INTRODUCTION: Active pharmacovigilance studies are pivotal to better characterize vaccine safety. METHODS: These are multicenter prospective cohort studies to evaluate the safety of the 2017 and 2018 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs) manufactured by Instituto Butantan, by means of active pharmacovigilance practices. Elderly, children, healthcare workers, pregnant women, and women in the puerperium period were invited to participate in the study during the 2017 and 2018 Brazilian national seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. Following immunization, participants were observed for 30 minutes and they received a participant card to register adverse events information. All safety information registered were checked at a clinical site visit 14 days after immunization and by a telephone contact 42 days after immunization for unsolicited Adverse Events (AE) and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). RESULTS: A total of 942 volunteers participated in the two studies: 305 elderly, 109 children, 108 pregnant women, 32 women in the postpartum period, and 388 health workers. Overall, the median number of AR per participant ranged from 1 to 4. The lowest median number of AR per participant was observed among healthcare workers (1 AR per participant) and the highest among pregnant women (4 AR per participant). Overall, local pain (46.6%) was the most frequent solicited local AR. The most frequent systemic ARs were: headache (22.5%) followed by fatigue (16.0%), and malaise (11.0%). The majority of solicited ARs (96%) were mild, Grades 1 or 2), only 3% were Grade 3, and 1% was Grade 4. No serious AEs, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome, were reported up to 42 days postvaccination. CONCLUSION: The results from the two studies confirmed that the 2017 and 2018 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan were safe and that active pharmacovigilance studies should be considered, when it is feasible, as an important initiative to monitor vaccine safety in the post-marketing period.
INTRODUCTION: Active pharmacovigilance studies are pivotal to better characterize vaccine safety. METHODS: These are multicenter prospective cohort studies to evaluate the safety of the 2017 and 2018 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines (TIVs) manufactured by Instituto Butantan, by means of active pharmacovigilance practices. Elderly, children, healthcare workers, pregnant women, and women in the puerperium period were invited to participate in the study during the 2017 and 2018 Brazilian national seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. Following immunization, participants were observed for 30 minutes and they received a participant card to register adverse events information. All safety information registered were checked at a clinical site visit 14 days after immunization and by a telephone contact 42 days after immunization for unsolicited Adverse Events (AE) and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS). RESULTS: A total of 942 volunteers participated in the two studies: 305 elderly, 109 children, 108 pregnant women, 32 women in the postpartum period, and 388 health workers. Overall, the median number of AR per participant ranged from 1 to 4. The lowest median number of AR per participant was observed among healthcare workers (1 AR per participant) and the highest among pregnant women (4 AR per participant). Overall, local pain (46.6%) was the most frequent solicited local AR. The most frequent systemic ARs were: headache (22.5%) followed by fatigue (16.0%), and malaise (11.0%). The majority of solicited ARs (96%) were mild, Grades 1 or 2), only 3% were Grade 3, and 1% was Grade 4. No serious AEs, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome, were reported up to 42 days postvaccination. CONCLUSION: The results from the two studies confirmed that the 2017 and 2018 seasonal trivalent influenza vaccines produced by Instituto Butantan were safe and that active pharmacovigilance studies should be considered, when it is feasible, as an important initiative to monitor vaccine safety in the post-marketing period.
Authors: Alexis Pillsbury; Patrick Cashman; Alan Leeb; Annette Regan; Darren Westphal; Tom Snelling; Christopher Blyth; Nigel Crawford; Nicholas Wood; Kristine Macartney Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2015
Authors: Flor M Munoz; Lisa A Jackson; Geeta K Swamy; Kathryn M Edwards; Sharon E Frey; Ina Stephens; Kevin Ault; Patricia Winokur; Carey R Petrie; Mark Wolff; Shital M Patel; Wendy A Keitel Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: A Danielle Iuliano; Katherine M Roguski; Howard H Chang; David J Muscatello; Rakhee Palekar; Stefano Tempia; Cheryl Cohen; Jon Michael Gran; Dena Schanzer; Benjamin J Cowling; Peng Wu; Jan Kyncl; Li Wei Ang; Minah Park; Monika Redlberger-Fritz; Hongjie Yu; Laura Espenhain; Anand Krishnan; Gideon Emukule; Liselotte van Asten; Susana Pereira da Silva; Suchunya Aungkulanon; Udo Buchholz; Marc-Alain Widdowson; Joseph S Bresee Journal: Lancet Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Vera Lúcia Gattás; Patrícia Emília Braga; Marcelo Eiji Koike; Maria Beatriz Bastos Lucchesi; Mayra Martho Moura de Oliveira; Roberta de Oliveira Piorelli; Vivian Queiroz; Alexander Roberto Precioso Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 1.846
Authors: Joseph S Bresee; Kathryn E Lafond; Margaret McCarron; Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner; Susan Y Chu; Malembe Ebama; Alan R Hinman; Anonh Xeuatvongsa; Silvia Bino; Dominique Richardson; Rachael M Porter; Ann Moen; Mark McKinlay Journal: Vaccine Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 3.641