Sébastien Jungo1, Nathan Moreau1,2, Marco E Mazevet3, Anne-Laure Ejeil1,4, Martin Biosse Duplan1,5, Benjamin Salmon1,4, Violaine Smail-Faugeron1,6. 1. UFR Odontologie, Dental Medicine Department, AP-HP, Bretonneau Hospital, Université de Paris, Paris, France. 2. Laboratory of Orofacial Neurobiology (EA7543), Université de Paris, Paris, France. 3. Dental Innovation and Translation Hub, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, Kings College London, Guy's Hospital, Tower Wing, London, United Kingdom. 4. Laboratory of Orofacial Pathologies, Imaging and Biotherapies UR2496, Université de Paris, Montrouge, France. 5. INSERM U1163, Imagine Institut. 6. Dental Materials Research Unit (URB2I), Université de Paris, Montrouge, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have highlighted the increased risk of contracting the COVID-19 for health-care workers and suggest that oral health-care workers may carry the greatest risk. Considering the transmission route of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, a similar increased risk can be hypothesized for other respiratory infections. However, no study has specifically assessed the risk of contracting COVID-19 within the dental profession. METHODS: An online survey was conducted within a population of French dental professionals between April 1 and April 29, 2020. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore risk indicators associated with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes (i.e. phenotypes present in 15% or more of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases). RESULTS: 4172 dentists and 1868 dental assistants responded to the survey, representing approximately 10% of French oral health-care workers. The prevalence of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was 1.9% for dentists and 0.8% for dental assistants. Higher prevalence was found for COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes both in dentists (15.0%) and dental assistants (11.8%). Chronic kidney disease and obesity were associated with increased odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, whereas working in a practice limited to endodontics was associated with decreased odds. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of public transportation and having a practice limited to periodontology were associated with increased odds of presenting a COVID-19-related clinical phenotype. Moreover, changes in work rhythm or clinical practice were associated with decreased odds of both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although oral health-care professionals were surprisingly not at higher risk of COVID-19 than the general population, specific risk indicators could exist, notably among high aerosol-generating dental subspecialties such as periodontology. Considering the similarities between COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes other viral respiratory infections, lessons can be learned from the COVID-19 pandemic regarding the usefulness of equipping and protecting oral health-care workers, notably during seasonal viral outbreaks, to limit infection spread. IMPACT: Results from this study may provide important insights for relevant health authorities regarding the overall infection status of oral health-care workers in the current pandemic and draw attention to particular at-risk groups, as illustrated in the present study. Protecting oral health-care workers could be an interesting public health strategy to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 and/or the emergence of new pandemics.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have highlighted the increased risk of contracting the COVID-19 for health-care workers and suggest that oral health-care workers may carry the greatest risk. Considering the transmission route of the SARS-CoV-2 infection, a similar increased risk can be hypothesized for other respiratory infections. However, no study has specifically assessed the risk of contracting COVID-19 within the dental profession. METHODS: An online survey was conducted within a population of French dental professionals between April 1 and April 29, 2020. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to explore risk indicators associated with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes (i.e. phenotypes present in 15% or more of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases). RESULTS: 4172 dentists and 1868 dental assistants responded to the survey, representing approximately 10% of French oral health-care workers. The prevalence of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 was 1.9% for dentists and 0.8% for dental assistants. Higher prevalence was found for COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes both in dentists (15.0%) and dental assistants (11.8%). Chronic kidney disease and obesity were associated with increased odds of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, whereas working in a practice limited to endodontics was associated with decreased odds. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, use of public transportation and having a practice limited to periodontology were associated with increased odds of presenting a COVID-19-related clinical phenotype. Moreover, changes in work rhythm or clinical practice were associated with decreased odds of both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although oral health-care professionals were surprisingly not at higher risk of COVID-19 than the general population, specific risk indicators could exist, notably among high aerosol-generating dental subspecialties such as periodontology. Considering the similarities between COVID-19-related clinical phenotypes other viral respiratory infections, lessons can be learned from the COVID-19 pandemic regarding the usefulness of equipping and protecting oral health-care workers, notably during seasonal viral outbreaks, to limit infection spread. IMPACT: Results from this study may provide important insights for relevant health authorities regarding the overall infection status of oral health-care workers in the current pandemic and draw attention to particular at-risk groups, as illustrated in the present study. Protecting oral health-care workers could be an interesting public health strategy to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 and/or the emergence of new pandemics.
Authors: Joana Christina Carvalho; Dominique Declerck; Wolfgang Jacquet; Peter Bottenberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Livia Barenghi; Alberto Barenghi; Umberto Garagiola; Alberto Di Blasio; Aldo Bruno Giannì; Francesco Spadari Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-12-22 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Sreenath Madathil; Walter L Siqueira; Lina M Marin; Farisa Banu Sanaulla; Nancy Faraj; Carlos R Quiñonez; Mary McNally; Michael Glogauer; Paul Allison Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2021-10-25 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Jan Schmidt; Vojtech Perina; Jana Treglerova; Nela Pilbauerova; Jakub Suchanek; Roman Smucler Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Saba Wajeeh; Abhishek Lal; Naseer Ahmed; Md Ibrahim Khalil; Afsheen Maqsood; Akram Mojidea M Alshammari; Abdulelah Zaid Alshammari; Meshari Musallam Mohammed Alsharari; Abdulelah Hamdan Alrushaydan; Abdulaziz Fandi Alruwaili; Mohammad Khursheed Alam Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 3.390