Carol Byrd-Bredbenner1, Kaitlyn Eck1, Virginia Quick2. 1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Environmental & Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, 26 Nichol Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. 2. Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Environmental & Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, 26 Nichol Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. Electronic address: vquick@njaes.rutgers.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7 & GAD-2) scales are reliable and valid instruments for assessing generalized anxiety symptoms in the general and clinical populations. However, little attention has been given to the psychometric qualities of GAD-7 and reduced length versions in a diverse sample of young adult college students stratified by sex. Thus, the aims for this study are to test psychometric properties and normative values of GAD-7, GAD-2, and GAD-Mini scales. METHOD: U.S university students (N = 4128; females n = 2527, males n = 1601) ages 18-26 years completed an online survey composed of the GAD-7, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), and demographic questions. RESULTS: Exploratory principal components analysis yielded a one factor solution for GAD-7 across sexes. In reducing scale length, iterative confirmatory principal components analyses stratified by sex revealed a two-item scale (GAD-Mini) with high factor loading items, internal consistency (α ≥ 0.85), and construct validity with PHQ-2 (r ≥ 0.55). Normative data indicate that regardless of whether GAD-7, GAD-2, or GAD-Mini scores were considered, about three-quarters of men and two-thirds of women scored below the reasonable cut-points in screening for GAD. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study may help health care providers and researchers better understand the interpretation of these scales among university students when screening for GAD.
OBJECTIVE: The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7 & GAD-2) scales are reliable and valid instruments for assessing generalized anxiety symptoms in the general and clinical populations. However, little attention has been given to the psychometric qualities of GAD-7 and reduced length versions in a diverse sample of young adult college students stratified by sex. Thus, the aims for this study are to test psychometric properties and normative values of GAD-7, GAD-2, and GAD-Mini scales. METHOD: U.S university students (N = 4128; females n = 2527, males n = 1601) ages 18-26 years completed an online survey composed of the GAD-7, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), and demographic questions. RESULTS: Exploratory principal components analysis yielded a one factor solution for GAD-7 across sexes. In reducing scale length, iterative confirmatory principal components analyses stratified by sex revealed a two-item scale (GAD-Mini) with high factor loading items, internal consistency (α ≥ 0.85), and construct validity with PHQ-2 (r ≥ 0.55). Normative data indicate that regardless of whether GAD-7, GAD-2, or GAD-Mini scores were considered, about three-quarters of men and two-thirds of women scored below the reasonable cut-points in screening for GAD. CONCLUSION: Findings from this study may help health care providers and researchers better understand the interpretation of these scales among university students when screening for GAD.
Authors: Kyle T Ganson; Deborah Mitchison; Rachel F Rodgers; Mitchell L Cunningham; Stuart B Murray; Jason M Nagata Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2021-05-22 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Felix S Hussenoeder; Alexander Pabst; Ines Conrad; Margrit Löbner; Christoph Engel; Samira Zeynalova; Nigar Reyes; Heide Glaesmer; Andreas Hinz; Veronica Witte; Matthias L Schroeter; Kerstin Wirkner; Toralf Kirsten; Markus Löffler; Arno Villringer; Steffi G Riedel-Heller Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-14 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: H Blake; S Carlisle; L Fothergill; J Hassard; A Favier; J Corner; J K Ball; C Denning Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 4.135