OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a fully automated algorithm for abdominal fat segmentation and to deploy this method at scale in an academic biobank. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We built a fully automated image curation and labeling technique using deep learning and distributive computing to identify subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat compartments from 52,844 computed tomography scans in 13,502 patients in the Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB). A classification network identified the inferior and superior borders of the abdomen, and a segmentation network differentiated visceral and subcutaneous fat. Following technical evaluation of our method, we conducted studies to validate known relationships with visceral and subcutaneous fat. RESULTS: When compared with 100 manually annotated cases, the classification network was on average within one 5-mm slice for both the superior (0.4 ± 1.1 slice) and inferior (0.4 ± 0.6 slice) borders. The segmentation network also demonstrated excellent performance with intraclass correlation coefficients of 1.00 (P < 2 × 10-16) for subcutaneous and 1.00 (P < 2 × 10-16) for visceral fat on 100 testing cases. We performed integrative analyses of abdominal fat with the phenome extracted from the electronic health record and found highly significant associations with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal failure, among other phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: This work presents a fully automated and highly accurate method for the quantification of abdominal fat that can be applied to routine clinical imaging studies to fuel translational scientific discovery.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a fully automated algorithm for abdominal fat segmentation and to deploy this method at scale in an academic biobank. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We built a fully automated image curation and labeling technique using deep learning and distributive computing to identify subcutaneous and visceral abdominal fat compartments from 52,844 computed tomography scans in 13,502 patients in the Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB). A classification network identified the inferior and superior borders of the abdomen, and a segmentation network differentiated visceral and subcutaneous fat. Following technical evaluation of our method, we conducted studies to validate known relationships with visceral and subcutaneous fat. RESULTS: When compared with 100 manually annotated cases, the classification network was on average within one 5-mm slice for both the superior (0.4 ± 1.1 slice) and inferior (0.4 ± 0.6 slice) borders. The segmentation network also demonstrated excellent performance with intraclass correlation coefficients of 1.00 (P < 2 × 10-16) for subcutaneous and 1.00 (P < 2 × 10-16) for visceral fat on 100 testing cases. We performed integrative analyses of abdominal fat with the phenome extracted from the electronic health record and found highly significant associations with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and renal failure, among other phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: This work presents a fully automated and highly accurate method for the quantification of abdominal fat that can be applied to routine clinical imaging studies to fuel translational scientific discovery.
Authors: Alexander D Weston; Panagiotis Korfiatis; Timothy L Kline; Kenneth A Philbrick; Petro Kostandy; Tomas Sakinis; Motokazu Sugimoto; Naoki Takahashi; Bradley J Erickson Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: A E Staiano; B A Reeder; S Elliott; M R Joffres; P Pahwa; S A Kirkland; G Paradis; P T Katzmarzyk Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Andre Esteva; Brett Kuprel; Roberto A Novoa; Justin Ko; Susan M Swetter; Helen M Blau; Sebastian Thrun Journal: Nature Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M C Pouliot; J P Després; S Lemieux; S Moorjani; C Bouchard; A Tremblay; A Nadeau; P J Lupien Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1994-03-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Marijana Vujkovic; Shweta Ramdas; Daniel J Rader; Benjamin F Voight; Kyong-Mi Chang; Kim M Lorenz; Xiuqing Guo; Rebecca Darlay; Heather J Cordell; Jing He; Yevgeniy Gindin; Chuhan Chung; Robert P Myers; Carolin V Schneider; Joseph Park; Kyung Min Lee; Marina Serper; Rotonya M Carr; David E Kaplan; Mary E Haas; Matthew T MacLean; Walter R Witschey; Xiang Zhu; Catherine Tcheandjieu; Rachel L Kember; Henry R Kranzler; Anurag Verma; Ayush Giri; Derek M Klarin; Yan V Sun; Jie Huang; Jennifer E Huffman; Kate Townsend Creasy; Nicholas J Hand; Ching-Ti Liu; Michelle T Long; Jie Yao; Matthew Budoff; Jingyi Tan; Xiaohui Li; Henry J Lin; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Kent D Taylor; Ruey-Kang Chang; Ronald M Krauss; Silvia Vilarinho; Joseph Brancale; Jonas B Nielsen; Adam E Locke; Marcus B Jones; Niek Verweij; Aris Baras; K Rajender Reddy; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Arun J Sanyal; Naga Chalasani; Kathleen A Ryan; Braxton D Mitchell; Dipender Gill; Andrew D Wells; Elisabetta Manduchi; Yedidya Saiman; Nadim Mahmud; Donald R Miller; Peter D Reaven; Lawrence S Phillips; Sumitra Muralidhar; Scott L DuVall; Jennifer S Lee; Themistocles L Assimes; Saiju Pyarajan; Kelly Cho; Todd L Edwards; Scott M Damrauer; Peter W Wilson; J Michael Gaziano; Christopher J O'Donnell; Amit V Khera; Struan F A Grant; Christopher D Brown; Philip S Tsao; Danish Saleheen; Luca A Lotta; Lisa Bastarache; Quentin M Anstee; Ann K Daly; James B Meigs; Jerome I Rotter; Julie A Lynch Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 41.307