Literature DB >> 33570589

Breaking pandemic chain reactions: telehealth psychosocial support in cardiovascular disease during COVID-19.

Geraldine Martorella1, Suzanne Fredericks2, Julie Sanders3, Rochelle Wynne4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33570589      PMCID: PMC7799113          DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvaa011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs        ISSN: 1474-5151            Impact factor:   3.908


× No keyword cloud information.
This editorial refers to ‘Delivering healthcare remotely to cardiovascular patients during COVID-19: A rapid review of the evidence’, by L. Neubeck Can  one pandemic intensify the existence of another? The outlook for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) during COVID-19 is grim. Evidence indicates a relationship exists between COVID-19 and the onset or exacerbation of heart disease; two conditions are categorized as pandemics by the World Health Organization. Pre-diagnosed CVD increases the risk of death from COVID-19 by almost 70% following acute myocardial injury and patient behaviours are compounding this risk. Initially, patients were not presenting to the hospital, and activity in cardiology units decreased anywhere from 50% to 80%. ‘Time is heart’ and time from symptom onset to first medical contact has in some instances quadrupled since late January 2020. In the context of healthcare systems being pushed to their limits in countries with adequate infrastructure and unimaginable outcomes in countries without it, our response to the array of existing and rebound cardiovascular conditions is crucial. As a global society, how do we begin to address or even consider preventing pandemic chain reactions? COVID-19 is characterized by the rapid transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Symptoms that present at onset include fever, cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, and loss of taste. Long-term outcomes associated with this disease are unclear; however, evidence suggests an increased likelihood for COVID-19 positive patients to experience heart disease; as the trajectory of illness has been shown to significantly affect heart function resulting in myocardial injury (MI). Psychological symptoms related to anxiety, stress, depression, social isolation, and poor sleep quality confound COVID-19 positive patients’ overall risk of heart disease. This is of importance as cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death and disability, worldwide. Thus, the impact of COVID-19 on exacerbating rates of CVD can have potentially devasting international health and economic consequences. Identifying and implementing strategies to reduce the onset of heart disease in patients who have tested positive for the virus or are presenting with psychological symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic is urgently needed to reduce rates of MI or onset of heart disease. The following presents an overview of specific strategies that can be used to mitigate the psychological impact of COVID-19, as well as its long-term effects on the development of CVD. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided an opportunity to reflect on telehealth practice and increase its use judiciously when monitoring needs to be maintained. Most importantly, this crisis has enabled telehealth to become invaluable as it can address isolation, maintain a feeling of social belonging, and decrease anxiety and depression. Telehealth provides a mechanism to support mental health and well-being in association with physical health management. Several cognitive and relaxation strategies can be used through telehealth and self-help alternatives that are convenient and cost-effective. For instance, music interventions have been shown to have beneficial effects on the anxiety of persons with CVD as well as on blood pressure, heart, and respiratory rates and sleep, and can be used with or without the presence of a music therapist. Preliminary evidence indicates similar findings in relation to music therapy when delivered to patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Recently, mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) have provided additional advantages for patients with CVD with demonstrated effectiveness for improving depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life. Superior benefits have been gained with MBI when contrasted to health education, relaxation training, and supportive psychotherapy; effects are comparable with traditional cognitive behaviour therapy that is demanding and less suitable for self-help formats. MBI have also shown emerging evidence for the reduction of inflammatory immune markers in adult populations, which are known predictors of CVD. It is then not surprising that the American Heart Association (AHA) has released a scientific statement in favour of meditation for cardiovascular risk reduction. Since this release, strengthening beneficial evidence continues to emerge in support of MBI for improved psychological and physiological CVD risk factors and outcomes. Importantly, given the context of chronicity related to CVD and the isolation experienced during a pandemic, dyadic psychosocial telehealth interventions provide a contemporary immediate avenue to support patients and their caregivers. A brief dyadic MBI has recently shown improvement in health-related quality of life and psychological distress in atrial fibrillation patients. Delivery of MBI using telehealth has the capacity to markedly reduce risk in an already vulnerable population. Timely psychosocial interventions require immediate implementation to stem the tide of avoidable COVID-19 consequences. There is Level 1 evidence to support the use of telehealth for patients with CVD. Whether the usual barriers to access for patients with CVD such as socioeconomic status, geographical isolation, cultural or linguist diversity, frailty, or chronic comorbid conditions create barriers for patients to access healthcare, or a pandemic such as COVID-19, widespread, sustained implementation of telehealth with MBI provides an opportunity to effectively reduce or mitigate psychological impacts of physiological cardiovascular function. Conflict of interest: none declared.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Structured telephone support or non-invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Sally C Inglis; Robyn A Clark; Riet Dierckx; David Prieto-Merino; John G F Cleland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-31

2.  Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on health-related outcomes for patients with heart failure: a systematic review.

Authors:  Huijing Zou; Xi Cao; Jing Geng; Sek Ying Chair
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.908

3.  Rapid deployment of virtual mind-body interventions during the COVID-19 outbreak: feasibility, acceptability, and implications for future care.

Authors:  Kelly M Trevino; Nirupa Raghunathan; Shelly Latte-Naor; Fernanda C G Polubriaginof; Claus Jensen; Thomas M Atkinson; Nicholas Emard; Christina M Seluzicki; Jamie S Ostroff; Jun J Mao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Dyadic Psychosocial eHealth Interventions: Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kelly M Shaffer; Ashley Tigershtrom; Hoda Badr; Stephanie Benvengo; Marisol Hernandez; Lee M Ritterband
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Flexibility and safety in times of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Implications for nurses and allied professionals in cardiology.

Authors:  Tiny Jaarsma; Martje van der Wal; Lynne Hinterbuchner; Stefan Köberich; Irene Lie; Anna Strömberg
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 6.  Delivering healthcare remotely to cardiovascular patients during COVID-19 : A rapid review of the evidence.

Authors:  Lis Neubeck; Tina Hansen; Tiny Jaarsma; Leonie Klompstra; Robyn Gallagher
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 7.  Meditation and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Glenn N Levine; Richard A Lange; C Noel Bairey-Merz; Richard J Davidson; Kenneth Jamerson; Puja K Mehta; Erin D Michos; Keith Norris; Indranill Basu Ray; Karen L Saban; Tina Shah; Richard Stein; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Authors:  Tao Guo; Yongzhen Fan; Ming Chen; Xiaoyan Wu; Lin Zhang; Tao He; Hairong Wang; Jing Wan; Xinghuan Wang; Zhibing Lu
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

9.  Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak on ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care in Hong Kong, China.

Authors:  Chor-Cheung Frankie Tam; Kent-Shek Cheung; Simon Lam; Anthony Wong; Arthur Yung; Michael Sze; Yui-Ming Lam; Carmen Chan; Tat-Chi Tsang; Matthew Tsui; Hung-Fat Tse; Chung-Wah Siu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-03-17
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effect of an mHealth self-help intervention on readmission after adult cardiac surgery: Protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rochelle Wynne; Joanne Nolte; Stacey Matthews; Jennifer Angel; Ann Le; Andrew Moore; Tina Campbell; Caleb Ferguson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.057

2.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients Affected by Non-Communicable Diseases in Europe and in the USA.

Authors:  Catherine Pécout; Emilie Pain; Michael Chekroun; Claire Champeix; Claudie Kulak; Rita Prieto; Joris van Vugt; Kim Gilchrist; Anne-Félice Lainé-Pellet
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.