Literature DB >> 33576783

Alternative donor transplantation for myelodysplastic syndromes: haploidentical relative and matched unrelated donors.

Michael R Grunwald1, Mei-Jie Zhang2,3, Hany Elmariah4, Mariam H Johnson3, Andrew St Martin3, Asad Bashey5, Minoo Battiwalla6, Christopher N Bredeson7,8, Edward Copelan1, Corey S Cutler9, Biju R George10, Vikas Gupta11, Christopher Kanakry12, Rohtesh S Mehta13, Filippo Milano14, Alberto Mussetti15, Ryotaro Nakamura16, Taiga Nishihori4, Wael Saber3, Melhem Solh5, Daniel J Weisdorf17, Mary Eapen3.   

Abstract

We compared outcomes in 603 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after HLA-haploidentical relative (n = 176) and HLA-matched unrelated (n = 427) donor hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from 2012 to 2017, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database. All transplantations used reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. Total-body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide and fludarabine was the predominant regimen for HLA-haploidentical relative donor HCT, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was uniformly posttransplantation cyclophosphamide, calcineurin inhibitor, and mycophenolate. Fludarabine with busulfan or melphalan was the predominant regimen for HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT, and GVHD prophylaxis was calcineurin inhibitor with mycophenolate or methotrexate. Results of multivariate analysis revealed higher relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; P = .0055; 2-year relapse rate, 48% vs 33%) and lower disease-free survival (DFS) rates after HLA-haploidentical relative donor HCT (HR, 1.29; P = .042; 2-year DFS, 29% vs 36%). However, overall survival (OS) rates did not differ between donor type (HR, 0.94; P = .65; 2-year OS, 46% for HLA-haploidentical and 44% for HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT) because of mortality associated with chronic GVHD. Acute grade 2 to 4 GVHD (HR, 0.44; P < .0001) and chronic GVHD (HR, 0.36; P < .0001) were lower after HLA-haploidentical relative donor HCT. By 2 years, probability of death resulting from chronic GVHD was lower after HLA-haploidentical relative compared with HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT (6% vs 21%), negating any potential survival advantage from better relapse control. Both donor types extend access to transplantation for patients with MDS; strategies for better relapse control are desirable for HLA-haploidentical relative donor HCT, and effective GVHD prophylaxis regimens are needed for unrelated donor HCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33576783      PMCID: PMC7903230          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  26 in total

1.  Testing for centre effects in multi-centre survival studies: a Monte Carlo comparison of fixed and random effects tests.

Authors:  P K Andersen; J P Klein; M J Zhang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  SAS macros for estimation of direct adjusted cumulative incidence curves under proportional subdistribution hazards models.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Mei-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Effect of age on outcome of reduced-intensity hematopoietic cell transplantation for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission or with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Brian L McClune; Daniel J Weisdorf; Tanya L Pedersen; Gisela Tunes da Silva; Martin S Tallman; Jorge Sierra; John Dipersio; Armand Keating; Robert P Gale; Biju George; Vikas Gupta; Theresa Hahn; Luis Isola; Madan Jagasia; Hillard Lazarus; David Marks; Richard Maziarz; Edmund K Waller; Chris Bredeson; Sergio Giralt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Three prophylaxis regimens (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide; tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; or tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc) versus tacrolimus and methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease with haemopoietic cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning: a randomised phase 2 trial with a non-randomised contemporaneous control group (BMT CTN 1203).

Authors:  Javier Bolaños-Meade; Ran Reshef; Raphael Fraser; Mingwei Fei; Sunil Abhyankar; Zaid Al-Kadhimi; Amin M Alousi; Joseph H Antin; Sally Arai; Kate Bickett; Yi-Bin Chen; Lloyd E Damon; Yvonne A Efebera; Nancy L Geller; Sergio A Giralt; Parameswaran Hari; Shernan G Holtan; Mary M Horowitz; David A Jacobsohn; Richard J Jones; Jane L Liesveld; Brent R Logan; Margaret L MacMillan; Marco Mielcarek; Pierre Noel; Joseph Pidala; David L Porter; Iskra Pusic; Ronald Sobecks; Scott R Solomon; Daniel J Weisdorf; Juan Wu; Marcelo C Pasquini; John Koreth
Journal:  Lancet Haematol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 18.959

5.  HLA-matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation improves outcome of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome A prospective study on behalf of SFGM-TC and GFM.

Authors:  M Robin; R Porcher; L Adès; E Raffoux; M Michallet; S François; J-Y Cahn; A Delmer; E Wattel; S Vigouroux; J-O Bay; J Cornillon; A Huynh; S Nguyen; M-T Rubio; L Vincent; N Maillard; A Charbonnier; R P de Latour; O Reman; H Dombret; P Fenaux; G Socié
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Versus Unstimulated Bone Marrow As a Graft Source for T-Cell-Replete Haploidentical Donor Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Asad Bashey; Mei-Jie Zhang; Shannon R McCurdy; Andrew St Martin; Trevor Argall; Claudio Anasetti; Stefan O Ciurea; Omotayo Fasan; Sameh Gaballa; Mehdi Hamadani; Pashna Munshi; Monzr M Al Malki; Ryotaro Nakamura; Paul V O'Donnell; Miguel-Angel Perales; Kavita Raj; Rizwan Romee; Scott Rowley; Vanderson Rocha; Rachel B Salit; Melhem Solh; Robert J Soiffer; Ephraim Joseph Fuchs; Mary Eapen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Haploidentical transplant for myelodysplastic syndrome: registry-based comparison with identical sibling transplant.

Authors:  Y Wang; H-X Wang; Y-R Lai; Z-M Sun; D-P Wu; M Jiang; D-H Liu; K-L Xu; Q-F Liu; L Liu; J-B Wang; F Gao; J Ou-Yang; S-J Gao; L-P Xu; X-J Huang
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions.

Authors:  Andrea Bacigalupo; Karen Ballen; Doug Rizzo; Sergio Giralt; Hillard Lazarus; Vincent Ho; Jane Apperley; Shimon Slavin; Marcelo Pasquini; Brenda M Sandmaier; John Barrett; Didier Blaise; Robert Lowski; Mary Horowitz
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading.

Authors:  D Przepiorka; D Weisdorf; P Martin; H G Klingemann; P Beatty; J Hows; E D Thomas
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.483

10.  Impact of donor source on hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

Authors:  Wael Saber; Corey S Cutler; Ryotaro Nakamura; Mei-Jie Zhang; Ehab Atallah; J Douglas Rizzo; Richard T Maziarz; Jorge Cortes; Matt E Kalaycio; Mary M Horowitz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  BMT for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: When and Where and How.

Authors:  Akriti G Jain; Hany Elmariah
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Responses of regulatory and effector T-cells to low-dose interleukin-2 differ depending on the immune environment after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Yusuke Meguri; Takeru Asano; Takanori Yoshioka; Miki Iwamoto; Shuntaro Ikegawa; Hiroyuki Sugiura; Yuriko Kishi; Makoto Nakamura; Yasuhisa Sando; Takumi Kondo; Yuichi Sumii; Yoshinobu Maeda; Ken-Ichi Matsuoka
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 8.786

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.