Literature DB >> 33573137

Maxwell Equations without a Polarization Field, Using a Paradigm from Biophysics.

Robert S Eisenberg1,2.   

Abstract

When forces are applied to matter, the distribution of mass changes. Similarly, when an electric field is applied to matter with charge, the distribution of charge changes. The change in the distribution of charge (when a local electric field is applied) might in general be called the induced charge. When the change in charge is simply related to the applied local electric field, the polarization field P is widely used to describe the induced charge. This approach does not allow electrical measurements (in themselves) to determine the structure of the polarization fields. Many polarization fields will produce the same electrical forces because only the divergence of polarization enters Maxwell's first equation, relating charge and electric forces and field. The curl of any function can be added to a polarization field P without changing the electric field at all. The divergence of the curl is always zero. Additional information is needed to specify the curl and thus the structure of the P field. When the structure of charge changes substantially with the local electric field, the induced charge is a nonlinear and time dependent function of the field and P is not a useful framework to describe either the electrical or structural basis-induced charge. In the nonlinear, time dependent case, models must describe the charge distribution and how it varies as the field changes. One class of models has been used widely in biophysics to describe field dependent charge, i.e., the phenomenon of nonlinear time dependent induced charge, called 'gating current' in the biophysical literature. The operational definition of gating current has worked well in biophysics for fifty years, where it has been found to makes neurons respond sensitively to voltage. Theoretical estimates of polarization computed with this definition fit experimental data. I propose that the operational definition of gating current be used to define voltage and time dependent induced charge, although other definitions may be needed as well, for example if the induced charge is fundamentally current dependent. Gating currents involve substantial changes in structure and so need to be computed from a combination of electrodynamics and mechanics because everything charged interacts with everything charged as well as most things mechanical. It may be useful to separate the classical polarization field as a component of the total induced charge, as it is in biophysics. When nothing is known about polarization, it is necessary to use an approximate representation of polarization with a dielectric constant that is a single real positive number. This approximation allows important results in some cases, e.g., design of integrated circuits in silicon semiconductors, but can be seriously misleading in other cases, e.g., ionic solutions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dielectric constant; gating current; maxwell equations; polarization

Year:  2021        PMID: 33573137      PMCID: PMC7912333          DOI: 10.3390/e23020172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Entropy (Basel)        ISSN: 1099-4300            Impact factor:   2.524


  52 in total

1.  Binding and selectivity in L-type calcium channels: a mean spherical approximation.

Authors:  W Nonner; L Catacuzzeno; B Eisenberg
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Impedance spectroscopy.

Authors:  J R Macdonald
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  A lattice relaxation algorithm for three-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Planck theory with application to ion transport through the gramicidin A channel.

Authors:  M G Kurnikova; R D Coalson; P Graf; A Nitzan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Voltage dependent charge movement of skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling.

Authors:  M F Schneider; W K Chandler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Voltage-dependent gating in K channels: experimental results and quantitative models.

Authors:  Luigi Catacuzzeno; Luigi Sforna; Fabio Franciolini
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Gating currents from a nonconducting mutant reveal open-closed conformations in Shaker K+ channels.

Authors:  E Perozo; R MacKinnon; F Bezanilla; E Stefani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Distribution and kinetics of membrane dielectric polarization. II. Frequency domain studies of gating currents.

Authors:  J M Fernández; F Bezanilla; R E Taylor
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Continuum Gating Current Models Computed with Consistent Interactions.

Authors:  Tzyy-Leng Horng; Robert S Eisenberg; Chun Liu; Francisco Bezanilla
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Sodium and gating current time shifts resulting from changes in initial conditions.

Authors:  R E Taylor; F Bezanilla
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Concealing arbitrary objects remotely with multi-folded transformation optics.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Hamza Ahmad Madni; Ran Hao; Xianmin Zhang; Xu Liu; Erping Li; Hongsheng Chen
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 17.782

View more
  1 in total

1.  Introduction to the Physics of Ionic Conduction in Narrow Biological and Artificial Channels.

Authors:  Dmitry G Luchinsky; Peter V E McClintock
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.524

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.