Literature DB >> 33578971

Unaltered Liver Regeneration in Post-Cholestatic Rats Treated with the FXR Agonist Obeticholic Acid.

Lianne R de Haan1,2, Joanne Verheij3, Rowan F van Golen4, Verena Horneffer-van der Sluis5, Matthew R Lewis5, Ulrich H W Beuers6, Thomas M van Gulik2, Steven W M Olde Damink7,8, Frank G Schaap7,8, Michal Heger1,2,9, Pim B Olthof2,10.   

Abstract

: In a previous study, obeticholic acid (OCA) increased liver growth before partial hepatectomy (PHx) in rats through the bile acid receptor farnesoid X-receptor (FXR). In that model, OCA was administered during obstructive cholestasis. However, patients normally undergo PHx several days after biliary drainage. The effects of OCA on liver regeneration were therefore studied in post-cholestatic Wistar rats. Rats underwent sham surgery or reversible bile duct ligation (rBDL), which was relieved after 7 days. PHx was performed one day after restoration of bile flow. Rats received 10 mg/kg OCA per day or were fed vehicle from restoration of bile flow until sacrifice 5 days after PHx. Liver regeneration was comparable between cholestatic and non-cholestatic livers in PHx-subjected rats, which paralleled liver regeneration a human validation cohort. OCA treatment induced ileal Fgf15 mRNA expression but did not enhance post-PHx hepatocyte proliferation through FXR/SHP signaling. OCA treatment neither increased mitosis rates nor recovery of liver weight after PHx but accelerated liver regrowth in rats that had not been subjected to rBDL. OCA did not increase biliary injury. Conclusively, OCA does not induce liver regeneration in post-cholestatic rats and does not exacerbate biliary damage that results from cholestasis. This study challenges the previously reported beneficial effects of OCA in liver regeneration in cholestatic rats.

Entities:  

Keywords:  basolateral and canalicular transporters; bile acid metabolism; bile duct obstruction; bile salts; biliary obstruction; liver regeneration; partial hepatectomy; pharmacological intervention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33578971      PMCID: PMC7916678          DOI: 10.3390/biom11020260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomolecules        ISSN: 2218-273X


  77 in total

1.  Effect of obeticholic acid on liver regeneration following portal vein embolization in an experimental model.

Authors:  P B Olthof; F Huisman; F G Schaap; K P van Lienden; R J Bennink; R F van Golen; M Heger; J Verheij; P L Jansen; S W Olde Damink; T M van Gulik
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Bile acids, FGF15/19 and liver regeneration: From mechanisms to clinical applications.

Authors:  Gloria Alvarez-Sola; Iker Uriarte; Maria U Latasa; Maddalen Jimenez; Marina Barcena-Varela; Eva Santamaría; Raquel Urtasun; Carlos Rodriguez-Ortigosa; Jesús Prieto; Pedro Berraondo; Maite G Fernandez-Barrena; Carmen Berasain; Matías A Avila
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.187

Review 3.  Percutaneous vs. endoscopic pre-operative biliary drainage in hilar cholangiocarcinoma - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmer Hameed; Tony Pang; Judy Chiou; Henry Pleass; Vincent Lam; Michael Hollands; Emma Johnston; Arthur Richardson; Lawrence Yuen
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Farnesoid X receptor alleviates age-related proliferation defects in regenerating mouse livers by activating forkhead box m1b transcription.

Authors:  Wei-Dong Chen; Yan-Dong Wang; Lisheng Zhang; Steven Shiah; Meihua Wang; Fan Yang; Donna Yu; Barry M Forman; Wendong Huang
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Hepatostat: Liver regeneration and normal liver tissue maintenance.

Authors:  George K Michalopoulos
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  The nuclear receptor for bile acids, FXR, transactivates human organic solute transporter-alpha and -beta genes.

Authors:  Jean-François Landrier; Jyrki J Eloranta; Stephan R Vavricka; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 7.  Bile acid transporters.

Authors:  Paul A Dawson; Tian Lan; Anuradha Rao
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 8.  Physiological and biochemical basis of clinical liver function tests: a review.

Authors:  Lisette T Hoekstra; Wilmar de Graaf; Geert A A Nibourg; Michal Heger; Roelof J Bennink; Bruno Stieger; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Simple steatosis sensitizes cholestatic rats to liver injury and dysregulates bile salt synthesis and transport.

Authors:  Daniël A Lionarons; Michal Heger; Rowan F van Golen; Lindy K Alles; Vincent A van der Mark; Jaap J Kloek; Dirk R de Waart; Hendrik A Marsman; Henny Rusch; Joanne Verheij; Ulrich Beuers; Coen C Paulusma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Molecular regulation of sinusoidal liver bile acid transporters during cholestasis.

Authors:  C Gartung; S Matern
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Role of Farnesoid X Receptor in Accelerated Liver Regeneration in Rats Subjected to ALPPS.

Authors:  Noemi Daradics; Pim B Olthof; Andras Budai; Michal Heger; Thomas M van Gulik; Andras Fulop; Attila Szijarto
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 3.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.