Literature DB >> 33574385

Non-collinear Hox gene expression in bivalves and the evolution of morphological novelties in mollusks.

David A Salamanca-Díaz1, Andrew D Calcino1, André L de Oliveira2, Andreas Wanninger3.   

Abstract

Hox genes are key developmental regulators that are involved in establishing morphological features during animal ontogeny. They are commonly expressed along the anterior-posterior axis in a staggered, or collinear, fashion. In mollusks, the repertoire of body plans is widely diverse and current data suggest their involvement during development of landmark morphological traits in Conchifera, one of the two major lineages that comprises those taxa that originated from a uni-shelled ancestor (Monoplacophora, Gastropoda, Cephalopoda, Scaphopoda, Bivalvia). For most clades, and bivalves in particular, data on Hox gene expression throughout ontogeny are scarce. We thus investigated Hox expression during development of the quagga mussel, Dreissena rostriformis, to elucidate to which degree they might contribute to specific phenotypic traits as in other conchiferans. The Hox/ParaHox complement of Mollusca typically comprises 14 genes, 13 of which are present in bivalve genomes including Dreissena. We describe here expression of 9 Hox genes and the ParaHox gene Xlox during Dreissena development. Hox expression in Dreissena is first detected in the gastrula stage with widely overlapping expression domains of most genes. In the trochophore stage, Hox gene expression shifts towards more compact, largely mesodermal domains. Only few of these domains can be assigned to specific developing morphological structures such as Hox1 in the shell field and Xlox in the hindgut. We did not find traces of spatial or temporal staggered expression of Hox genes in Dreissena. Our data support the notion that Hox gene expression has been coopted independently, and to varying degrees, into lineage-specific structures in the respective conchiferan clades. The non-collinear mode of Hox expression in Dreissena might be a result of the low degree of body plan regionalization along the bivalve anterior-posterior axis as exemplified by the lack of key morphological traits such as a distinct head, cephalic tentacles, radula apparatus, and a simplified central nervous system.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33574385      PMCID: PMC7878502          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82122-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  65 in total

1.  Hox cluster disintegration with persistent anteroposterior order of expression in Oikopleura dioica.

Authors:  Hee-Chan Seo; Rolf Brudvik Edvardsen; Anne Dorthea Maeland; Marianne Bjordal; Marit Flo Jensen; Anette Hansen; Mette Flaat; Jean Weissenbach; Hans Lehrach; Patrick Wincker; Richard Reinhardt; Daniel Chourrout
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Involvement of Hox genes in shell morphogenesis in the encapsulated development of a top shell gastropod (Gibbula varia L.).

Authors:  Leyli Samadi; Gerhard Steiner
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation.

Authors:  P Dollé; J C Izpisúa-Belmonte; H Falkenstein; A Renucci; D Duboule
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-12-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Hox cluster genes and collinearities throughout the tree of animal life.

Authors:  Stephen J Gaunt
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.203

5.  Composition and genomic organization of arthropod Hox clusters.

Authors:  Ryan M Pace; Miodrag Grbić; Lisa M Nagy
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.250

6.  Bivalve-specific gene expansion in the pearl oyster genome: implications of adaptation to a sessile lifestyle.

Authors:  Takeshi Takeuchi; Ryo Koyanagi; Fuki Gyoja; Miyuki Kanda; Kanako Hisata; Manabu Fujie; Hiroki Goto; Shinichi Yamasaki; Kiyohito Nagai; Yoshiaki Morino; Hiroshi Miyamoto; Kazuyoshi Endo; Hirotoshi Endo; Hiromichi Nagasawa; Shigeharu Kinoshita; Shuichi Asakawa; Shugo Watabe; Noriyuki Satoh; Takeshi Kawashima
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.836

7.  ParaHox gene expression in larval and postlarval development of the polychaete Nereis virens (Annelida, Lophotrochozoa).

Authors:  Milana A Kulakova; Charles E Cook; Tatiana F Andreeva
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 1.978

8.  Unexpected co-linearity of Hox gene expression in an aculiferan mollusk.

Authors:  M Fritsch; T Wollesen; A L de Oliveira; A Wanninger
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  The octopus genome and the evolution of cephalopod neural and morphological novelties.

Authors:  Caroline B Albertin; Oleg Simakov; Therese Mitros; Z Yan Wang; Judit R Pungor; Eric Edsinger-Gonzales; Sydney Brenner; Clifton W Ragsdale; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  An Overview of Hox Genes in Lophotrochozoa: Evolution and Functionality.

Authors:  Marco Barucca; Adriana Canapa; Maria Assunta Biscotti
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2016-03-19
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparative Single-Cell Transcriptomics Reveals Novel Genes Involved in Bivalve Embryonic Shell Formation and Questions Ontogenetic Homology of Molluscan Shell Types.

Authors:  David A Salamanca-Díaz; Elena A Ritschard; Hannah Schmidbaur; Andreas Wanninger
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-06-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.