| Literature DB >> 33579734 |
Maya Sabatello1, Beverly J Insel2, Bruce G Link2, Jo C Phelan2, Paul S Appelbaum2.
Abstract
The introduction of psychiatric genetic evidence in court proceedings to terminate parental rights raises concerns that such information will result in misconceived assumptions about the child's mental health trajectory and unjust rulings on termination of parental rights. We conducted an online vignette-based survey with a nationally representative sample of adults from the general public (n = 300 respondents) to assess their views on how evidence about a child's psychiatric genetic makeup may affect key decisions in termination proceedings. Our findings indicate that genetic evidence increased the child's labeling as having a psychiatric disorder, regardless of the presence of symptoms, treatment recommendations, evaluation of prescription medication, and beliefs in treatment efficacy. Genetic evidence alone did not affect whether participants would terminate parental rights, but participants who thought that the child did not have a psychiatric disorder were more likely to terminate in the presence of genetic test results. We conclude that psychiatric genetic evidence in termination proceedings may have unintended consequences, and that measures should be taken to ensure that it does not unfairly affect outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: courts; labeling; parental fitness; psychiatric genetics; termination of parental rights.
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33579734 PMCID: PMC8217070 DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200066-20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Am Acad Psychiatry Law ISSN: 1093-6793