Grant M Fischer1, Renato A Guerrieri1, Qianghua Hu1, Aron Y Joon2, Swaminathan Kumar1, Lauren E Haydu3, Jennifer L McQuade1, Y N Vashisht Gopal1, Barbara Knighton1, Wanleng Deng1, Courtney W Hudgens4,5, Alexander J Lazar4,5,6, Michael T Tetzlaff4,5, Michael A Davies4,1,6,7. 1. Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 3. Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 4. Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 5. Department of Pathology/Lab Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 6. Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. 7. Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, we showed that melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are characterized by increased utilization of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolic pathway compared to melanoma extracranial metastases (ECMs). MBM growth was inhibited by a potent direct OXPHOS inhibitor, but observed toxicities support the need to identify alternative therapeutic strategies. Thus, we explored the features associated with OXPHOS to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of MBMs. METHODS: We applied an OXPHOS gene signature to our cohort of surgically resected MBMs that had undergone RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) (n = 88). Clustering by curated gene sets identified MBMs with significant enrichment (High-OXPHOS; n = 21) and depletion (Low-OXPHOS; n = 25) of OXPHOS genes. Clinical data, RNA-seq analysis, and immunohistochemistry were utilized to identify significant clinical, molecular, metabolic, and immune associations with OXPHOS in MBMs. Preclinical models were used to further compare melanomas with High- and Low-OXPHOS and for functional validation. RESULTS: High-OXPHOS MBMs were associated with shorter survival from craniotomy compared to Low-OXPHOS MBMs. High-OXPHOS MBMs exhibited an increase in glutamine metabolism, and treatment with the glutaminase inhibitor CB839 improved survival in mice with MAPKi-resistant, High-OXPHOS intracranial xenografts. High-OXPHOS MBMs also exhibited a transcriptional signature of deficient immune activation, which was reversed in B16-F10 intracranial tumors with metformin treatment, an OXPHOS inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: OXPHOS is associated with distinct clinical, molecular, metabolic, and immune phenotypes in MBMs. These associations suggest rational therapeutic strategies for further testing to improve outcomes in MBM patients.
BACKGROUND: Recently, we showed that melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) are characterized by increased utilization of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) metabolic pathway compared to melanoma extracranial metastases (ECMs). MBM growth was inhibited by a potent direct OXPHOS inhibitor, but observed toxicities support the need to identify alternative therapeutic strategies. Thus, we explored the features associated with OXPHOS to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of MBMs. METHODS: We applied an OXPHOS gene signature to our cohort of surgically resected MBMs that had undergone RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) (n = 88). Clustering by curated gene sets identified MBMs with significant enrichment (High-OXPHOS; n = 21) and depletion (Low-OXPHOS; n = 25) of OXPHOS genes. Clinical data, RNA-seq analysis, and immunohistochemistry were utilized to identify significant clinical, molecular, metabolic, and immune associations with OXPHOS in MBMs. Preclinical models were used to further compare melanomas with High- and Low-OXPHOS and for functional validation. RESULTS: High-OXPHOS MBMs were associated with shorter survival from craniotomy compared to Low-OXPHOS MBMs. High-OXPHOS MBMs exhibited an increase in glutamine metabolism, and treatment with the glutaminase inhibitor CB839 improved survival in mice with MAPKi-resistant, High-OXPHOS intracranial xenografts. High-OXPHOS MBMs also exhibited a transcriptional signature of deficient immune activation, which was reversed in B16-F10 intracranial tumors with metformin treatment, an OXPHOS inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: OXPHOS is associated with distinct clinical, molecular, metabolic, and immune phenotypes in MBMs. These associations suggest rational therapeutic strategies for further testing to improve outcomes in MBM patients.
Authors: Mary K Tripp; Meg Watson; Sophie J Balk; Susan M Swetter; Jeffrey E Gershenwald Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Michael A Davies; Philippe Saiag; Caroline Robert; Jean-Jacques Grob; Keith T Flaherty; Ana Arance; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Luc Thomas; Thierry Lesimple; Laurent Mortier; Stergios J Moschos; David Hogg; Iván Márquez-Rodas; Michele Del Vecchio; Céleste Lebbé; Nicolas Meyer; Ying Zhang; Yingjie Huang; Bijoyesh Mookerjee; Georgina V Long Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-06-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Praveen K Bommareddy; Salvatore Aspromonte; Andrew Zloza; Samuel D Rabkin; Howard L Kaufman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-12-12 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Grant M Fischer; Ali Jalali; David A Kircher; Won-Chul Lee; Jennifer L McQuade; Lauren E Haydu; Aron Y Joon; Alexandre Reuben; Mariana P de Macedo; Fernando C L Carapeto; Chendong Yang; Anuj Srivastava; Chandrashekar R Ambati; Arun Sreekumar; Courtney W Hudgens; Barbara Knighton; Wanleng Deng; Sherise D Ferguson; Hussein A Tawbi; Isabella C Glitza; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Y N Vashisht Gopal; Patrick Hwu; Jason T Huse; Jennifer A Wargo; P Andrew Futreal; Nagireddy Putluri; Alexander J Lazar; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Joseph R Marszalek; Jianjun Zhang; Sheri L Holmen; Michael T Tetzlaff; Michael A Davies Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Nagireddy Putluri; Ali Shojaie; Vihas T Vasu; Shaiju K Vareed; Srilatha Nalluri; Vasanta Putluri; Gagan Singh Thangjam; Katrin Panzitt; Christopher T Tallman; Charles Butler; Theodore R Sana; Steven M Fischer; Gabriel Sica; Daniel J Brat; Huidong Shi; Ganesh S Palapattu; Yair Lotan; Alon Z Weizer; Martha K Terris; Shahrokh F Shariat; George Michailidis; Arun Sreekumar Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nicole E Scharping; Ashley V Menk; Ryan D Whetstone; Xue Zeng; Greg M Delgoffe Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Rizwan Haq; Jonathan Shoag; Pedro Andreu-Perez; Satoru Yokoyama; Hannah Edelman; Glenn C Rowe; Dennie T Frederick; Aeron D Hurley; Abhinav Nellore; Andrew L Kung; Jennifer A Wargo; Jun S Song; David E Fisher; Zolt Arany; Hans R Widlund Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Daniel Fantus; Helong Dai; Yoshihiro Ono; Alicia Watson; Shinichiro Yokota; Kanishka Mohib; Osamu Yoshida; Mark A Ross; Simon C Watkins; Bala Ramaswami; Anna Valusjkikh; David M Rothstein; Angus W Thomson Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.939