Literature DB >> 33578602

Is routine abdominal drainage necessary for patients undergoing elective hepatectomy? A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nuerzatijiang Anweier1, Shadike Apaer, Qi Zeng, Jing Wu, Shensen Gu, Tao Li, Jinming Zhao, Tuerhongjiang Tuxun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate comparative outcomes of routine abdominal drainage (RAD) and non-routine abdominal drainage (NRAD) during elective hepatic resection for hepatic neoplasms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science. The searching phrases included "liver resection," "hepatic resection," "hepatectomy," "abdominal drainage," "surgical drainage," "prophylactic drainage," "intraperitoneal drainage," "drainage tube," "hepatectomy," "abdominal drainage" and "drainage tube." Two independent reviewers critically screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Post-operative morbidity and mortality were the outcome parameters. Combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effect model.
RESULTS: We have identified 9 RCTs and 3 comparative studies reporting total of 5726 patients undergoing elective hepatectomy under RAD (n = 3084) or NRAD (NRAD group, n = 2642). RAD was associated with significantly higher overall complication rate [odds risk  = 1.79, 95% CI (1.10, 2.93), P = .02] and biliary leakage rate [odds risk  = 2.41, 95% CI (1.48, 3.91), P = .0004] compared with NRAD. Moreover, it significantly increased hospital stays [mean difference  = 0.95, 95% CI (0.02, 1.87), P = .04] compared with NRAD. RAD showed no difference regarding intra-abdominal hemorrhage, wound complications, liver failure, subphrenic complications, pulmonary complications, infectious complications, reoperation and mortality compared with NRAD.
CONCLUSIONS: Although routine abdominal drainage may help surgeons to observe post-operative complication, it seems to be associated with increased post-operative morbidity and longer hospital stays. Non-routine abdominal drainage may be an appropriate option in selected patients undergoing hepatic resection. Higher level of evidence is needed.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33578602     DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  2 in total

1.  Optimal drain management following complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a propensity-matched comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Jae Lee; In Seok Choi; Ju Ik Moon; Dae Sung Yoon; Won Jun Choi; Sang Eok Lee; Nak Song Sung; Seong Uk Kwon; In Eui Bae; Seung Jae Roh; Sung Gon Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 2.  The European Hernia Society Prehabilitation Project: A Systematic Review of Intra-Operative Prevention Strategies for Surgical Site Occurrences in Ventral Hernia Surgery.

Authors:  D Wouters; G Cavallaro; Kristian K Jensen; B East; B Jíšová; L N Jorgensen; M López-Cano; V Rodrigues-Gonçalves; C Stabilini; F Berrevoet
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.