Literature DB >> 33578798

Mouse Preclinical Cancer Immunotherapy Modeling Involving Anti-PD-1 Therapies Reveals the Need to Use Mouse Reagents to Mirror Clinical Paradigms.

Arta M Monjazeb1, Ziming Wang2, Logan V Vick1, Cordelia Dunai2, Christine Minnar3, Lam T Khuat2, William J Murphy2,4.   

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has emerged as one of the most powerful tools to reverse cancer induced immune suppression. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1) are FDA-approved and their clinical use is rapidly expanding. As opposed to the clinical paradigm, which can result in significant responses and toxicities, it has been difficult to reproduce these effects preclinically using mouse models. In large part, this is due to models, which employ rapidly growing ex vivo cultured transplantable tumor cell lines engrafted into young naïve inbred laboratory mice. However, another issue concerns the use and repeated application of xenogeneic reagents in mice (i.e., rat or hamster mAbs directed against mouse antigens at variance with clinical use of human or humanized mAbs). Building on our previous studies demonstrating that repeated administration of commonly used xenogeneic anti-PD-1 mAbs derived from both rat and hamster can induce fatal hypersensitivity in some tumor-bearing mice, we sought to compare these result with the effects of a mouse anti-mouse PD-1 mAb. Application of a murine anti-mouse PD-1 (clone: MuDX400) did not result in lethal anaphylaxis in the 4T1 tumor model. It also displayed superior antitumor effects in this and other tumor models, as it did not induce neutralizing antibody responses against the anti-PD-1 mAb, such as were observed when using xenogeneic anti-PD1 mAbs. These results demonstrate that more accurate preclinical modeling necessitates the use of mouse reagents mirroring the clinical scenario to ascertain long-term effects or toxicities, while avoiding xenogeneic responses, which do not occur clinically. Furthermore, these studies suggest a direct mechanism, whereby preclinical murine studies have often failed to recapitulate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of single agent checkpoint inhibition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PD-1; checkpoint; immunotherapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33578798      PMCID: PMC7916633          DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancers (Basel)        ISSN: 2072-6694            Impact factor:   6.639


  27 in total

1.  Utilization of mouse models in the discovery of human disease genes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.851

2.  The effect of aspirin, cortisone and other compounds on susceptibility to anaphylactic shock in mice.

Authors:  J CAMERON
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1957-10

Review 3.  Inhibitors of the PD-1 Pathway in Tumor Therapy.

Authors:  Martin W LaFleur; Yuki Muroyama; Charles G Drake; Arlene H Sharpe
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  The PD-1-PD-L pathway in immunological tolerance.

Authors:  Taku Okazaki; Tasuku Honjo
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 5.  Coinhibitory Pathways in Immunotherapy for Cancer.

Authors:  Susanne H Baumeister; Gordon J Freeman; Glenn Dranoff; Arlene H Sharpe
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 28.527

6.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Nontransgenic models of breast cancer.

Authors:  G H Heppner; F R Miller; P M Shekhar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  A novel orthotopic model of breast cancer metastasis to bone.

Authors:  M Lelekakis; J M Moseley; T J Martin; D Hards; E Williams; P Ho; D Lowen; J Javni; F R Miller; J Slavin; R L Anderson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Blockade of programmed death-1 ligands on dendritic cells enhances T cell activation and cytokine production.

Authors:  Julia A Brown; David M Dorfman; Feng-Rong Ma; Elizabeth L Sullivan; Oliver Munoz; Clive R Wood; Edward A Greenfield; Gordon J Freeman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 10.  A Paradigm Shift in Cancer Immunotherapy: From Enhancement to Normalization.

Authors:  Miguel F Sanmamed; Lieping Chen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  2 in total

1.  Blocking the inhibitory receptor programmed cell death 1 prevents allergic immune response and anaphylaxis in mice.

Authors:  Jyoti K Lama; Koji Iijima; Takao Kobayashi; Hirohito Kita
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 14.290

2.  Oncolytic measles vaccines encoding PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint blocking antibodies to increase tumor-specific T cell memory.

Authors:  Rūta Veinalde; Gemma Pidelaserra-Martí; Coline Moulin; Lara M Jeworowski; Linda Küther; Christian J Buchholz; Dirk Jäger; Guy Ungerechts; Christine E Engeland
Journal:  Mol Ther Oncolytics       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 7.200

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.