Literature DB >> 33579309

Implementation of evidence-based practice and associated factors among nurses and midwives working in Amhara Region government hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

Asrat Hailu Dagne1, Mekonnen Haile Beshah2, Bekalu Getnet Kassa2, Eyaya Habtie Dagnaw2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementation of evidence-based practice is crucial to enhance quality health care, professional development, and cost-effective health service. However, many factors influence the implementation of evidence-based practice. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the implementation of evidence-based practice and associated factors among nurses and midwives.
METHODS: Institutional-based cross-sectional study design was conducted to assess the implementation of evidence-based practice and associated factors from February 15 to March 15, 2019, among 790 nurses and midwives. Data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 then exported to SPSS version 20 for statistical analysis. Categorical variables were presented as frequency tables. Continuous variables were presented as descriptive measures, expressed as mean and standard deviation. Cronbach's alpha was used to measure reliability, mean, standard deviation, and inter-items correlation of the factors. Independent variables with a probability value (P-value) of less than 0.2 in the Chi-square analysis were entered in the multivariable logistic regression model. Statistically significant associated factors were identified at probability value (P-value) less than 0.05 and adjusted odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 28.35 (SD ± 4.5) years. This study revealed that 34.7% (95% CI 31.5-38%) of participants implemented evidence-based practice moderately or desirably. Age of participants (AOR = 5.98, CI 1.34-26.7), barriers of implementation of evidence-based practice (AOR = 4.8, CI 2.2-10.6), the attitude of participants (AOR = 5.02, CI 1.2-21.5), nursing/midwifery work index (AOR = 3.9, CI 1.4-10.87), self-efficacy of implementation of evidence-based practice skills (AOR = 12.5, CI 5.7-27.5) and knowledge of participants (AOR = 3.06, CI 1.6-5.77) were statistically significant associated factors of implementation of evidence-based practice CONCUSSION: Implementation of evidence-based practice of nurses and midwives was poor. Age of participants, barriers of implementation of evidence-based practice, the attitude of participants, self-efficacy of implementation of evidence-based practice skills, nursing/midwifery work index, and knowledge of participants were found to be predictors of implementation of evidence-based practice. Insufficient time and difficulty in judging the quality of research papers and reports were the most common barriers to the implementation of evidence-based practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based practice; Implementation; Nurses/midwives work index

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33579309      PMCID: PMC7881559          DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01096-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Health        ISSN: 1742-4755            Impact factor:   3.223


  28 in total

1.  Barriers to research utilisation by staff nurses in a university hospital.

Authors:  Gulseren Kocaman; Seyda Seren; Ayhan A Lash; Seyyare Kurt; Nergiz Bengu; Havva A Yurumezoglu
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 3.036

Review 2.  Review for librarians of evidence-based practice in nursing and the allied health professions in the United States.

Authors:  Michael Kronenfeld; Priscilla L Stephenson; Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu; Elizabeth M Tweed; Eric L Sauers; Tamara C Valovich McLeod; Ruiling Guo; Henry Trahan; Kristine M Alpi; Beth Hill; Pamela Sherwill-Navarro; Margaret Peg Allen; Priscilla L Stephenson; Linda M Hartman; Judy Burnham; Dennis Fell; Michael Kronenfeld; Raymond Pavlick; Ellen W MacNaughton; Barbara Nail-Chiwetalu; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-10

3.  Application of revised nursing work index to hospital nurses of South Korea.

Authors:  Chul-Woung Kim; Sang-Yi Lee; Jeong-Hee Kang; Bo-Hyun Park; Sang-Chul Park; Hyeung-Keun Park; Keon-Hyung Lee; Yun-Jeong Yi; Baek-Geun Jeong
Journal:  Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci)       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 2.085

4.  Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization: a survey of registered nurses in China.

Authors:  Li-Ping Wang; Xiao-Lian Jiang; Lei Wang; Guo-Rong Wang; Yang-Jing Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evidence-based practice: Knowledge, attitudes, implementation, facilitators, and barriers among community nurses-systematic review.

Authors:  Shu Li; Meijuan Cao; Xuejiao Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Factors associated with evidence-based practice among registered nurses in Sweden: a national cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Boström; Ann Rudman; Anna Ehrenberg; Jens Petter Gustavsson; Lars Wallin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Public health interventions in midwifery: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Jenny McNeill; Fiona Lynn; Fiona Alderdice
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Evidence based practice beliefs and implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kjersti Stokke; Nina R Olsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Monica W Nortvedt
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2014-03-25

9.  The relationship among evidence-based practice and client dyspnea, pain, falls, and pressure ulcer outcomes in the community setting.

Authors:  Diane Doran; Nancy Lefebre; Linda O'Brien-Pallas; Carole A Estabrook; Peggy White; Jennifer Carryer; Winnie Sun; Gan Qian; Yu Qing Chris Bai; Mingyang Li
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Attitude, Knowledge, and Practice on Evidence-Based Nursing among Registered Nurses in Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospitals: A Multiple Center Cross-Sectional Survey in China.

Authors:  Fen Zhou; Yufang Hao; Hong Guo; Hongxia Liu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.