Literature DB >> 33577934

How hot is the hot zone? Computational modelling clarifies the role of parietal and frontoparietal connectivity during anaesthetic-induced loss of consciousness.

Riku Ihalainen1, Olivia Gosseries2, Frederik Van de Steen3, Federico Raimondo4, Rajanikant Panda2, Vincent Bonhomme5, Daniele Marinazzo3, Howard Bowman6, Steven Laureys2, Srivas Chennu7.   

Abstract

In recent years, specific cortical networks have been proposed to be crucial for sustaining consciousness, including the posterior hot zone and frontoparietal resting state networks (RSN). Here, we computationally evaluate the relative contributions of three RSNs - the default mode network (DMN), the salience network (SAL), and the central executive network (CEN) - to consciousness and its loss during propofol anaesthesia. Specifically, we use dynamic causal modelling (DCM) of 10 min of high-density EEG recordings (N = 10, 4 males) obtained during behavioural responsiveness, unconsciousness and post-anaesthetic recovery to characterise differences in effective connectivity within frontal areas, the posterior 'hot zone', frontoparietal connections, and between-RSN connections. We estimate - for the first time - a large DCM model (LAR) of resting EEG, combining the three RSNs into a rich club of interconnectivity. Consistent with the hot zone theory, our findings demonstrate reductions in inter-RSN connectivity in the parietal cortex. Within the DMN itself, the strongest reductions are in feed-forward frontoparietal and parietal connections at the precuneus node. Within the SAL and CEN, loss of consciousness generates small increases in bidirectional connectivity. Using novel DCM leave-one-out cross-validation, we show that the most consistent out-of-sample predictions of the state of consciousness come from a key set of frontoparietal connections. This finding also generalises to unseen data collected during post-anaesthetic recovery. Our findings provide new, computational evidence for the importance of the posterior hot zone in explaining the loss of consciousness, highlighting also the distinct role of frontoparietal connectivity in underpinning conscious responsiveness, and consequently, suggest a dissociation between the mechanisms most prominently associated with explaining the contrast between conscious awareness and unconsciousness, and those maintaining consciousness.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaesthesia; Consciousness; Dynamic causal modelling; EEG; Effective connectivity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33577934     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  4 in total

1.  Consciousness Rebound: The Second-Century Challenge for Anesthesiology and Neuroscience.

Authors:  Max B Kelz
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Update on neuroimaging in disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Leandro R D Sanz; Aurore Thibaut; Brian L Edlow; Steven Laureys; Olivia Gosseries
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 6.283

3.  Brain Metabolic Connectivity Patterns in Patients with Prolonged Disorder of Consciousness after Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Zhijie He; Rongrong Lu; Yihui Guan; Yi Wu; Jingjie Ge; Gang Liu; Ying Chen; Hongyu Xie; Junfa Wu; Jie Jia
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-07

4.  Cortical Responses to Vowel Sequences in Awake and Anesthetized States: A Human Intracranial Electrophysiology Study.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Ariane E Rhone; Bryan M Krause; Rashmi N Mueller; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew I Banks
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.861

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.