Literature DB >> 33579191

The regional diversity of gut microbiome along the GI tract of male C57BL/6 mice.

Enkhchimeg Lkhagva1, Hea-Jong Chung1,2, Jinny Hong3,4, Wai Hong Wilson Tang4, Sang-Il Lee5, Seong-Tshool Hong1, Seungkoo Lee6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The proliferation and survival of microbial organisms including intestinal microbes are determined by their surrounding environments. Contrary to popular myth, the nutritional and chemical compositions, water contents, O2 contents, temperatures, and pH in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract of a human are very different in a location-specific manner, implying heterogeneity of the microbial composition in a location-specific manner.
RESULTS: We first investigated the environmental conditions at 6 different locations along the GI tract and feces of ten weeks' old male SPF C57BL/6 mice. As previously known, the pH and water contents of the GI contents at the different locations of the GI tract were very different from each other in a location-specific manner, and none of which were not even similar to those of feces. After confirming the heterogeneous nature of the GI contents in specific locations and feces, we thoroughly analyzed the composition of the microbiome of the GI contents and feces. 16S rDNA-based metagenome sequencing on the GI contents and feces showed the presence of 13 different phyla. The abundance of Firmicutes gradually decreased from the stomach to feces while the abundance of Bacteroidetes gradually increased. The taxonomic α-diversities measured by ACE (Abundance-based Coverage Estimator) richness, Shannon diversity, and Fisher's alpha all indicated that the diversities of gut microbiome at colon and cecum were much higher than that of feces. The diversities of microbiome compositions were lowest in jejunum and ileum while highest in cecum and colon. Interestingly, the diversities of the fecal microbiome were lower than those of the cecum and colon. Beta diversity analyses by NMDS plots, PCA, and unsupervised hierarchical clustering all showed that the microbiome compositions were very diverse in a location-specific manner. Direct comparison of the fecal microbiome with the microbiome of the whole GI tracts by α-and β-diversities showed that the fecal microbiome did not represent the microbiome of the whole GI tract.
CONCLUSION: The fecal microbiome is different from the whole microbiome of the GI tract, contrary to a baseline assumption of contemporary microbiome research work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gut microbiome; α- diversity; β-Diversity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33579191      PMCID: PMC7881553          DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02099-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Microbiol        ISSN: 1471-2180            Impact factor:   3.605


  44 in total

Review 1.  The microbiome and innate immunity.

Authors:  Christoph A Thaiss; Niv Zmora; Maayan Levy; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The role of gut microbiota in the gut-brain axis: current challenges and perspectives.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Roshan D'Souza; Seong-Tshool Hong
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 14.870

3.  Acid-base parameters of duodenal contents in man.

Authors:  S J Rune
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  The production and transport of ammonia in the human colon.

Authors:  R L Bown; G E Sladen; M L Clark; A M Dawson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Establishment of an ideal gut microbiota to boost healthy growth of neonates.

Authors:  Thi Thanh Binh Nguyen; Hea-Jong Chung; Hyeon-Jin Kim; Seong-Tshool Hong
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 7.624

Review 6.  How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine.

Authors:  Lora V Hooper; Tore Midtvedt; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 7.  Role of the normal gut microbiota.

Authors:  Sai Manasa Jandhyala; Rupjyoti Talukdar; Chivkula Subramanyam; Harish Vuyyuru; Mitnala Sasikala; D Nageshwar Reddy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Spatial variation of the colonic microbiota in patients with ulcerative colitis and control volunteers.

Authors:  A Lavelle; G Lennon; O O'Sullivan; N Docherty; A Balfe; A Maguire; H E Mulcahy; G Doherty; D O'Donoghue; J Hyland; R P Ross; J C Coffey; K Sheahan; P D Cotter; F Shanahan; D C Winter; P R O'Connell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys.

Authors:  Joseph N Paulson; O Colin Stine; Héctor Corrada Bravo; Mihai Pop
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  8 in total

1.  Impact of probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 on amino acid metabolism in the healthy newborn mouse.

Authors:  Yuying Liu; Xiangjun Tian; Rhea C Daniel; Beanna Okeugo; Shabba A Armbrister; Meng Luo; Christopher M Taylor; Guoyao Wu; J Marc Rhoads
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.520

2.  Correlation Between Salivary Microbiome of Parotid Glands and Clinical Features in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome and Non-Sjögren's Sicca Subjects.

Authors:  Donghyun Kim; Ye Jin Jeong; Yerin Lee; Jihoon Choi; Young Min Park; Oh Chan Kwon; Yong Woo Ji; Sung Jun Ahn; Hyung Keun Lee; Min-Chan Park; Jae-Yol Lim
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  Comparative Analysis of Original and Replaced Gut Microbiomes within Same Individuals Identified the Intestinal Microbes Associated with Weight Gaining.

Authors:  Chongkai Zhai; Ji-Seon Ahn; Md Minarul Islam; Enkhchimeg Lkhagva; Hea-Jong Chung; Seong-Tshool Hong
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 4.  Gut Microbiota and Environment in Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioni; Tommaso de Cunzo; Federico Valletta; Marcello Covino; Emanuele Rinninella; Pauline Raoul; Christian Zanza; Maria Cristina Mele; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Sex Difference of Effect of Sophora flavescens on Gut Microbiota in Rats.

Authors:  Xueqing Duan; Xin Xie; Chen Zhu; Zhixuan Duan; Rui Chen; Jun Xu; Qi Zhang; Qi Yu; Weiyi Tian
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Modulation by Maternal High-Fat Diet and Thermogenic Challenge.

Authors:  Henry A Paz; Anna-Claire Pilkington; Ying Zhong; Sree V Chintapalli; James Sikes; Renny S Lan; Kartik Shankar; Umesh D Wankhade
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Effects of Virgin Olive Oil on Blood Pressure and Renal Aminopeptidase Activities in Male Wistar Rats.

Authors:  Germán Domínguez-Vías; Ana Belén Segarra; Manuel Ramírez-Sánchez; Isabel Prieto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The Influence of Probiotic Supplementation on Depressive Symptoms, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress Parameters and Fecal Microbiota in Patients with Depression Depending on Metabolic Syndrome Comorbidity-PRO-DEMET Randomized Study Protocol.

Authors:  Oliwia Gawlik-Kotelnicka; Anna Skowrońska; Aleksandra Margulska; Karolina H Czarnecka-Chrebelska; Igor Łoniewski; Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka; Dominik Strzelecki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.