Sidrah Shah1, Mikolaj Kutka1, Kathryn Lees2, Charlotte Abson2, Maher Hadaki2, Deirdre Cooke1, Cherie Neill1, Matin Sheriff3, Afroditi Karathanasi1, Stergios Boussios1,4,5. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, Kent, UK. 2. Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone ME16 9QQ, Kent, UK. 3. Department of Urology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, Kent, UK. 4. King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London SE1 9RT, UK. 5. AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is one of the most devastating complications of cancer. This event requires rapid decision-making on the part of several specialists, given the risk of permanent spinal cord injury or death. The goals of treatment in spinal metastases are pain control and improvement of neurological function. There can be challenges in delivering prompt diagnosis and treatment in a secondary care setting. We have reflected on the experience of managing MSCC in a district general setting. AIM: Our retrospective audit identified 53 patients with suspected MSCC who entered the relevant pathway from April 2017 to March 2018 at Medway, United Kingdom (UK). Our audit standards were set out by Medway Maritime Hospital and Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust MSCC working group members, using a combination of published evidence and best practice. RESULTS: The patients with suspected MSCC were 53 and 29 of them (54.7%) had confirmed MSCC. The most common malignancies within the confirmed MSCC were lung (11 patients, 37.9%), breast (5 patients 17.2%), and renal (3 patients, 10.3%), followed by prostate, myeloma and carcinoma of unknown primary (2 patients (6.9%) each), as well as pancreatic, colorectal, lymphoma and, bladder (1 patient (3.4%) each). A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed in 48 patients (90.5%); the majority (31 patients, 64.6%) underwent the MRI within the first 24 h, whereas 3 patients had the investigation between 24 and 72 h from the admission. Among the 29 patients with confirmed MSCC, 6 (20.6%) were treated with surgical decompression, while 20 (69%) received radiotherapy (RT) and 3 (10.3%) best supportive care, respectively. Median time to surgery was 5 days (ranged between 2 and 8 days), whereas for RT 44.4 h (ranged between 24 and 72 h). Finally, all 3 patients that decided on symptom control were referred to a palliative care team within the first 24 h following the MRI scan. CONCLUSIONS: MSCC is frequently presented outside tertiary care. This may cause subsequent delays in investigation, diagnosis, and treatment, which can be improved by following a fast track referral pathway.
INTRODUCTION: Malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC) is one of the most devastating complications of cancer. This event requires rapid decision-making on the part of several specialists, given the risk of permanent spinal cord injury or death. The goals of treatment in spinal metastases are pain control and improvement of neurological function. There can be challenges in delivering prompt diagnosis and treatment in a secondary care setting. We have reflected on the experience of managing MSCC in a district general setting. AIM: Our retrospective audit identified 53 patients with suspected MSCC who entered the relevant pathway from April 2017 to March 2018 at Medway, United Kingdom (UK). Our audit standards were set out by Medway Maritime Hospital and Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust MSCC working group members, using a combination of published evidence and best practice. RESULTS: The patients with suspected MSCC were 53 and 29 of them (54.7%) had confirmed MSCC. The most common malignancies within the confirmed MSCC were lung (11 patients, 37.9%), breast (5 patients 17.2%), and renal (3 patients, 10.3%), followed by prostate, myeloma and carcinoma of unknown primary (2 patients (6.9%) each), as well as pancreatic, colorectal, lymphoma and, bladder (1 patient (3.4%) each). A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan was performed in 48 patients (90.5%); the majority (31 patients, 64.6%) underwent the MRI within the first 24 h, whereas 3 patients had the investigation between 24 and 72 h from the admission. Among the 29 patients with confirmed MSCC, 6 (20.6%) were treated with surgical decompression, while 20 (69%) received radiotherapy (RT) and 3 (10.3%) best supportive care, respectively. Median time to surgery was 5 days (ranged between 2 and 8 days), whereas for RT 44.4 h (ranged between 24 and 72 h). Finally, all 3patients that decided on symptom control were referred to a palliative care team within the first 24 h following the MRI scan. CONCLUSIONS: MSCC is frequently presented outside tertiary care. This may cause subsequent delays in investigation, diagnosis, and treatment, which can be improved by following a fast track referral pathway.
Authors: Mark H Bilsky; Ilya Laufer; Daryl R Fourney; Michael Groff; Meic H Schmidt; Peter Paul Varga; Frank D Vrionis; Yoshiya Yamada; Peter C Gerszten; Timothy R Kuklo Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2010-09
Authors: Roy A Patchell; Phillip A Tibbs; William F Regine; Richard Payne; Stephen Saris; Richard J Kryscio; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Byron Young Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Aug 20-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: P Levack; J Graham; D Collie; R Grant; J Kidd; I Kunkler; A Gibson; D Hurman; N McMillan; R Rampling; L Slider; P Statham; D Summers Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Ruben Van den Brande; Erwin Mj Cornips; Marc Peeters; Piet Ost; Charlotte Billiet; Erik Van de Kelft Journal: J Bone Oncol Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 4.491