Literature DB >> 33572506

Rodent Ectoparasites in the Middle East: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Md Mazharul Islam1,2, Elmoubashar Farag3, Khalid Eltom4, Mohammad Mahmudul Hassan5, Devendra Bansal3, Francis Schaffner6, Jolyon M Medlock7, Hamad Al-Romaihi3, Zilungile Mkhize-Kwitshana8,9.   

Abstract

Rodents carry many ectoparasites, such as ticks, lice, fleas, and mites, which have potential public health importance. Middle Eastern countries are hotspots for many emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases, such as plague, leishmaniasis, Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever, and Q fever, due to their ecological, socioeconomic, and political diversity. Rodent ectoparasites can act as vectors for many of these pathogens. Knowledge of rodent ectoparasites is of prime importance in controlling rodent ectoparasite-borne zoonotic diseases in this region. The current systematic review and meta-analysis performs a comprehensive synthesis of the available knowledge, providing an evidence-based overview of the ectoparasites detected on rodents in Middle Eastern countries. Following a systematic search in Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science, a total of 113 published articles on rodent ectoparasites were studied and analyzed. A total of 87 rodent species were documented, from which Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Rattus rattus were found to be the most common. Fleas were the most reported ectoparasites (87 articles), followed by mites (53), ticks (44), and lice (25). Xenopsylla cheopis, Polyplax spinulosa, Ornithonyssus bacoti, and Hyalomma rhipicephaloides were the most commonly described fleas, lice, mites, and ticks, respectively. Based on the reviewed articles, the median flea, louse, mite, and tick indices were highest in Israel (4.15), Egypt (1.39), Egypt (1.27), and Saudi Arabia (1.17), respectively. Quantitative meta-analysis, using a random-effects model, determined the overall pooled flea prevalence in the Middle East as 40% (95% CI: 25-55, I2 = 100%, p < 0.00001), ranging between 13% (95% CI: 0-30, I2 = 95%, p < 0.00001) in Iran and 59% (95% CI: 42-77, I2 = 75%, p < 0.00001) in Israel. The overall pooled louse prevalence was found to be 30% (95% CI: 13-47, I2 = 100%, p < 0.00001), ranging between 25% in Iran (95% CI: 1-50, I2 = 99%) and 38% in Egypt (95% CI: 7-68, I2 = 100%). In the case of mites, the pooled prevalence in this region was 33% (95% CI: 11-55, I2 = 100%, p < 0.00001), where the country-specific prevalence estimates were 30% in Iran (95% CI: 4-56, I2 = 99%) and 32% in Egypt (95% CI: 0-76, I2 = 100%). For ticks, the overall prevalence was found to be 25% (95% CI: 2-47, I2 = 100%, p < 0.00001), ranging from 16% in Iran (95% CI: 7-25, I2 = 74%) to 42% in Egypt (95% CI: 1-85, I2 = 100%). The control of rodent ectoparasites should be considered to reduce their adverse effects. Using the One Health strategy, rodent control, and precisely control of the most common rodent species, i.e., Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, and Rattus rattus, should be considered to control the rodent-borne ectoparasites in this region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Middle East; ectoparasites; fleas; lice; meta-analysis; mites; rodents; systematic review; ticks

Year:  2021        PMID: 33572506      PMCID: PMC7911898          DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10020139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathogens        ISSN: 2076-0817


  142 in total

1.  Relapsing fever in Jordan.

Authors:  B BABUDIERI
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1957       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 2.  Vectorial role of some dermanyssoid mites (Acari, Mesostigmata, Dermanyssoidea).

Authors:  C Valiente Moro; C Chauve; L Zenner
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Louse-borne bacterial pathogens in lice (Phthiraptera) of rodents and cattle from Egypt.

Authors:  Will K Reeves; Daniel E Szumlas; John R Moriarity; Amanda D Loftis; Magda M Abbassy; Ibrahim M Helmy; Gregory A Dasch
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.276

4.  A comparison of bats and rodents as reservoirs of zoonotic viruses: are bats special?

Authors:  Angela D Luis; David T S Hayman; Thomas J O'Shea; Paul M Cryan; Amy T Gilbert; Juliet R C Pulliam; James N Mills; Mary E Timonin; Craig K R Willis; Andrew A Cunningham; Anthony R Fooks; Charles E Rupprecht; James L N Wood; Colleen T Webb
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Eczematous dermatitis caused by Dermanyssus americanus.

Authors:  S Naltsas; S J Hodge; G J Gataky; L G Owen
Journal:  Cutis       Date:  1980-04

6.  Infestation rate of tick, mite and lice among rodent species in Menoufia governorate, Egypt.

Authors:  Micheal W Mikhail; Mohamed Ismail Soliman; El-Halim Azza S Abd
Journal:  J Egypt Soc Parasitol       Date:  2010-08

7.  Density-dependent host selection in ectoparasites: an application of isodar theory to fleas parasitizing rodents.

Authors:  Boris R Krasnov; Irina S Khokhlova; Georgy I Shenbrot
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) in occupational asthma of poultry workers.

Authors:  I Lutsky; S Bar-Sela
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-10-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Dermatitis in humans associated with the mites Pyemotes tritici, Dermanyssus gallinae, Ornithonyssus bacoti and Androlaelaps casalis in Israel.

Authors:  S Rosen; I Yeruham; Y Braverman
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.739

Review 10.  A review of the biology, ecology, and control of the northern fowl mite, Ornithonyssus sylviarum (Acari: Macronyssidae).

Authors:  Amy C Murillo; Bradley A Mullens
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.738

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automatic barcode gap discovery reveals diverse clades of Rhipicephalus spp. and Haemaphysalis spp. ticks from small mammals in 'Asir, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Samia Q Alghamdi; Van Lun Low; Hadil A Alkathiry; Abdulaziz N Alagaili; John W McGarry; Benjamin L Makepeace
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 3.876

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.