Literature DB >> 33573972

Human-animal relationship influences husbandry practices, animal welfare and productivity in pig farming.

F Pol1, F Kling-Eveillard2, F Champigneulle3, E Fresnay4, M Ducrocq4, V Courboulay4.   

Abstract

The nature of the relationship between humans and farm animals has multiple repercussions on the animals and the farmers and varies with farmers attitudes towards their animals. In particular, this relationship influences animal welfare and human working conditions. The present study, part of a larger research project investigating human-animal relationship (HAR) in pig farming and ways to improve it, had two objectives: 1) to investigate the HAR in a diversity of pig farming situations and to evaluate the possible correlation between farmer attitudes, pigs' reactions to humans, husbandry practices, animal health, welfare and productivity and 2) to find a way to rapidly assign a farmer to a profile, in order to better adapt course content during training sessions on HAR. The study focused on 52 farrow-to-finish farms and consisted of a semi-structured interview with the farmer, observations of the farmer in contact with his/her livestock, two human approach tests conducted on sows and growers and productivity data. Finally, a questionnaire was left at the farm to be filled out by all stockpersons on the farm. Interviews, analyzed using a thematic analysis followed by multiple correspondence analysis and ascendant hierarchical clustering, showed that some farmers develop husbandry practices to improve their HARs and identified three farmer profiles that have been named in relation to the place of the HAR in their profession: Profile 1 farmers for whom HAR is secondary in their work with their pigs, Profile 2 for whom the HAR is useful in their work with their pigs and Profile 3 for whom HAR is central in their work with their pigs. Logistic regression models of the relationships between behavioral tests and productivity data showed that confident sows produce and wean more piglets than fearful sows and that sows of Profile 3 farmers trust more humans than those of Profile 1 or 2 farmers. Farmers' responses to the questionnaire did not predict their profile assignment. Our results confirm the main role of the farmer's attitude towards animals on their farming practices, animal welfare and productivity. The farmers who have more confident pigs and better productivity are those for whom the farm animal is central to their profession, express the most pleasure in working with them and convey empathy for them.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral test; Farmer profile; Fear of humans; One welfare; Pig-human interaction

Year:  2020        PMID: 33573972     DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  8 in total

1.  Using Expert Elicitation for ranking hazards, promoters and animal-based measures for on-farm welfare assessment of indoor reared beef cattle: an Italian experience.

Authors:  Valentina Lorenzi; Carlo Angelo Sgoifo Rossi; Riccardo Compiani; Silvia Grossi; Luca Bolzoni; Francesca Mazza; Gianfilippo Alessio Clemente; Francesca Fusi; Luigi Bertocchi
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Economic feasibility of interventions targeted at decreasing piglet perinatal and pre-weaning mortality across European countries.

Authors:  Anna H Stygar; Ilias Chantziaras; Dominiek Maes; Vivi Aarestrup Moustsen; Dimitri De Meyer; Hélène Quesnel; Ilias Kyriazakis; Jarkko K Niemi
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Posture Detection of Individual Pigs Based on Lightweight Convolution Neural Networks and Efficient Channel-Wise Attention.

Authors:  Yizhi Luo; Zhixiong Zeng; Huazhong Lu; Enli Lv
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Adding a One Health approach to a research framework for minority health and health disparities.

Authors:  Brittany L Morgan; Mariana C Stern; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Monica Webb Hooper; Laura Fejerman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  A Nationwide Survey of Animal Science Students' Perceptions of Animal Welfare across Different Animal Categories at Institutions in the United States.

Authors:  Paxton Sullivan; Sage Mijares; Melissa Davis; Katrina Oselinsky; Catie Cramer; Noa Román-Muñiz; Lorann Stallones; Lily Edwards-Callaway
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 6.  The Potential of Understory Production Systems to Improve Laying Hen Welfare.

Authors:  Shaocong Yan; Chenyujing Yang; Lei Zhu; Yongji Xue
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Discrepancies between farmers' perceptions and actual animal welfare conditions on commercial pig farms.

Authors:  Eva Nadlučnik; Irena Golinar Oven; Iztok Tomažič; Jan Plut; Alenka Dovč; Marina Štukelj
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-09-29

Review 8.  Humans and Goats: Improving Knowledge for a Better Relationship.

Authors:  Stefania Celozzi; Monica Battini; Emanuela Prato-Previde; Silvana Mattiello
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.