Literature DB >> 33576413

Quantification of abdominal fat from computed tomography using deep learning and its association with electronic health records in an academic biobank.

Matthew T MacLean1,2, Qasim Jehangir3, Marijana Vujkovic3, Yi-An Ko1, Harold Litt1, Arijitt Borthakur1, Hersh Sagreiya1, Mark Rosen1, David A Mankoff1, Mitchell D Schnall2, Haochang Shou4, Julio Chirinos3, Scott M Damrauer5, Drew A Torigian1, Rotonya Carr3, Daniel J Rader2,3, Walter R Witschey1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a fully automated algorithm for abdominal fat segmentation and to deploy this method at scale in an academic biobank.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We built a fully automated image curation and labeling technique using deep learning and distributive computing to identify subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat compartments from 52,844 computed tomography scans in 13,502 patients in the Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB). A classification network identified the inferior and superior borders of the abdomen, and a segmentation network differentiated visceral and subcutaneous fat. Following technical evaluation of our method, we conducted studies to validate known relationships with visceral and subcutaneous fat.
RESULTS: When compared with 100 manually annotated cases, the classification network was on average within one 5-mm slice for both the superior (0.4 ± 1.1 slice) and inferior (0.4 ± 0.6 slice) borders. The segmentation network also demonstrated excellent performance with intraclass correlation coefficients of 1.00 (P < 2 × 10-16) for subcutaneous and 1.00 (P < 2 × 10-16) for visceral fat on 100 testing cases. We performed integrative analyses of abdominal fat with the phenome extracted from the electronic health record and found highly significant associations with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal failure, among other phenotypes.
CONCLUSIONS: This work presents a fully automated and highly accurate method for the quantification of abdominal fat that can be applied to routine clinical imaging studies to fuel translational scientific discovery.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body mass index; deep learning; machine learning, Penn Medicine biobank, visceral fat; subcutaneous fat

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33576413      PMCID: PMC8661423          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  34 in total

1.  Relationship of visceral and subcutaneous adiposity with renal function in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Sung Rae Kim; Ji Han Yoo; Ho Cheol Song; Seong Su Lee; Soon Jib Yoo; Young-Du Kim; Yeon Soo Lim; Hyung Wook Kim; Chul Woo Yang; Yong-Soo Kim; Euy Jin Choi; Yong Kyun Kim
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Decoupled active contour (DAC) for boundary detection.

Authors:  Akshaya Kumar Mishra; Paul W Fieguth; David A Clausi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Automated Abdominal Segmentation of CT Scans for Body Composition Analysis Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Alexander D Weston; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Timothy L Kline; Kenneth A Philbrick; Petro Kostandy; Tomas Sakinis; Motokazu Sugimoto; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley J Erickson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Body mass index versus waist circumference as predictors of mortality in Canadian adults.

Authors:  A E Staiano; B A Reeder; S Elliott; M R Joffres; P Pahwa; S A Kirkland; G Paradis; P T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks.

Authors:  Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and women.

Authors:  M C Pouliot; J P Després; S Lemieux; S Moorjani; C Bouchard; A Tremblay; A Nadeau; P J Lupien
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Body fat assessment method using CT images with separation mask algorithm.

Authors:  Young Jae Kim; Seung Hyun Lee; Tae Yun Kim; Jeong Yun Park; Seung Hong Choi; Kwang Gi Kim
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Which anthropometric measurements including visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, body mass index, and waist circumference could predict the urinary stone composition most?

Authors:  Jae Heon Kim; Seung Whan Doo; Kang Su Cho; Won Jae Yang; Yun Seob Song; Jiyoung Hwang; Seong Sook Hong; Soon-Sun Kwon
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Biobanks in the era of personalized medicine: objectives, challenges, and innovation: Overview.

Authors:  Judita Kinkorová
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Segmentation of Abdominal Muscle and Fat on Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hyo Jung Park; Yongbin Shin; Jisuk Park; Hyosang Kim; In Seob Lee; Dong Woo Seo; Jimi Huh; Tae Young Lee; TaeYong Park; Jeongjin Lee; Kyung Won Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  1 in total

1.  A multiancestry genome-wide association study of unexplained chronic ALT elevation as a proxy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with histological and radiological validation.

Authors:  Marijana Vujkovic; Shweta Ramdas; Daniel J Rader; Benjamin F Voight; Kyong-Mi Chang; Kim M Lorenz; Xiuqing Guo; Rebecca Darlay; Heather J Cordell; Jing He; Yevgeniy Gindin; Chuhan Chung; Robert P Myers; Carolin V Schneider; Joseph Park; Kyung Min Lee; Marina Serper; Rotonya M Carr; David E Kaplan; Mary E Haas; Matthew T MacLean; Walter R Witschey; Xiang Zhu; Catherine Tcheandjieu; Rachel L Kember; Henry R Kranzler; Anurag Verma; Ayush Giri; Derek M Klarin; Yan V Sun; Jie Huang; Jennifer E Huffman; Kate Townsend Creasy; Nicholas J Hand; Ching-Ti Liu; Michelle T Long; Jie Yao; Matthew Budoff; Jingyi Tan; Xiaohui Li; Henry J Lin; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Kent D Taylor; Ruey-Kang Chang; Ronald M Krauss; Silvia Vilarinho; Joseph Brancale; Jonas B Nielsen; Adam E Locke; Marcus B Jones; Niek Verweij; Aris Baras; K Rajender Reddy; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Arun J Sanyal; Naga Chalasani; Kathleen A Ryan; Braxton D Mitchell; Dipender Gill; Andrew D Wells; Elisabetta Manduchi; Yedidya Saiman; Nadim Mahmud; Donald R Miller; Peter D Reaven; Lawrence S Phillips; Sumitra Muralidhar; Scott L DuVall; Jennifer S Lee; Themistocles L Assimes; Saiju Pyarajan; Kelly Cho; Todd L Edwards; Scott M Damrauer; Peter W Wilson; J Michael Gaziano; Christopher J O'Donnell; Amit V Khera; Struan F A Grant; Christopher D Brown; Philip S Tsao; Danish Saleheen; Luca A Lotta; Lisa Bastarache; Quentin M Anstee; Ann K Daly; James B Meigs; Jerome I Rotter; Julie A Lynch
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 41.307

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.