Erik Landfeldt1, Astrid Pechmann2, Hugh J McMillan3, Hanns Lochmüller2,3,4, Thomas Sejersen5,6. 1. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Vägen 37A, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. erik.landfeldt@gmail.com. 2. Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Centre-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 3. Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 4. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital; and Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Vägen 37A, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden. 6. Karolinska University Hospital, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to conduct a systematic literature review of estimates of costs of illness of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (through PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and the National Health Service Health Technology Assessment Database for studies published from inception up until 31 August, 2020, reporting direct medical, direct non-medical, and/or indirect costs of any phenotype of SMA. Two reviewers independently screened records for eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed studies for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Costs were adjusted and converted to 2018 US dollars. RESULTS: The search identified 14 studies from eight countries (Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, the UK, and the USA). The mean per-patient annual direct medical cost of illness was estimated at between $3320 (SMA type III, Italy) and $324,410 (SMA type I, USA), mean per-patient annual direct non-medical cost between $25,880 (SMA types I-III, Spain) and $136,800 (SMA type I, Sweden), and mean per-patient annual indirect cost between $9440 (SMA type I, Germany) and $74,910 (SMA type II, Australia). Most studies exhibited a risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The current body of evidence of costs of illness of SMA is relatively scarce and characterized by considerable variability across geographical settings and disease phenotypes. Our review provides data pertaining to the economic impact of SMA, which is of particular relevance in light of emerging treatments and ongoing research in this field, and underscores the substantial unmet medical need in this patient population.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of our study was to conduct a systematic literature review of estimates of costs of illness of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (through PubMed), CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, and the National Health Service Health Technology Assessment Database for studies published from inception up until 31 August, 2020, reporting direct medical, direct non-medical, and/or indirect costs of any phenotype of SMA. Two reviewers independently screened records for eligibility, extracted the data, and assessed studies for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Costs were adjusted and converted to 2018 US dollars. RESULTS: The search identified 14 studies from eight countries (Australia, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, the UK, and the USA). The mean per-patient annual direct medical cost of illness was estimated at between $3320 (SMA type III, Italy) and $324,410 (SMA type I, USA), mean per-patient annual direct non-medical cost between $25,880 (SMA types I-III, Spain) and $136,800 (SMA type I, Sweden), and mean per-patient annual indirect cost between $9440 (SMA type I, Germany) and $74,910 (SMA type II, Australia). Most studies exhibited a risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The current body of evidence of costs of illness of SMA is relatively scarce and characterized by considerable variability across geographical settings and disease phenotypes. Our review provides data pertaining to the economic impact of SMA, which is of particular relevance in light of emerging treatments and ongoing research in this field, and underscores the substantial unmet medical need in this patient population.
Authors: Stephen J Kolb; Christopher S Coffey; Jon W Yankey; Kristin Krosschell; W David Arnold; Seward B Rutkove; Kathryn J Swoboda; Sandra P Reyna; Ai Sakonju; Basil T Darras; Richard Shell; Nancy Kuntz; Diana Castro; Julie Parsons; Anne M Connolly; Claudia A Chiriboga; Craig McDonald; W Bryan Burnette; Klaus Werner; Mathula Thangarajh; Perry B Shieh; Erika Finanger; Merit E Cudkowicz; Michelle M McGovern; D Elizabeth McNeil; Richard Finkel; Susan T Iannaccone; Edward Kaye; Allison Kingsley; Samantha R Renusch; Vicki L McGovern; Xueqian Wang; Phillip G Zaworski; Thomas W Prior; Arthur H M Burghes; Amy Bartlett; John T Kissel Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Richard S Finkel; Michael P McDermott; Petra Kaufmann; Basil T Darras; Wendy K Chung; Douglas M Sproule; Peter B Kang; A Reghan Foley; Michelle L Yang; William B Martens; Maryam Oskoui; Allan M Glanzman; Jean Flickinger; Jacqueline Montes; Sally Dunaway; Jessica O'Hagen; Janet Quigley; Susan Riley; Maryjane Benton; Patricia A Ryan; Megan Montgomery; Jonathan Marra; Clifton Gooch; Darryl C De Vivo Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Julio López-Bastida; Luz María Peña-Longobardo; Isaac Aranda-Reneo; Eduardo Tizzano; Mark Sefton; Juan Oliva-Moreno Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 4.123