Vadim Y Kuperman1, Leslie M Lubich2. 1. Medical Physics Support, Inc., Tampa, FL 33634, United States of America. 2. Florida Urology Partners, Tampa, FL 33606, United States of America.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of dose heterogeneity in the treatment target on biologically effective dose (BED) for frequently used hypofractionation regimens in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: In the case of non-uniform target dose, BED in the planning target volume (PTV) is determined by using the linear-quadratic model. An expression for BED is obtained for an arbitrary dose distribution in the PTV in the case of small variance of the target dose. Another analytical expression for BED is obtained by assuming a Gaussian dose distribution in the target. RESULTS: Analytical expressions for BED as a function of the variance of the target dose have been derived. It is shown that a relatively small dose inhomogeneity (<5%-6%) can cause a significant reduction (i.e. >10%) in the corresponding BED and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) compared to the case of uniform target dose. CONCLUSIONS: Small variations in the absorbed dose can significantly reduce BED and EUD in the PTV. The effect of dose non-uniformity on BED increases with increasing dose per fraction. The observed reduction in BED compared to that for uniform target dose can be several times greater for SBRT than for standard fractionation with dose per fraction varying between 1.8 and 2 Gy.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of dose heterogeneity in the treatment target on biologically effective dose (BED) for frequently used hypofractionation regimens in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: In the case of non-uniform target dose, BED in the planning target volume (PTV) is determined by using the linear-quadratic model. An expression for BED is obtained for an arbitrary dose distribution in the PTV in the case of small variance of the target dose. Another analytical expression for BED is obtained by assuming a Gaussian dose distribution in the target. RESULTS: Analytical expressions for BED as a function of the variance of the target dose have been derived. It is shown that a relatively small dose inhomogeneity (<5%-6%) can cause a significant reduction (i.e. >10%) in the corresponding BED and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) compared to the case of uniform target dose. CONCLUSIONS: Small variations in the absorbed dose can significantly reduce BED and EUD in the PTV. The effect of dose non-uniformity on BED increases with increasing dose per fraction. The observed reduction in BED compared to that for uniform target dose can be several times greater for SBRT than for standard fractionation with dose per fraction varying between 1.8 and 2 Gy.