Literature DB >> 33573638

What do primary care staff know and do about blood borne virus testing and care for migrant patients? A national survey.

Rachel Roche1,2, Ruth Simmons3,4, Alison F Crawshaw5,6, Pip Fisher7, Manish Pareek8, Will Morton9, Theresa Shryane10, Kristina Poole10, Arpana Verma7, Ines Campos-Matos5,11, Sema Mandal3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: UK migrants born in intermediate to high prevalence areas for blood borne viruses (BBV) including hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV are at increased risk of these infections. National guidance from Public Health England (PHE) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends primary care test this population to increase diagnoses and treatment. We aimed to investigate primary care professionals' knowledge of entitlements, and perceptions of barriers, for migrants accessing healthcare, and their policies, and reported practices and influences on provision of BBV testing in migrants.
METHODS: A pre-piloted questionnaire was distributed between October 2017 and January 2018 to primary care professionals attending the Royal College of General Practitioners and Best Practice in Primary Care conferences, via a link in PHE Vaccine Updates and through professional networks. Survey results were analysed to give descriptive statistics, and responses by respondent characteristics: profession, region, practice size, and frequency of seeing migrant patients. Responses were considered on a per question basis with response rates for each question presented with the results.
RESULTS: Four hundred fourteen questionnaires were returned with responses varying by question, representing an estimated 5.7% of English GP practices overall. Only 14% of respondents' practices systematically identified migrant patients for testing. Universal opt-out testing was offered to newly registering migrant patients by 18% of respondents for hepatitis B, 17% for hepatitis C and 21% for HIV. Knowledge of healthcare entitlements varied; fewer clinical staff knew that general practice consultations were free to all migrants (76%) than for urgent care (88%). Performance payment structure (76%) had the greatest reported influence on testing, followed by PHE and Clinical Commissioning Group recommendations (73% each). Language and culture were perceived to be the biggest barriers to accessing care.
CONCLUSIONS: BBV testing for migrant patients in primary care is usually ad hoc, which is likely to lead to testing opportunities being missed. Knowledge of migrants' entitlements to healthcare varies and could affect access to care. Interventions to improve professional awareness and identification of migrant patients requiring BBV testing are needed to reduce the undiagnosed and untreated burden of BBVs in this vulnerable population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood borne virus; General practice; HIV; Healthcare access; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C; Migrants; Screening; Testing; UK

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33573638      PMCID: PMC7877334          DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10068-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Public Health        ISSN: 1471-2458            Impact factor:   3.295


  29 in total

1.  The importance of teaching clinicians when and how to work with interpreters.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Jacobs; Lisa C Diamond; Lisa Stevak
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-12-29

2.  Enhancing consultations with interpreters: learning more about how.

Authors:  Joe Kai
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Promotion of rapid testing for HIV in primary care (RHIVA2): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Werner Leber; Heather McMullen; Jane Anderson; Nadine Marlin; Andreia C Santos; Stephen Bremner; Kambiz Boomla; Sally Kerry; Danna Millett; Sifiso Mguni; Sarah Creighton; Jose Figueroa; Richard Ashcroft; Graham Hart; Valerie Delpech; Alison Brown; Graeme Rooney; Maria Sampson; Adrian Martineau; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Chris Griffiths
Journal:  Lancet HIV       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 12.767

4.  Late diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection in the Chronic Hepatitis Cohort Study (CHeCS): Missed opportunities for intervention.

Authors:  Anne C Moorman; Jian Xing; Stephen Ko; Loralee B Rupp; Fujie Xu; Stuart C Gordon; Mei Lu; Philip R Spradling; Eyasu H Teshale; Joseph A Boscarino; Vinutha Vijayadeva; Mark A Schmidt; Scott D Holmberg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Impact of a nurse-led enhanced monitoring, management and contact tracing intervention for chronic hepatitis B in England, 2015-2017.

Authors:  Kazim Beebeejaun; Zahin Amin-Chowdhury; Louise Letley; Edna Kara; Beauty Mahange; Kate Harrington; Jacqui Checkley; Sultan Salimee; Kristina Poole; Samreen Ijaz; Graeme Alexander; Mary Ramsay; Sema Mandal; Michael Edelstein
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.728

6.  The unmet need for interpreting provision in UK primary care.

Authors:  Paramjit S Gill; Jacqueline Beavan; Melanie Calvert; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Low levels of HIV test coverage in clinical settings in the U.K.: a systematic review of adherence to 2008 guidelines.

Authors:  Rahma Elmahdi; Sarah M Gerver; Gabriela Gomez Guillen; Sarah Fidler; Graham Cooke; Helen Ward
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Language support for linguistic minority chronic hepatitis B/C patients: an exploratory study of availability and clinicians' perceptions of language barriers in six European countries.

Authors:  Abby M Falla; Irene K Veldhuijzen; Amena A Ahmad; Miriam Levi; Jan Hendrik Richardus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Integrated screening of migrants for multiple infectious diseases: Qualitative study of a city-wide programme.

Authors:  Helen Eborall; Fatimah Wobi; Kate Ellis; Janet Willars; Ibrahim Abubakar; Chris Griffiths; Manish Pareek
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-04-18

10.  Identifying social factors amongst older individuals in linked electronic health records: An assessment in a population based study.

Authors:  Anu Jain; Albert J van Hoek; Jemma L Walker; Rohini Mathur; Liam Smeeth; Sara L Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Screening for neglected tropical diseases and other infections in refugee and asylum-seeker populations in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Paola Cinardo; Olivia Farrant; Kimberlee Gunn; Allison Ward; Sarah Eisen; Nicky Longley
Journal:  Ther Adv Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.