Literature DB >> 33578377

The survival of reimplanted shunts following externalization: a single-institution cohort study.

Patrick D Kelly1,2, Aaron M Yengo-Kahn1,2, Robert P Naftel1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The failure-free survival of ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) following externalization for distal catheter infection or malfunction has not been adequately explored. Conversion to a ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) may allow earlier reinternalization in lieu of waiting for the peritoneum to be suitable for reimplantation. This option is tempered by historical concerns regarding high rates of VAS failure, and the risks of rare complications are rampant.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all patients undergoing externalization of a VPS at a single institution between 2005 and 2020 were grouped according to the new distal catheter terminus location at the time of reinternalization (VPS vs VAS). The primary outcomes were failure-free shunt survival and duration of shunt externalization. Secondary outcomes included early (< 6 months) shunt failure.
RESULTS: Among 36 patients, 43 shunt externalization procedures were performed. Shunts were reinternalized as VPSs in 25 cases and VASs in 18 cases. The median failure-free survival was 1002 (interquartile range [IQR] 161-3449) days for VPSs and 1163 (IQR 360-2927) days for VASs. There was no significant difference in shunt survival according to the new distal catheter terminus (log-rank, p = 0.73). Conversion to a VAS was not associated with shorter duration of shunt externalization (Wilcoxon rank-sum, p = 0.64); the median duration was 7 (IQR 5-11) days for VPSs and 8 (IQR 6-15) days for VASs. No rare complications occurred in the VAS group.
CONCLUSIONS: Shunt failure-free survival rates following externalization are similar to published survival rates for nonexternalized shunts. There was no significant difference in survival between reinternalized VPSs and VASs. Although the VAS was not associated with a shortened duration of externalization, this finding is confounded by strong institutional preference for the VPS over the VAS. Early conversion to the VAS may be a viable treatment option in light of reassuring modern VAS survival data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSF diversion; externalize; hydrocephalus; shunt externalization; ventriculoatrial shunt; ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33578377      PMCID: PMC8357850          DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.PEDS20533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  19 in total

1.  Analysis of the potential risk of central intravenous lines and/or total parenteral nutrition with ventriculoatrial shunts.

Authors:  Ian K White; Kashif A Shaikh; Obed M Nyarenchi; Madan G Kundu; Joel C Boaz; Daniel H Fulkerson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  The clinical spectrum of shunt nephritis.

Authors:  D Haffner; F Schindera; A Aschoff; S Matthias; R Waldherr; K Schärer
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 3.  Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts: part II: overdrainage, loculation, and abdominal complications.

Authors:  Samuel R Browd; Oren N Gottfried; Brian T Ragel; John R W Kestle
Journal:  Pediatr Neurol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Management of sterile abdominal pseudocysts related to ventriculoperitoneal shunts.

Authors:  Andrew Erwood; Rima S Rindler; Mustafa Motiwala; Sonia Ajmera; Brandy Vaughn; Paul Klimo; Joshua J Chern
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Salvaging the "lost peritoneum" after ventriculoatrial shunt failures.

Authors:  R Rick Bhasin; Mike K Chen; David W Pincus
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  A Multicenter Study of Factors Influencing Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Survival in Infants and Children.

Authors:  Samir S Shah; Matthew Hall; Jay G Berry; Anthony D Slonim; Gregory W Hornig; Vidya Sharma
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Cerebrospinal fluid shunt survival and etiology of failures: a seven-year institutional experience.

Authors:  Matthew J McGirt; Jean-Christophe Leveque; John C Wellons; Alan T Villavicencio; John S Hopkins; Herbert E Fuchs; Timoth M George
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.162

8.  Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jay Riva-Cambrin; John R W Kestle; Richard Holubkov; Jerry Butler; Abhaya V Kulkarni; James Drake; William E Whitehead; John C Wellons; Chevis N Shannon; Mandeep S Tamber; David D Limbrick; Curtis Rozzelle; Samuel R Browd; Tamara D Simon
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  A Comparison of Ventriculoperitoneal and Ventriculoatrial Shunts in a Population of 544 Consecutive Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  George N Rymarczuk; Robert F Keating; Daniel J Coughlin; Daniel Felbaum; John S Myseros; Chima Oluigbo; Bhupender Yadav; Karun Sharma; Suresh N Magge
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Thromboembolic complications of ventriculoatrial shunts.

Authors:  M H Drucker; V W Vanek; A A Franco; M Hanson; L Woods
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1984-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.