PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of training on scanning accuracy of complete arch scans (CAS) performed by first-time users, with a distinction made between specific training (repeated performance of CAS) and nonspecific training (simple use of an intraoral optical scanner for a sextant scan in the context of a CAD/CAM teaching module). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 students with no experience in intraoral scanning were randomized into three groups (n = 12 per group) according to the number of CAS sessions: three sessions (3S), two sessions (2S), and one session (1S). Each student had to perform 10 CAS per scanning session. Sessions were scheduled at T0, T1, and T2 for group 3S; at T0 and T2 for group 2S; and at T2 for group 1S. Before the final scanning session in each group (ie, the first scanning session in group 1S), the students completed a CAD/CAM teaching module, which included fabrication of a monolithic crown in a fully digital chairside workflow. RESULTS: In all groups, repeated CAS resulted in improved scanning accuracy. Participation in the CAD/CAM module had a positive effect on initial accuracy for CAS. Mean absolute deviations in cross-arch distance were 84 μm (T0), 68 μm (T1), and 63 μm (T2) for group 3S; 79 μm (T0) and 61 μm (T2) for group 2S; and 67 μm (T2) for group 1S. CONCLUSION: To perform CAS with the best possible accuracy, specific training is highly recommended. In addition, nonspecific training leads to an improvement in initial scanning accuracy.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of training on scanning accuracy of complete arch scans (CAS) performed by first-time users, with a distinction made between specific training (repeated performance of CAS) and nonspecific training (simple use of an intraoral optical scanner for a sextant scan in the context of a CAD/CAM teaching module). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 students with no experience in intraoral scanning were randomized into three groups (n = 12 per group) according to the number of CAS sessions: three sessions (3S), two sessions (2S), and one session (1S). Each student had to perform 10 CAS per scanning session. Sessions were scheduled at T0, T1, and T2 for group 3S; at T0 and T2 for group 2S; and at T2 for group 1S. Before the final scanning session in each group (ie, the first scanning session in group 1S), the students completed a CAD/CAM teaching module, which included fabrication of a monolithic crown in a fully digital chairside workflow. RESULTS: In all groups, repeated CAS resulted in improved scanning accuracy. Participation in the CAD/CAM module had a positive effect on initial accuracy for CAS. Mean absolute deviations in cross-arch distance were 84 μm (T0), 68 μm (T1), and 63 μm (T2) for group 3S; 79 μm (T0) and 61 μm (T2) for group 2S; and 67 μm (T2) for group 1S. CONCLUSION: To perform CAS with the best possible accuracy, specific training is highly recommended. In addition, nonspecific training leads to an improvement in initial scanning accuracy.