Literature DB >> 33570576

Comparison of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Screening Using Reverse Transcriptase-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction or CRISPR-Based Assays in Asymptomatic College Students.

Jennifer N Rauch1,2, Eric Valois1, Jose Carlos Ponce-Rojas1, Zach Aralis1, Ryan S Lach1, Francesca Zappa1, Morgane Audouard1,2, Sabrina C Solley1, Chinmay Vaidya1, Michael Costello1, Holly Smith3, Ali Javanbakht3, Betsy Malear3, Laura Polito3, Stewart Comer4,5, Katherine Arn6, Kenneth S Kosik1,2, Diego Acosta-Alvear1,2, Maxwell Z Wilson1,2,7, Lynn Fitzgibbons6, Carolina Arias1,2,8.   

Abstract

Importance: The reopening of colleges and universities in the US during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a significant public health challenge. The development of accessible and practical approaches for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection in the college population is paramount for deploying recurrent surveillance testing as an essential strategy for virus detection, containment, and mitigation. Objective: To determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic participants in a university community by using CREST (Cas13-based, rugged, equitable, scalable testing), a CRISPR-based test developed for accessible and large-scale viral screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this cohort study, a total of 1808 asymptomatic participants were screened for SARS-CoV-2 using a CRISPR-based assay and a point-of-reference reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) test. Viral prevalence in self-collected oropharyngeal swab samples collected from May 28 to June 11, 2020, and from June 23 to July 2, 2020, was evaluated. Exposures: Testing for SARS-CoV-2. Main Outcomes and Measures: SARS-CoV-2 status, viral load, and demographic information of the study participants were collected.
Results: Among the 1808 participants (mean [SD] age, 27.3 [11.0] years; 955 [52.8%] female), 732 underwent testing from May to early June (mean [SD] age, 28.4 [11.7] years; 392 [53.6%] female). All test results in this cohort were negative. In contrast, 1076 participants underwent testing from late June to early July (mean [SD] age, 26.6 [10.5] years; 563 [52.3%] female), with 9 positive results by RT-qPCR. Eight of these positive samples were detected by the CRISPR-based assay and confirmed by Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified diagnostic testing. The mean (SD) age of the positive cases was 21.7 (3.3) years; all 8 individuals self-identified as students. These metrics showed that a CRISPR-based assay was effective at capturing positive SARS-CoV-2 cases in this student population. Notably, the viral loads detected in these asymptomatic cases resemble those seen in clinical samples, highlighting the potential of covert viral transmission. The shift in viral prevalence coincided with the relaxation of stay-at-home measures. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings reveal a shift in SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in a young and asymptomatic population and uncover the leading edge of a local outbreak that coincided with rising case counts in the surrounding county and the state of California. The concordance between CRISPR-based and RT-qPCR testing suggests that CRISPR-based assays are reliable and offer alternative options for surveillance testing and detection of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks, as is required to resume operations in higher-education institutions in the US and abroad.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33570576     DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  8 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and antigen tests, and sample types for diagnosis of COVID-19: a review.

Authors:  Yujia Zhang; Rachael Garner; Sana Salehi; Marianna La Rocca; Dominique Duncan
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Diagnostics of COVID-19 Based on CRISPR-Cas Coupled to Isothermal Amplification: A Comparative Analysis and Update.

Authors:  Armando Hernandez-Garcia; Melissa D Morales-Moreno; Erick G Valdés-Galindo; Eric P Jimenez-Nieto; Andrea Quezada
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-10

Review 3.  Insights into Cardiovascular Defects and Cardiac Epigenome in the Context of COVID-19.

Authors:  Shreya Sarkar; Rwik Sen
Journal:  Epigenomes       Date:  2022-04-21

4.  Occurrence and transmission potential of asymptomatic and presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections: Update of a living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diana Buitrago-Garcia; Aziz Mert Ipekci; Leonie Heron; Hira Imeri; Lucia Araujo-Chaveron; Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Agustín Ciapponi; Muge Cevik; Anthony Hauser; Muhammad Irfanul Alam; Kaspar Meili; Eric A Meyerowitz; Nirmala Prajapati; Xueting Qiu; Aaron Richterman; William Gildardo Robles-Rodriguez; Shabnam Thapa; Ivan Zhelyazkov; Georgia Salanti; Nicola Low
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 11.613

Review 5.  The relationship between COVID-19 viral load and disease severity: A systematic review.

Authors:  Omid Dadras; Amir M Afsahi; Zahra Pashaei; Hengameh Mojdeganlou; Amirali Karimi; Pedram Habibi; Alireza Barzegary; Amirata Fakhfouri; Pegah Mirzapour; Nazanin Janfaza; Soheil Dehghani; Fatemeh Afroughi; Mohsen Dashti; Sepideh Khodaei; Esmaeil Mehraeen; Fabricio Voltarelli; Jean-Marc Sabatier; SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2021-12-13

6.  Accuracy of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) to diagnose COVID-19, a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Song Wang; Jiayi Hu; Chuanying Sui; Guangliang He; Zihan Qu; Xiaofei Chen; Yashan Wang; Dingjie Guo; Xin Liu
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.848

Review 7.  Development of gold nanoparticle-based biosensors for COVID-19 diagnosis.

Authors:  Johra Khan; Yousef Rasmi; Kevser Kübra Kırboğa; Ahmad Ali; Mithun Rudrapal; Rohan R Patekar
Journal:  Beni Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci       Date:  2022-09-05

8.  Sample-Pooling Strategy for SARS-CoV-2 Detection among Students and Staff of the University of Sannio.

Authors:  Immacolata Polvere; Elena Silvestri; Lina Sabatino; Antonia Giacco; Stefania Iervolino; Teresa Peluso; Rosa Guida; Lucrezia Zerillo; Romualdo Varricchio; Silvia D'Andrea; Serena Voccola; Jessica Raffaella Madera; Alberto Zullo; Romania Stilo; Pasquale Vito; Tiziana Zotti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-26
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.