Literature DB >> 33571276

Application of low-intensity pulsed therapeutic ultrasound on mesenchymal precursors does not affect their cell properties.

Beatriz de Lucas1, Laura M Pérez1, Aurora Bernal2, Beatriz G Gálvez1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound is considered a safe and non-invasive tool in regenerative medicine and has been used in the clinic for more than twenty years for applications in bone healing after the approval of the Exogen device, also known as low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). Beyond its effects on bone health, LIPUS has also been investigated for wound healing of soft tissues, with positive results for various cell processes including cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis. As LIPUS has the potential to treat chronic skin wounds, we sought to evaluate the effects produced by a conventional therapeutic ultrasound device at low intensities (also considered LIPUS) on the migration capacity of mouse and human skin mesenchymal precursors (s-MPs). Cells were stimulated for 3 days (20 minutes per day) using a traditional ultrasound device with the following parameters: 100 mW/cm2 with 20% duty cycle and frequency of 3 MHz. At the parameters used, ultrasound failed to affect s-MP proliferation, with no evident changes in morphology or cell groupings, and no changes at the cytoskeletal level. Further, the migration and invasion ability of s-MPs were unaffected by the ultrasound protocol, and no major changes were detected in the gene/protein expression of ROCK1, integrin β1, laminin β1, type I collagen and transforming growth factor β1. Finally, RNA-seq analysis revealed that only 10 genes were differentially expressed after ultrasound stimulation. Among them, 5 encode for small nuclear RNAs and 2 encode for proteins belonging to the nuclear pore complex. Considering the results overall, while the viability of s-MPs was not affected by ultrasound stimulation and no changes were detected in proliferation/migration, RNA-seq analysis would suggest that s-MPs do respond to ultrasound. The use of 100 mW/cm2 intensity or conventional therapeutic ultrasound devices might not be optimal for the stimulation the properties of cell populations. Future studies should investigate the potential application of ultrasound using variations of the tested parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33571276      PMCID: PMC7877602          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  57 in total

1.  Low intensity-pulsed ultrasound induced apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro.

Authors:  Mingfang Shi; Bangzhong Liu; Guanghua Liu; Ping Wang; Mingzhen Yang; Yun Li; Jian Zhou
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in a rat knee osteoarthritis model: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Volkan Yılmaz; Ömer Karadaş; Taner Dandinoğlu; Ebru Umay; Aytül Çakçı; Arif Kenan Tan
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Angiogenesis effect of therapeutic ultrasound on HUVECs through activation of the PI3K-Akt-eNOS signal pathway.

Authors:  Jing-Juan Huang; Yi-Qin Shi; Rui-Lin Li; An Hu; Zhao-Yang Lu; Liang Weng; Shen-Qi Wang; Yi-Peng Han; Lan Zhang; Bao Li; Chang-Ning Hao; Jun-Li Duan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 4.  Focused Ultrasound and Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Teiichiro Ikeda; Shin Yoshizawa; Norihiro Koizumi; Mamoru Mitsuishi; Yoichiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Increasing the Efficacy of Stem Cell Therapy via Triple-Function Inorganic Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Fang Chen; Eric Ruike Zhao; Ghanim Hableel; Tao Hu; Taeho Kim; Jingting Li; Natalia Isabel Gonzalez-Pech; David J Cheng; Jeanne E Lemaster; Yijun Xie; Vicki H Grassian; George L Sen; Jesse V Jokerst
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Sirio Dupont; Leonardo Morsut; Mariaceleste Aragona; Elena Enzo; Stefano Giulitti; Michelangelo Cordenonsi; Francesca Zanconato; Jimmy Le Digabel; Mattia Forcato; Silvio Bicciato; Nicola Elvassore; Stefano Piccolo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  T K Kristiansen; J P Ryaby; J McCabe; J J Frey; L R Roe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Therapeutic ultrasound reverses peripheral ischemia in type 2 diabetic mice through PI3K-Akt-eNOS pathway.

Authors:  Zhao-Yang Lu; Rui-Lin Li; Hong-Sheng Zhou; Jing-Juan Huang; Zhi-Xiao Su; Jia Qi; Lan Zhang; Yue Li; Yi-Qin Shi; Chang-Ning Hao; Jun-Li Duan
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  Low intensity ultrasound stimulates osteoblast migration at different frequencies.

Authors:  Jennifer Man; Richard M Shelton; Paul R Cooper; Gabriel Landini; Ben A Scheven
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Effect of Low-intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on Postorthognathic Surgery Healing Process.

Authors:  Azita Tehranchi; Mohamadreza Badiee; Farnaz Younessian; Mohamadreza Badiei; Sahar Haddadpour
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.