Literature DB >> 33574409

Interevent-time distribution and aftershock frequency in non-stationary induced seismicity.

Richard A J Post1,2, Matthias A J Michels3, Jean-Paul Ampuero4, Thibault Candela5, Peter A Fokker5,6, Jan-Diederik van Wees5,6, Remco W van der Hofstad1,2, Edwin R van den Heuvel7.   

Abstract

The initial footprint of an earthquake can be extended considerably by triggering of clustered aftershocks. Such earthquake-earthquake interactions have been studied extensively for data-rich, stationary natural seismicity. Induced seismicity, however, is intrinsically inhomogeneous in time and space and may have a limited catalog of events; this may hamper the distinction between human-induced background events and triggered aftershocks. Here we introduce a novel Gamma Accelerated-Failure-Time model for efficiently analyzing interevent-time distributions in such cases. It addresses the spatiotemporal variation and quantifies, per event, the probability of each event to have been triggered. Distentangling the obscuring aftershocks from the background events is a crucial step to better understand the causal relationship between operational parameters and non-stationary induced seismicity. Applied to the Groningen gas field in the North of the Netherlands, our model elucidates geological and operational drivers of seismicity and has been used to test for aftershock triggering. We find that the hazard rate in Groningen is indeed enhanced after each event and conclude that aftershock triggering cannot be ignored. In particular we find that the non-stationary interevent-time distribution is well described by our Gamma model. This model suggests that 27.0(± 8.5)% of the recorded events in the Groningen field can be attributed to triggering.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33574409     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82803-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  17 in total

1.  Long-term clustering, scaling, and universality in the temporal occurrence of earthquakes.

Authors:  Alvaro Corral
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  "Universal" distribution of interearthquake times explained.

Authors:  A Saichev; D Sornette
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Extending earthquakes' reach through cascading.

Authors:  David Marsan; Olivier Lengliné
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Anthropogenic seismicity rates and operational parameters at the Salton Sea Geothermal Field.

Authors:  Emily E Brodsky; Lia J Lajoie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Clustering analysis of seismicity and aftershock identification.

Authors:  Ilya Zaliapin; Andrei Gabrielov; Vladimir Keilis-Borok; Henry Wong
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Origin and nonuniversality of the earthquake interevent time distribution.

Authors:  Sarah Touati; Mark Naylor; Ian G Main
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Earthquake interevent time distribution for induced micro-, nano-, and picoseismicity.

Authors:  Jörn Davidsen; Grzegorz Kwiatek
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 9.161

8.  How earthquakes are induced.

Authors:  Thibault Candela; Brecht Wassing; Jan Ter Heege; Loes Buijze
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  SEDA: A software package for the Statistical Earthquake Data Analysis.

Authors:  A M Lombardi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Guang Zhai; Manoochehr Shirzaei; Michael Manga; Xiaowei Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.