INTRODUCTION: Renal thrombotic microangiopathy (rTMA) is one of many vascular findings in Lupus Nephritis (LN). However, the influence of rTMA on prognosis has not been well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and pathological aspects of patients with lupus and rTMA in kidney biopsy. METHODS: Analysis of medical reports and kidney biopsy of 253 patients with LN, between January 2012 and December 2018. RESULTS: Among our 253 patients, 43 (17%) showed acute or chronic TMA lesions on kidney histology This group had a significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of biopsy (24.1 vs. 64.15 ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001), at 1 year of follow up (28.1 vs. 90.7 ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001), and at the end of follow up (25.4 vs. 81.55 ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001). More patients in the rTMA group reached the composite endpoint of eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73m2 or death or dialysis (82.9% vs. 32.9%, p < 0.001). When comparing the classical clinical TMA features, the rTMA group had higher percentages of anemia, thrombocytopenia, low haptoglobin levels, but not higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (> 214 U/L). Combining these variables in a definition of clinical TMA, the rTMA group had a statistically higher percentage of clinical TMA (20.9% vs. 4.33%, p = 0.001). As expected, TMA group showed higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (130 vs 129.5 mmHg, p = 0.01). Concerning histopathological features, rTMA group had significantly higher activity (9.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.001) and chronicity (4.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.001) scores, also a higher percentage of patients presented with crescents (76.7% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The classical clinical TMA criteria were unable to predict the presence of tissue TMA, suggesting a probably renal-limited TMA that may occur independently of systemic evident factors. Therefore, renal biopsy remains the critical method for diagnosing an important prognostic feature.
INTRODUCTION:Renal thrombotic microangiopathy (rTMA) is one of many vascular findings in Lupus Nephritis (LN). However, the influence of rTMA on prognosis has not been well established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and pathological aspects of patients with lupus and rTMA in kidney biopsy. METHODS: Analysis of medical reports and kidney biopsy of 253 patients with LN, between January 2012 and December 2018. RESULTS: Among our 253 patients, 43 (17%) showed acute or chronic TMA lesions on kidney histology This group had a significantly lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of biopsy (24.1 vs. 64.15 ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001), at 1 year of follow up (28.1 vs. 90.7 ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001), and at the end of follow up (25.4 vs. 81.55 ml/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001). More patients in the rTMA group reached the composite endpoint of eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73m2 or death or dialysis (82.9% vs. 32.9%, p < 0.001). When comparing the classical clinical TMA features, the rTMA group had higher percentages of anemia, thrombocytopenia, low haptoglobin levels, but not higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (> 214 U/L). Combining these variables in a definition of clinical TMA, the rTMA group had a statistically higher percentage of clinical TMA (20.9% vs. 4.33%, p = 0.001). As expected, TMA group showed higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) (130 vs 129.5 mmHg, p = 0.01). Concerning histopathological features, rTMA group had significantly higher activity (9.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.001) and chronicity (4.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.001) scores, also a higher percentage of patients presented with crescents (76.7% vs. 57.1%, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The classical clinical TMA criteria were unable to predict the presence of tissue TMA, suggesting a probably renal-limited TMA that may occur independently of systemic evident factors. Therefore, renal biopsy remains the critical method for diagnosing an important prognostic feature.
Authors: H M Bastian; J M Roseman; G McGwin; G S Alarcón; A W Friedman; B J Fessler; B A Baethge; J D Reveille Journal: Lupus Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: M Scully; S Cataland; P Coppo; J de la Rubia; K D Friedman; J Kremer Hovinga; B Lämmle; M Matsumoto; K Pavenski; E Sadler; R Sarode; H Wu Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Danielle Cohen; Marije Koopmans; Idske C L Kremer Hovinga; Stefan P Berger; Marian Roos van Groningen; Gerda M Steup-Beekman; Emile de Heer; Jan Anthonie Bruijn; Ingeborg M Bajema Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-08
Authors: Ana Barrera-Vargas; Rodrigo Rosado-Canto; Javier Merayo-Chalico; José M Arreola-Guerra; Juan M Mejía-Vilet; Ricardo Correa-Rotter; Diana Gómez-Martín; Jorge Alcocer-Varela Journal: J Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.517
Authors: Ingeborg M Bajema; Suzanne Wilhelmus; Charles E Alpers; Jan A Bruijn; Robert B Colvin; H Terence Cook; Vivette D D'Agati; Franco Ferrario; Mark Haas; J Charles Jennette; Kensuke Joh; Cynthia C Nast; Laure-Hélène Noël; Emilie C Rijnink; Ian S D Roberts; Surya V Seshan; Sanjeev Sethi; Agnes B Fogo Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2018-02-16 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: David Massicotte-Azarniouch; Elizabeth Kotzen; Sarah Todd; Yichun Hu; Susan L Hogan; Koyal Jain Journal: Lupus Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 2.858