D R Bouchard1,2, J V Olthuis3, V Bouffard-Levasseur4, C Shannon5, T McDonald6, M Sénéchal7,5. 1. Cardiometabolic Exercise & Lifestyle Laboratory, Fredericton, NB, Canada. Danielle.bouchard@unb.ca. 2. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, E3B 4J9, Canada. Danielle.bouchard@unb.ca. 3. Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada. 4. Secteur Éducation et kinésiologie, Université de Moncton, Fredericton, NB, Canada. 5. Faculty of Kinesiology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, E3B 4J9, Canada. 6. Faculty of Law, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada. 7. Cardiometabolic Exercise & Lifestyle Laboratory, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A peer-led exercise program is one way to empower people sharing similar characteristics to encourage others to be active, but there is a lack of evidence that these programs have physical function and other benefits when delivered to ageing adults. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial lasting 12 weeks proposed an exercise peer-led program offered to 31 adults aged 50 and above, twice a week, by a trained leader of the same age from March to May 2019. The program was offered for free with limited space and equipment. Valid tests of physical function (e.g., 30-s chair stand, 6-min walk test) were used to assess the functional benefits. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using self-reported questionnaires and metabolic outcomes via a fasted blood draw. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between pre-and post-values in most physical function tests in the intervention group (all p < 0.05). When adjusted for potential confounders, the intervention group was significantly associated with a more significant improvement on the chair stand test (ß = .26; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.26), the arm curl (ß = .29; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.49), as well as the 6-min walk test (ß = -.14; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.62) compared with the control group. Using repetitive measures generalized linear model, the interaction between the changes and the group was significant for all three tests. Benefits were also observed for participants' stress level and perceived health in the intervention group compared to the control. Finally, no significant difference was observed between groups for metabolic health. CONCLUSIONS: The current work suggests that a 12-week peer-led exercise program can improve physical function for adults age 50 and above. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03799952 (ClinicalTrials.gov) 12/20/2018.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: A peer-led exercise program is one way to empower people sharing similar characteristics to encourage others to be active, but there is a lack of evidence that these programs have physical function and other benefits when delivered to ageing adults. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial lasting 12 weeks proposed an exercise peer-led program offered to 31 adults aged 50 and above, twice a week, by a trained leader of the same age from March to May 2019. The program was offered for free with limited space and equipment. Valid tests of physical function (e.g., 30-s chair stand, 6-min walk test) were used to assess the functional benefits. Psychosocial outcomes were assessed using self-reported questionnaires and metabolic outcomes via a fasted blood draw. RESULTS: A significant difference was found between pre-and post-values in most physical function tests in the intervention group (all p < 0.05). When adjusted for potential confounders, the intervention group was significantly associated with a more significant improvement on the chair stand test (ß = .26; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.26), the arm curl (ß = .29; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.49), as well as the 6-min walk test (ß = -.14; p < 0.001; r2 = 0.62) compared with the control group. Using repetitive measures generalized linear model, the interaction between the changes and the group was significant for all three tests. Benefits were also observed for participants' stress level and perceived health in the intervention group compared to the control. Finally, no significant difference was observed between groups for metabolic health. CONCLUSIONS: The current work suggests that a 12-week peer-led exercise program can improve physical function for adults age 50 and above. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03799952 (ClinicalTrials.gov) 12/20/2018.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ageing adults; Exercise; Peer-led; Physical activity; Physical function
Authors: G Neil Thomas; Duncan J Macfarlane; Boliang Guo; Bernard M Y Cheung; Sarah M McGhee; Kee-Lee Chou; Jonathan J Deeks; Tai Hing Lam; Brian Tomlinson Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Birgit Wurzer; Debra Lynn Waters; Leigh Anne Hale; Sophia Leon de la Barra Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Maike Neuhaus; Tarli Young; Laura J Ferris; Charlotte L M Grimmel; Natasha Reid Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.614