Literature DB >> 33576613

Rapid Distinction and Semiquantitative Analysis of THC and CBD by Silver-Impregnated Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry.

Si Huang1,2, Frank W Claassen2, Teris A van Beek2, Bo Chen1, Jianguo Zeng3, Han Zuilhof1,2,4, Gert Ij Salentijn2,5.   

Abstract

The control over the amount of psychoactive THC (Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) in commercial cannabidiol (CBD) products has to be strict. A fast and simple semiquantitative Ag(I)-impregnated paper spray mass spectrometric method for differentiating between THC and CBD, which show no difference in standard single-stage or tandem MS, was established. Because of a different binding affinity to Ag(I) ions, quasi-molecular Ag(I) adducts [THC + Ag]+ and [CBD + Ag]+ at m/z 421 and 423 give different fragmentation patterns. The product ions at m/z 313 for THC and m/z 353 and 355 for CBD can be used to distinguish THC and CBD and to determine their ratio. Quantification of THC/CBD ratios in commercial CBD oils was accomplished with a low matrix effect (-2.2 ± 0.4% for THC and -2.0 ± 0.3% for CBD). After simple methanol extraction (recovery of 87.3 ± 1.2% for THC and 92.3 ± 1.4% for CBD), Ag(I)-impregnated paper spray analysis was employed to determine this ratio. A single run can be completed in a few minutes. This method was benchmarked against the UHPLC-UV method. Ag(I)-impregnated paper spray MS had the same working range (THC/CBD = 0.001-1) as UHPLC-UV analysis (R2 = 0.9896 and R2 = 0.9998, respectively), as well as comparable accuracy (-2.7 to 14%) and precision (RSD 1.7-11%). The method was further validated by the analysis of 10 commercial oils by Ag(I)-impregnated paper spray MS and UHPLC-UV analysis. Based on the determined relative concentration ratios of THC/CBD and the declared CBD concentration, 6 out of 10 CBD oils appear to contain more THC than the Dutch legal limit of 0.05%.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33576613     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  2 in total

1.  Direct In Vivo Analysis of CBD- and THC-Acid Cannabinoids and Classification of Cannabis Cultivars Using SpiderMass.

Authors:  Nina Ogrinc; Serge Schneider; Adèle Bourmaud; Nicolas Gengler; Michel Salzet; Isabelle Fournier
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Semiquantitative Screening of THC Analogues by Silica Gel TLC with an Ag(I) Retention Zone and Chromogenic Smartphone Detection.

Authors:  Si Huang; Ruiying Qiu; Zhengfa Fang; Ke Min; Teris A van Beek; Ming Ma; Bo Chen; Han Zuilhof; Gert Ij Salentijn
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 8.008

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.