Literature DB >> 33573698

Barriers to completing colonoscopy after a positive fecal occult blood test.

Revital Azulay1, Liora Valinsky2, Fabienne Hershkowitz3, Einat Elran4, Natan Lederman3, Revital Kariv4,5, Benjamin Braunstein4, Anthony Heymann3,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Early detection and treatment are essential. Screening using fecal occult blood tests has increased significantly, but adherence to colonoscopy follow-up is suboptimal, increasing CRC mortality risk. The aim of this study was to identify barriers to colonoscopy following a positive FOBT at the level of the patient, physician, organization and policymakers.
METHODS: This mixed methods study was conducted at two health care organizations in Israel. The study included retrospective analyses of 45,281 50-74 year-old members with positive fecal immunochemical tests from 2010 to 2014, and a survey of 772 patients with a positive test during 2015, with and without follow-up. The qualitative part of the study included focus groups with primary physicians and gastroenterologists and in-depth interviews with opinion leaders in healthcare.
RESULTS: Patient lack of comprehension regarding the test was the strongest predictor of non-adherence to follow-up. Older age, Arab ethnicity, and lower socio economic status significantly reduced adherence. We found no correlation with gender, marital status, patient activation, waiting time for appointments or distance from gastroenterology clinics. Primary care physicians underestimate non-adherence rates. They feel responsible for patient follow-up, but express lack of time and skills that will allow them to ensure adherence among their patients. Gastroenterologists do not consider fecal occult blood an effective tool for CRC detection, and believe that all patients should undergo colonoscopy. Opinion leaders in the healthcare field do not prioritize the issue of follow-up after a positive screening test for colorectal cancer, although they understand the importance.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified important barriers that need to be addressed to improve the effectiveness of the screening program. Targeted interventions for populations at risk for non-adherence, specifically for those with low literacy levels, and better explanation of the need for follow-up as a routine need to be set in place. Lack of agreement between screening recommendations and gastroenterologist opinion, and lack of awareness among healthcare authority figures negatively impact the screening program need to be addressed at the organizational and national level. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the IRB in both participating organizations (Meuhedet Health Care Institutional Review Board #02-2-5-15, Maccabi Healthcare Institutional Review Board BBI-0025-16). Participant consent was waived by both IRB's.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Cancer; Colonoscopy; Positive colorectal cancer screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 33573698      PMCID: PMC7879608          DOI: 10.1186/s13584-021-00444-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res        ISSN: 2045-4015


  41 in total

1.  Adherence to follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test in an organized colorectal cancer screening program in Korea, 2004-2008.

Authors:  Kui Son Choi; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Jae Kwan Jun; Aesun Shin; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  Ontario's ColonCancerCheck: results from canada's first province-wide colorectal cancer screening program.

Authors:  Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat; Nancy N Baxter; Loraine D Marrett; Arlinda Ruco; Nancy Lewis; Julia Gao
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Eliminating disparities in cancer screening and follow-up of abnormal results: what will it take?

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Sharon Humiston; Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Amna Idris; Patricia Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2011-02

4.  Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up.

Authors:  David A Etzioni; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein; Martin L Lee; Clifford Y Ko; Robert H Brook; Patricia H Parkerton; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  How to increase colorectal cancer screening rates in practice.

Authors:  Mona Sarfaty; Richard Wender
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Eldon R Mahoney; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Five-year experience of organized colorectal cancer screening in a Swedish population - increased compliance with age, female gender, and subsequent screening round.

Authors:  Johannes Blom; Sini Kilpeläinen; Rolf Hultcrantz; Sven Törnberg
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Modifiable Failures in the Colorectal Cancer Screening Process and Their Association With Risk of Death.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Stacey A Fedewa; Theodore R Levin; Christopher D Jensen; Chelsea Saia; Alexis M Zebrowski; Virginia P Quinn; Katharine A Rendle; Ann G Zauber; Tracy A Becerra-Culqui; Shivan J Mehta; Robert H Fletcher; Joanne Schottinger; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Psychometric properties of the hebrew translation of the patient activation measure (PAM-13).

Authors:  Racheli Magnezi; Saralee Glasser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.

Authors:  Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Carlene Wilson; Joanne M Osborne; Stephen R Cole; Ingrid Flight; Graeme P Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Barriers associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test results in a safety-net system: A mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Jason Kao; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa D Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-05-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.