| Literature DB >> 33574677 |
Mei Zhu1,2,3, Hongmei Wang1,2, Shujuan Zhou4, Jia Wei2, Naiqing Ding2, Jie Shao2, Lixia Yu2, Zhenqing Feng5,6, Baorui Liu1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: T cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are emerging as a potent cancer therapy that crosslinks tumor cells and T cells by simultaneously binding to tumor-associated antigen and CD3ε. However, immune inhibitory molecules can be remarkably upregulated after BsAbs treatment, leading to a suppressive tumor microenvironment and treatment resistance. This can be partially reversed by combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In our previous work, we successfully constructed the recombinant protein iRGD-antiCD3 and demonstrated that it promoted antitumor efficacy of transferred T cells by promoting T cell activation and infiltration.Entities:
Keywords: PD-1 blockade; combination therapy; cord blood-derived T cell; iRGD-antiCD3
Year: 2021 PMID: 33574677 PMCID: PMC7873023 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S291086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Figure 1iRGD-antiCD3 upregulated PD-1 on CD3+ cord blood-derived T cells and PD-L1 on tumor cells. Flow cytometry results displaying the relative expression level of PD-1 on gated CD3 T cells (A) and PD-L1 on gastric cancer cells (B). Effector T cells and target MKN45 tumor cells were incubated at an E:T ratio of 5:1 for 24 hr in the presence or absence of iRGD-anti-CD3. The experiments were repeated three times with cells from 3 healthy donors, and a representative result is shown. **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Figure 2The addition of PD-1 blockade restored activation of cord blood-derived T cells. (A) The co-culture supernatants were harvested and used for Th1/Th2 cytokines measurements using the BD CBA human Th1/Th2 flex set. Effector T cells and target MKN45 cells were incubated at an E:T ratio of 40:1 for 24 hr. All values were shown as mean ± the SEM of triplicate measurements and repeated three times with similar results. T cell activation was assessed by measuring the expression level of CD69 after 6 hr of incubation (B) and CD25 after 24 hr of incubation (C) on the gated CD3 T cells by flow cytometry. (D) Bar graphs of CD69 expression. (E) Bar graphs of CD25 expression. Data shown are shown as mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments, and a representative result is shown. n.s, not significant,***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Figure 3Combining iRGD-antiCD3 with PD-1 blockade improved tumor cell killing of cord blood-derived T cells. (A) The cytotoxic activity of effector T cells was measured using the CFSE/PI cytotoxicity assay. Effector T cells were co-cultured with CFSE-labeled tumor cells at E:T ratios of 5:1, 10:1, 20:1, and 40:1 for 24 hr. Then PI was added, and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) Line graph of flow cytometry results in A. (C) The cytotoxic activity was also measured using the LDH assay. The experiments were repeated three times with cells from 3 healthy donors, and a representative result is shown.
Figure 4Combining iRGD-antiCD3 with PD-1 blockade enhanced cytotoxicity of cord blood-derived T cells against MCTSs. The effect of combining PD-1 blockade and iRGD-antiCD3 on T-cell cytotoxicity against HGC27 tumor spheroids. (A) The representative maximum intensity projection images by confocal microscopy of HGC27 spheroids after treatments for 24 hr. Dead tumor cells in MCTSs fluoresce red (EthD-1), and live tumor cells fluoresce green (calcein-AM). (B) Growth inhibition assays of HGC27 MCTSs. (C) MCTSs lysis was evaluated by comparing the total area of live/dead cells in maximum intensity projection images. (D) Diameters of MCTSs after 72 hr treatment. Magnification, ×200; Scale bars, 100 μm. Data were represented as mean ± SEM; n = 3. ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05.
Figure 5Combining iRGD-antiCD3 with PD-1 blockade enhanced antitumor efficacy of cord blood-derived T cells in the peritoneal metastasis tumor model. (A) Schematic illustration of the treatment process in the peritoneal metastasis tumor model. (B) Quantification of tumor weights in all groups. (C) Body weight changes during the treatment process. Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 5. n.s, not significant; ***P < 0.001, *P < 0.05.