Literature DB >> 33572726

Dyadic Invariance of the Positive Sexuality Scale in Chilean Heterosexual Couples.

Giulia Casu1, Mónica Guzmán-González2, Ricardo Espinoza-Tapia2, Lusmenia Garrido-Rojas3, Jaime Barrientos4, Fabiola Gómez5.   

Abstract

Gender differences in sexuality-related dimensions have long been investigated in close relationship research. An important assumption when comparing values across gender in dyadic research is that both partners conceptualize the construct under investigation in the same way. Thus, issues of measurement invariance should be considered when working with dyadic data. The aim of the present study was to test the dyadic invariance of the Positive Sexuality Scale (PSS) to assess an individual's sense of happiness and fulfillment with his/her sexual expression. The PSS was completed by 166 Chilean heterosexual couples, and measurement invariance was tested using confirmatory factor analysis within a dyadic framework. Configural, metric, scalar, and partial strict measurement invariance were supported for the PSS original one-factor model. No between-partner difference was found in the PSS latent factor mean. The functioning of the PSS and the meaning attributed to positive sexuality were the same for both partners. Hence, variations in the PSS levels between both partners in heterosexual couples can be interpreted as true mean differences rather than measurement artifacts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dyadic framework; heterosexual couples; measurement invariance; positive sexuality

Year:  2021        PMID: 33572726      PMCID: PMC7908503          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  13 in total

1.  Degree and Direction of Sexual Desire Discrepancy are Linked to Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Transitioning to Parenthood.

Authors:  Natalie O Rosen; Kristen Bailey; Amy Muise
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2017-05-19

2.  Development and initial validation of the Positive Sexuality Scale for female adults.

Authors:  Giulia Casu
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.036

3.  Correction to: Emotional intimacy and sexual well-being in aging European couples: a cross-cultural mediation analysis.

Authors:  Aleksandar Štulhofer; Tanja Jurin; Cynthia Graham; Erick Janssen; Bente Træen
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2020-05-19

4.  Factors predicting the probability of initiating sexual intercourse by context and sex.

Authors:  Trond Viggo Grøntvedt; Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair; Mehmet Mehmetoglu
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2015-04-30

5.  The object of sexual desire: examining the "what" in "what do you desire?".

Authors:  Kristen Mark; Debby Herbenick; Dennis Fortenberry; Stephanie Sanders; Michael Reece
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Gender Differences in the Structure of Marital Quality.

Authors:  Christopher R Beam; Katherine Marcus; Eric Turkheimer; Robert E Emery
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Sexual Satisfaction Among Couples: The Role of Attachment Orientation and Sexual Motives.

Authors:  Ateret Gewirtz-Meydan; Ricky Finzi-Dottan
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2017-02-06

8.  Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership.

Authors:  Dietrich Klusmann
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2002-06

9.  Sexual well-being and perceived stress in couples transitioning to parenthood: A dyadic analysis.

Authors:  Inês M Tavares; Hera E Schlagintweit; Pedro J Nobre; Natalie O Rosen
Journal:  Int J Clin Health Psychol       Date:  2019-08-13

10.  Editorial: Measurement Invariance.

Authors:  Rens Van De Schoot; Peter Schmidt; Alain De Beuckelaer; Kimberley Lek; Marielle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.