries. PARTICIPANTS: Specially trained registered nurses working as Falls Care Managers (FCMs) who delivered the intervention (n = 13 individual interviews), Research Staff who supervised trial implementation locally (n = 10 group interviews, 23 included individuals), and members of Central Project Management and the National Patient Stakeholder Council who oversaw national implementation (n = 2 group interviews, six included individuals). MEASUREMENTS: A semi-structured interview guide derived from the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). RESULTS: We identified eight key barriers to STRIDE intervention implementation. FCMs navigated complex relationships with patients and families while working with Research Staff to implement the intervention in primary care practices with limited clinical space, variable provider buy-in, and significant primary care practice staff and provider turnover. The costs of the intervention to individual patients and medical practices amplified these barriers. Efforts to mitigate these barriers varied depending on the needs and opportunities of each primary care setting. CONCLUSION: The many barriers to implementation and the variability in how stakeholders addressed these locally may have affected the overall STRIDE intervention's effectiveness. Future pragmatic trials should incorporate simultaneous implementation aims to better understand how research interventions translate into clinical care that improves the lives of older adults.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Evaluations of complex models of care for older adults may benefit from simultaneous assessment of intervention implementation. The STRIDE (Strategies To Reduce Injuries and Develop confidence in Elders) pragmatic trial evaluated the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to reduce serious fall injuries in older adults. We conducted multi-level stakeholder interviews to identify barriers to STRIDE intervention implementation and understand efforts taken to mitigate these barriers. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews with key informants. SETTING: Ten clinical trial sites affiliated with practices that provided primary care for persons at increased risk for fall injuries. PARTICIPANTS: Specially trained registered nurses working as Falls Care Managers (FCMs) who delivered the intervention (n = 13 individual interviews), Research Staff who supervised trial implementation locally (n = 10 group interviews, 23 included individuals), and members of Central Project Management and the National Patient Stakeholder Council who oversaw national implementation (n = 2 group interviews, six included individuals). MEASUREMENTS: A semi-structured interview guide derived from the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). RESULTS: We identified eight key barriers to STRIDE intervention implementation. FCMs navigated complex relationships with patients and families while working with Research Staff to implement the intervention in primary care practices with limited clinical space, variable provider buy-in, and significant primary care practice staff and provider turnover. The costs of the intervention to individual patients and medical practices amplified these barriers. Efforts to mitigate these barriers varied depending on the needs and opportunities of each primary care setting. CONCLUSION: The many barriers to implementation and the variability in how stakeholders addressed these locally may have affected the overall STRIDE intervention's effectiveness. Future pragmatic trials should incorporate simultaneous implementation aims to better understand how research interventions translate into clinical care that improves the lives of older adults.
Authors: Shalender Bhasin; Thomas M Gill; David B Reuben; Nancy K Latham; David A Ganz; Erich J Greene; James Dziura; Shehzad Basaria; Jerry H Gurwitz; Patricia C Dykes; Siobhan McMahon; Thomas W Storer; Priscilla Gazarian; Michael E Miller; Thomas G Travison; Denise Esserman; Martha B Carnie; Lori Goehring; Maureen Fagan; Susan L Greenspan; Neil Alexander; Jocelyn Wiggins; Fred Ko; Albert L Siu; Elena Volpi; Albert W Wu; Jeremy Rich; Stephen C Waring; Robert B Wallace; Carri Casteel; Neil M Resnick; Jay Magaziner; Peter Charpentier; Charles Lu; Katy Araujo; Haseena Rajeevan; Can Meng; Heather Allore; Brooke F Brawley; Rich Eder; Joanne M McGloin; Eleni A Skokos; Pamela W Duncan; Dorothy Baker; Chad Boult; Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; Peter Peduzzi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shalender Bhasin; Thomas M Gill; David B Reuben; Nancy K Latham; Jerry H Gurwitz; Patricia Dykes; Siobhan McMahon; Thomas W Storer; Pamela W Duncan; David A Ganz; Shehzad Basaria; Michael E Miller; Thomas G Travison; Erich J Greene; James Dziura; Denise Esserman; Heather Allore; Martha B Carnie; Maureen Fagan; Catherine Hanson; Dorothy Baker; Susan L Greenspan; Neil Alexander; Fred Ko; Albert L Siu; Elena Volpi; Albert W Wu; Jeremy Rich; Stephen C Waring; Robert Wallace; Carri Casteel; Jay Magaziner; Peter Charpentier; Charles Lu; Katy Araujo; Haseena Rajeevan; Scott Margolis; Richard Eder; Joanne M McGloin; Eleni Skokos; Jocelyn Wiggins; Lawrence Garber; Steven B Clauser; Rosaly Correa-De-Araujo; Peter Peduzzi Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Laura N Gitlin; Rosa R Baier; Eric Jutkowitz; Zachary G Baker; Allison M Gustavson; Justine S Sefcik; Nancy A Hodgson; Sokha Koeuth; Joseph E Gaugler Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Chad Boult; Ariel Frank Green; Lisa B Boult; James T Pacala; Claire Snyder; Bruce Leff Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Christine Ritchie; Robin Andersen; Jessica Eng; Sarah K Garrigues; Gina Intinarelli; Helen Kao; Suzanne Kawahara; Kanan Patel; Lisa Sapiro; Anne Thibault; Erika Tunick; Deborah E Barnes Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: David B Reuben; Leslie Chang Evertson; Rebecca Jackson-Stoeckle; Gary Epstein-Lubow; Lynn Hill Spragens; Kristin Lees Haggerty; Katherine Sy Serrano; Lee A Jennings Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 7.538