Literature DB >> 33578527

Comparative study of verbal rating scale and numerical rating scale to assess postoperative pain intensity in the post anesthesia care unit: A prospective observational cohort study.

Ho-Jin Lee1, Yongjung Cho2, Hyundeok Joo2, Jae Yeong Jeon2, Young-Eun Jang1, Jin-Tae Kim1,3.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Postsurgical patients usually have difficulty in answering the self-report pain scales due to the residual effects of anesthetic or sedative agents in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). A comparative analysis of pain assessment tools used in the PACU is lacking.In this prospective observational study, we compared the intensity of pain using the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and the 4-category verbal rating scale (VRS) thrice, 5 minutes after PACU admission, 20 minutes after the first assessment, and just before discharge from the PACU in 200 patients undergone surgery. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to investigate the correlation between 2 scales, and the weighted kappa (κ) coefficient was performed to evaluate inter-scale reliability. Response rates of the 2 scales were also compared.VRS and NRS were highly correlated during all 3 comparisons (r = 0.767, 0.714, and 0.653, respectively; P < .0001). Each category of VRS showed a statistically significant difference in pain intensity measured by NRS during all 3 assessments. Inter-scale reliability had a fair strength of agreement for all 3 measurements (weighted κ = 0.519, 95% CI: 0.421-0.618; weighted κ = 0.511, 95% C.I: 0.409-0.613; weighted κ = 0.452, 95% C.I: 0.352-0.551, respectively). VRS showed a higher response rate for PACU patients compared to NRS in all 3 measurements (96% vs 77.5%, 99% vs 81.5%, and 96.5% vs 86.5%, respectively; P < .0001).In the PACU, VRS is a reasonable and practical pain intensity measurement tool for postsurgical patients, considering the high correlation between VRS and NRS, and a higher response rate.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33578527     DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


  4 in total

1.  Exploration of Hospital Inpatients' Use of the Verbal Rating Scale of Pain.

Authors:  Luke Bosdet; Katie Herron; Amanda C de C Williams
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-18

2.  Management of neurofibromatosis type 2 and schwannomatosis associated peripheral and intraspinal schwannomas: influence of surgery, genetics, and localization.

Authors:  Martin U Schuhmann; Julian Zipfel; Isabel Gugel; Florian Grimm; Marcos Tatagiba
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.506

3.  Efficacy and safety of different antidepressants and anticonvulsants in central poststroke pain: A network meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Ke-Yu Chen; Ruo-Yang Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Chronic Pain Treatment and Digital Health Era-An Opinion.

Authors:  V Rejula; J Anitha; R V Belfin; J Dinesh Peter
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.