Liesa Heidi Möller1, Winnie Pradel2, Tomasz Gedrange1, Ute Ulrike Botzenhart3. 1. Department of Orthodontics, Carl Gustav Carus Campus TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Haus 28, 01307, Dresden, Germany. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dresden University Hospital, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. 3. Department of Orthodontics, Carl Gustav Carus Campus TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, Haus 28, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Ute.Botzenhart@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The distribution of dental abnormalities among cleft patients concerning cleft type frequently poses ambiguity wherefore the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in an exemplary German cleft population dependent on the cleft type. METHODS: Radiographs and dental records of cleft patients, which had been treated and followed up in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Campus, Dresden, Germany (investigation period of 22 years) were evaluated concerning hypodontia and supernumerary teeth dependent on the cleft type. Out of 386 records, 108 patients met the inclusion criteria: non-syndromic cleft of the alveolus with or without palate (CL/P), at least one clear panoramic x-ray, sufficient dental records. Statistical analysis was performed using x-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: Hypodontia was more frequent (54/50%) than supernumerary teeth (36/33.3%) and was more common in bilateral clefts of the lip and palate (BCLP) (70.1%) than in unilateral clefts of the lip and palate (UCLP) (51.6%) or clefts of the lip and alveolus (CLA) (34.5%) (p << 0.001). There was an average of 0.9 missing teeth per patient, thereof the upper lateral incisor was most often affected (23.2%). In contrast, supernumerary teeth were more frequent in CLA (51.7%; p = 0.014) than UCLP (29.0%) and BCLP patients (17.6%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence for numerical dental anomalies was significantly different among the cleft types. Hypodontia significantly increased with the extend of the cleft, whereas the prevalence of supernumerary teeth decreased.
BACKGROUND: The distribution of dental abnormalities among cleft patients concerning cleft type frequently poses ambiguity wherefore the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of hypodontia and supernumerary teeth in an exemplary German cleft population dependent on the cleft type. METHODS: Radiographs and dental records of cleft patients, which had been treated and followed up in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Campus, Dresden, Germany (investigation period of 22 years) were evaluated concerning hypodontia and supernumerary teeth dependent on the cleft type. Out of 386 records, 108 patients met the inclusion criteria: non-syndromic cleft of the alveolus with or without palate (CL/P), at least one clear panoramic x-ray, sufficient dental records. Statistical analysis was performed using x-square and binominal test (p ≤ 0.05). RESULTS:Hypodontia was more frequent (54/50%) than supernumerary teeth (36/33.3%) and was more common in bilateral clefts of the lip and palate (BCLP) (70.1%) than in unilateral clefts of the lip and palate (UCLP) (51.6%) or clefts of the lip and alveolus (CLA) (34.5%) (p << 0.001). There was an average of 0.9 missing teeth per patient, thereof the upper lateral incisor was most often affected (23.2%). In contrast, supernumerary teeth were more frequent in CLA (51.7%; p = 0.014) than UCLP (29.0%) and BCLPpatients (17.6%). CONCLUSION: The prevalence for numerical dental anomalies was significantly different among the cleft types. Hypodontia significantly increased with the extend of the cleft, whereas the prevalence of supernumerary teeth decreased.
Authors: M Phan; F Conte; K D Khandelwal; C W Ockeloen; T Bartzela; T Kleefstra; H van Bokhoven; M Rubini; H Zhou; C E L Carels Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: José Rubén Herrera-Atoche; Nieves Aime Huerta-García; Mauricio Escoffié-Ramírez; Fernando Javier Aguilar-Pérez; Fernando Javier Aguilar-Ayala; Eduardo Andrés Lizarraga-Colomé; Gabriel Eduardo Colomé-Ruiz; Iván Daniel Zúñiga-Herrera Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 1.817