BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) being a noninvasive modality may help in preoperative evaluation of intratumoral fat in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using chemical shift encoded (CSE) MRI and in-/opposed-phase (IOP) imaging sequences. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of chemical shift encoded fat fraction at three different flip angles (FAs) using quantitative chemical shift encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) with in-/opposed phase (IOP) imaging to evaluate intratumoral fat in HCC. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Eighty-six patients with 87 pathology proven HCCs. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: IOP (LAVA-Flex) and CSE-MRI (IDEAL IQ) a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequences acquired at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn by two observers in the tumors to measure mean fat fractions. Surgical specimens were reassessed for intratumoral fat content. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed for CSE-MRI sequence at FA 3°, 8°, and 9°. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was expressed in terms of inter- and intra-observer agreements. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for the diagnostic performance followed by combined metric of both. SNR/CNR were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreements (ICC >0.95, P < 0.001) were observed for both IOP and CSE-MRI. IOP (86.4%) showed higher sensitivity than CSE-MRI at FA 3° (72.5%), FA 8° (76.4%) and FA 9° (76.3%). In contrast, the specificity for CSE-MRI at FA 3° (86%), FA 8° (87%), and FA 9° (87%) were greater than IOP (72%). A combined metric of IOP and CSE-MRI derived fat fractions at FA 8° gave highest AUC of 87% and accuracy of 86%. SNR and CNR for CSE-MRI were significantly higher at FA 8° and FA 9° than FA 3° (P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: IOP and quantitative CSE-MRI are both feasible methods to detect intratumoral fat in HCC with higher accuracy and SNR for CSE-MRI at FA 8° and 9°. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) being a noninvasive modality may help in preoperative evaluation of intratumoral fat in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using chemical shift encoded (CSE) MRI and in-/opposed-phase (IOP) imaging sequences. PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of chemical shift encoded fat fraction at three different flip angles (FAs) using quantitative chemical shift encoded MRI (CSE-MRI) with in-/opposed phase (IOP) imaging to evaluate intratumoral fat in HCC. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Eighty-six patients with 87 pathology proven HCCs. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: IOP (LAVA-Flex) and CSE-MRI (IDEAL IQ) a three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo pulse sequences acquired at 3 T. ASSESSMENT: Regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn by two observers in the tumors to measure mean fat fractions. Surgical specimens were reassessed for intratumoral fat content. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed for CSE-MRI sequence at FA 3°, 8°, and 9°. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was expressed in terms of inter- and intra-observer agreements. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for the diagnostic performance followed by combined metric of both. SNR/CNR were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Excellent inter- and intra-observer agreements (ICC >0.95, P < 0.001) were observed for both IOP and CSE-MRI. IOP (86.4%) showed higher sensitivity than CSE-MRI at FA 3° (72.5%), FA 8° (76.4%) and FA 9° (76.3%). In contrast, the specificity for CSE-MRI at FA 3° (86%), FA 8° (87%), and FA 9° (87%) were greater than IOP (72%). A combined metric of IOP and CSE-MRI derived fat fractions at FA 8° gave highest AUC of 87% and accuracy of 86%. SNR and CNR for CSE-MRI were significantly higher at FA 8° and FA 9° than FA 3° (P < 0.05). DATA CONCLUSION: IOP and quantitative CSE-MRI are both feasible methods to detect intratumoral fat in HCC with higher accuracy and SNR for CSE-MRI at FA 8° and 9°. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.