ConspectusThe rediscovery of the halide perovskite class of compounds and, in particular, the organic and inorganic lead halide perovskite (LHP) materials and lead-free derivatives has reached remarkable landmarks in numerous applications. First among these is the field of photovoltaics, which is at the core of today's environmental sustainability efforts. Indeed, these efforts have born fruit, reaching to date a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.2% for a double-cation Cs, FA lead halide thin film device. Other applications include light and particle detectors as well as lighting. However, chemical and thermal degradation issues prevent perovskite-based devices and particularly photovoltaic modules from reaching the market. The soft ionic nature of LHPs makes these materials susceptible to delicate changes in the chemical environment. Therefore, control over their interface properties plays a critical role in maintaining their stability. Here we focus on LHP nanocrystals, where surface termination by ligands determines not only the stability of the material but also the crystallographic phase and crystal habit. A surface analysis of nanocrystal interfaces revealed the involvement of Brønsted type acid-base equilibrium in the modification of the ligand moieties present, which in turn can invoke dissolution and recrystallization into the more favorable phase in terms of minimization of the surface energy. A large library of surface ligands has already been developed showing both good chemical stability and good electronic surface passivation, resulting in near-unity emission quantum yields for some materials, particularly CsPbBr3. However, most of those ligands have a large organic tail hampering charge carrier transport and extraction in nanocrystal-based solid films.The unique perovskite structure that allows ligand substitution in the surface A (cation) sites and the soft ionic nature is expected to allow the accommodation of large dipoles across the perovskite crystal. This was shown to facilitate electron transfer across a molecular linked single-particle junction, creating a large built-in field across the junction nanodomains. This strategy could be useful for implementing LHP NCs in a p-n junction photovoltaic configuration as well as for a variety of electronic devices. A better understanding of the surface propeties of LHP nanocrystals will also enable better control of their growth on surfaces and in confined volumes, such as those afforded by metal-organic frameworks, zeolites, or chemically patterened surfaces such as anodic alumina, which have already been shown to significantly alter the properties of in-situ-grown LHP materials.
ConspectusThe rediscovery of the n>an class="Chemical">halideperovskite class of compounds and, in particular, the organic and inorganic lead halide perovskite (LHP) materials and lead-free derivatives has reached remarkable landmarks in numerous applications. First among these is the field of photovoltaics, which is at the core of today's environmental sustainability efforts. Indeed, these efforts have born fruit, reaching to date a remarkable power conversion efficiency of 25.2% for a double-cation Cs, FA lead halide thin film device. Other applications include light and particle detectors as well as lighting. However, chemical and thermal degradation issues prevent perovskite-based devices and particularly photovoltaic modules from reaching the market. The soft ionic nature of LHPs makes these materials susceptible to delicate changes in the chemical environment. Therefore, control over their interface properties plays a critical role in maintaining their stability. Here we focus on LHP nanocrystals, where surface termination by ligands determines not only the stability of the material but also the crystallographic phase and crystal habit. A surface analysis of nanocrystal interfaces revealed the involvement of Brønsted type acid-base equilibrium in the modification of the ligand moieties present, which in turn can invoke dissolution and recrystallization into the more favorable phase in terms of minimization of the surface energy. A large library of surface ligands has already been developed showing both good chemical stability and good electronic surface passivation, resulting in near-unity emission quantum yields for some materials, particularly CsPbBr3. However, most of those ligands have a large organic tail hampering charge carrier transport and extraction in nanocrystal-based solid films.The unique perovskite structure that allows ligand substitution in the surface A (cation) sites and the soft ionic nature is expected to allow the accommodation of large dipoles across the perovskite crystal. This was shown to facilitate electron transfer across a molecular linked single-particle junction, creating a large built-in field across the junction nanodomains. This strategy could be useful for implementing LHP NCsin a p-n junction photovoltaic configuration as well as for a variety of electronic devices. A better understanding of the surface propeties of LHP nanocrystals will also enable better control of their growth on surfaces and in confined volumes, such as those afforded by metal-organic frameworks, zeolites, or chemically patterened surfaces such as anodic alumina, which have already been shown to significantly alter the properties of in-situ-grown LHP materials.
.[1]Pointing to the
common attributes of previously reported lead halide NC syntheses.
Shows that the synthesis mechanism goes through two stages: seed mediated
nucleation and growth by self-assembly..[2]Shows the eminent role of the
nature of surface ln>an class="Chemical">igands in perovskite NC phase transformations and
clarifies the structural mechanism of crystallographic phase change
from 0D CsPbXto 3D CsPbXperovskite.
.[3]First example and charactern>an class="Chemical">ization of
a p–n-like junction of a perovskite-CdSe NCs hybrid.
Introduction
Lead-haliden>an class="Chemical">perovskite (LHP) film-based optoelectronic applications
such as solar cells, radiation detectors, and LEDs have reached impressive
performance in the past decade. Still, there are significant technological
challenges in the production of thin-film-based devices, encouraging
the development of advanced protocols for colloidal perovskite NC
synthesis. In turn, knowledge gathered from colloidal NC research,
down to the atomic scale, is being implemented in improved methods
for thin-film-based devices.[4] A key component
of colloidal nanocrystalline materials is the surface ligands. Surface
ligands, in particular, in smaller NCs, owing to the large surface-to-volume
ratio, have great importance in many aspects that are of utmost importance
to the control and optimization of optoelectronic device design and
performance. During synthesis, surface ligands serve as a major control
knob in determining the size, shape, and crystalline habit of the
NCs. Surface ligands have a dramatic effect on optical properties
such as the PL QY, Stokes shift, and chirality. To a significant extent,
they also govern the characteristics of interfaces between LHPs and
other materials, enabling the control of charge carrier transport
properties and even electronic band alignment via control of the molecular
dipoles.[5−7]
In n>an class="Chemical">LHPs, the surface/bulk interface is much
more subtle than in
typical covalent semiconductor NCs owing to their soft ionic bonding
nature and unique cagelike structure that favor surface substitution
and reconstruction over adsorption.[8] The
3D crystal structure of perovskite, described by the chemical formula
ABX3, is constructed from corner-sharing lead halide [BX6]4– octahedra with an organic or inorganic
A-site cation (e.g., MA+, FA+, Cs+) occupying the central void between the octahedra. At the surface,
where the atomic periodicity is interrupted, the crystal surface can
terminate with either metalhalide units or A-site cations. Because
LHPs possess particularly weak ionic bonding character, their surface
terminations are highly dependent on their synthesis and/or processing
history. Moreover, the soft ionic nature of LHPs renders them liable
to crystal distortions where surface effects can extend well into
the bulk of the crystal.[9−11]
When A sites are occupn>an class="Chemical">ied
by groups that are too large, such as
the long-chain alkyl aminmmonium cations, LHPs turn into the 2D layered
structure (i.e., Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites)[12] to form quantum well superlattices, thus providing
an additional degree of freedom to tune the intrinsic physical features,
including the optical band gap, exciton binding energy, and dielectric
constant.[13,14]
In thn>an class="Chemical">is Account, we highlight the
role of molecular surface ligands
in colloidal LHP nanocrystals, beginning with a discussion of their
role in synthesis and crystal phase control, followed by their effect
on the electronic properties at heterojunctions between LHPs and other
semiconductors through the example of a CsPbBr3–CdSe
hybrid structure.
Role of Molecular Surface
Ligands in Colloidal
Perovskite NC Synthesis
Two main routes for the synthesn>an class="Chemical">is
of LHP NCs have been demonstrated
to date: ligand-assisted reprecipitation and the hot-injection method.
In ligand-assisted reprecipitation, the inorganic salt precursors
and organic amine and carboxylic acid ligands are dissolved in a polar
solvent such as DMF acting as a good solvent, while a nonpolar solvent
such as toluene acts as a poor solvent to promote the reprecipitation
process. In this case, shape control was demonstrated depending on
the aliphatic chain length of the ligands used.[15] A second route, pioneered by Schmidt et al.,[16] applied the hot-injection method strategy typically
used for semiconductor and metal QDs for the growth of hybrid organic–inorganic
MAPbBr3 NCs.[16] The synthesis
involved the reaction of a metal saltin the presence of oleic acid
(OA) in octadecene (ODE) with the injection of the ammonium cation
at a moderate temperature of 80 °C. This synthesis method relied
on the addition of a longer ammonium cation that cannot be incorporated
into the perovskite crystal structure, thus arresting the crystal
growth, leading to NC formation.
Both synthesis methodologn>an class="Chemical">ies
pointed to the importance of acid–base
reactions controlling the formation of ammonium ionsin the reaction
mixture. For example, thickness control of MAPbBr3 nanoplatelets
(NPLs) was achieved by tuning the acidity of the reaction mixture.[17,18] The effect of pH was explained by the formation of ammonium through
an amine protonation by an acid, resulting in preferential binding,
where the ammonium competes with Cs+ions on the surface
of the growing platelets and selectively slows the growth along the
vertical direction, promoting anisotropic growth.[19−21] Further work
revealed the dependence of LHP NC morphologies on the acidic and basic
hydrocarbons, such as amines and carboxylic acids, and their ratios
and chain lengths.[22−24] The use of shorter-chain amines leads to thinner
NPLs, the use of shorter-chain carboxylic acids leads to larger NCs,[23] and the use of only OA produces orthorhombic
nanocubes with no shape control.[25] There
is a prominent effect on the end product and surface chemistry of
LHP synthesis under specific synthesis conditions such as temperature,
solvent polarity, and ligand-to-metal molar ratios which in turn can
affect different equilibrium pathways such as PbX2 dissociation,
metal–ligand complexation, and, of course, acid–base
reactions.[21] In fact, a careful investigation
of all reported LHP NP syntheses to date seems to show that all reactions
actually follow the same general main attributes. First, the involvement
of ammonium species in surface passivation was shown by De Roo et
al.[26] Second, the ammonium species can
be formed by amine protonation that can be realized either by direct
reaction with an organic acid at high temperatures or by the addition
of polar solvents, even at room temperature. Third, there is preferential
binding of ammonium over the carboxylate ligand to the perovskite
surface, replacing the A-site cation and thus affecting the growth
kinetics and the obtained size and shape.
Effect
of Polar Molecular Agents in the Perovskite
Nucleation Reaction
The synthesis of collon>an class="Chemical">idal LHP NCs, pioneered
by Protesescu et al., uses PbBr2 complexed by OA and OLAmin a noncoordinating ODE medium and CsOA solution injected at an elevated
temperature followed by fast cooling.[27] Interestingly, different end products can be obtained even without
any apparent change in the composition of the reactants. As it turns
out (and quite out of the ordinary situation in “typical”
colloidal semiconductor nanocrystal synthesis, such as in the case
of CdSe), the reaction is so sensitive that even a variation of the
reaction time of the PbI2 precursor with OA and OLAm prior
to the addition of CsOA precursor can significantly affect the end
product. We tried to elucidate the origin of this phenomenon by relating
it either to the different nucleation kinetics or to a chemical reaction
of the ligands.[1] First, we have found that
Pb0 NPs are formed during the aging time, the remnants
of which are still embedded in the end product. This suggests that
Pb0 NPs serve as seeds for LHP NP nucleation. Second, while
cube-shaped CsPbI3 NCs were obtained after 1 h of aging
time, micrometer-sized NWs were obtained after 16 h of aging time,
along with a mixture of both in between (Figure ). The major factor controlling the end product
was neither the seed size nor the concentration but rather the polar
molecular species forming during the aging process. This conclusion
was further supported by the single-step formation of NPLs and nanowires
upon injection of small amounts of polar additives into the reaction
flask. An extension to this idea was recently reported by Chakrabarty
et al., where cesium cholatein a small volume of methanol was used
as the Cs precursor to synthesize differently shaped LHPs by controlling
the polarity of the reaction mixture.[28] Further support for this mechanism is provided by the work of Grisorio
et al., where two-dimensional [(RNH3)2(PbBr4)] structures were shown to form
during synthesis prior to the addition of the Cs precursor.[29] De Roo et al. showed that CsPbBr3 NCs can be terminated either by oleylammonium bromide or oleylammoniumcarboxylate that can bind either to the metal or to the cation, and
both are necessary to stabilize the CsPbX3 NCsin solution.[26] Furthermore, there is a dynamic stabilization
of oleylammonium bromidein solution, and the binding strength indeed
relies on controlled acid–base equilibrium afforded by the
presence of OA.[30]
Figure 1
Effect of seed aging
time (i.e., step 1) on the morphology of intermediate
CsPbI3 (i.e., step 2). As the aging time is increased,
the reaction product of stage 1 change from cubes for 1 h of aging
time to mixed cubes and thin wires for 7 h of aging and long wires
and tubes for 16 h of aging time.
Effect of seed aging
tn>an class="Chemical">ime (i.e., step 1) on the morphology of intermediate
CsPbI3 (i.e., step 2). As the aging time is increased,
the reaction product of stage 1 change from cubes for 1 h of aging
time to mixed cubes and thin wires for 7 h of aging and long wires
and tubes for 16 h of aging time.
Growth by Oriented Attachment Mediated by
Molecular Polar Agents
Growth by oriented attachment n>an class="Chemical">into
larger self-assembled structures can proceed either by the intentional
destabilization of surface ligand passivation or by spontaneous gradual
aggregation.[18,22,31]Figure shows the
oriented attachment of CsPbX3 NCs observed in the reaction
mixture left to anneal over some time. Postsynthesis treatments which
affect the surface composition of the NPs showed similar results.
Bekenstein et al.[22] showed that postsynthesis
addition of alkenehalides to the reaction mixture at an elevated temperature
of 110 °C produces only 2D thin sheets. In this case, the alkenehalide
serves as a polar destabilizer, likely through complexation with OLAm.
Pan et al. showed that purification with acetone removes the ammonium
ligands but retains the carboxylates.[23] These observations suggest that sufficient removal of the ammonium
ligand plays a major role in the oriented attachment growth modeinto
2D structures, while oleate ligands are retained on the surface. Growth
into 3D structures is, in turn, promoted by the removal of both ammonium
and oleate ligands.
Figure 2
TEM image of the initial Pb0 NPs (a) serving
as nucleation
seeds for the synthesis of 5 nm CsPbBr3 NPLs (b). (c) Self-assembly
of NPLs in the reaction mixture into larger cubes in the case of CsPbBr3 and wires for CsPbI3 (d). (e) Schematic representation
of the conversion of nanocubes to bulk-type crystals through orientated
attachment self-assembly.
TEM image of the n>an class="Chemical">initial Pb0 NPs (a) serving
as nucleation
seeds for the synthesis of 5 nm CsPbBr3 NPLs (b). (c) Self-assembly
of NPLs in the reaction mixture into larger cubes in the case of CsPbBr3 and wires for CsPbI3 (d). (e) Schematic representation
of the conversion of nanocubes to bulk-type crystals through orientated
attachment self-assembly.
Phase Transformations
The phase diagram of
n>an class="Chemical">cesium leadhalides enables the stable growth
of materials with several ratios of CsX and PbX2 (where
X is a halide).[32] A 1:1 ratio yields the
most commonly studied form, CsPbX3, featuring a three-dimensional
(3D) network of corner-shared lead halideoctahedra. A 1:2 ratio yields
CsPb2X5, a two-dimensional (2D) layered perovskite
derivate obtained from the three-dimensional (3D) analogue by slicing
along crystallographic planes and the insertion of PbX2 planes. Finally, a 4:1 ratio yields Cs4PbX6, a quasi-zero-dimensional (0D) perovskite derivate with a recurring
motif of isolated lead halideoctahedra. Cs4PbX6, exhibiting highly localized optical excitations and a band gap
in the near-ultraviolet (near-UV) region, is often also a recurrent
byproduct of CsPbX3 syntheses.[33−35] Intriguingly,
a reversible transformation from CsPbX3 to Cs4PbX6 NCs can be induced by various methods. These include
the addition of lead salts[36] and the addition
of thiols serving as a strong complexing agent for Pb[37] via a two-phase polar/nonpolar reaction with water by extraction
of CsBrinto the water phase[38] or by Cs
extraction with a chelating agent.[39] Other
variants on these have also been reported in the litaerature.[40−42] However, in all of these examples it is clear that either addition
or extraction of one of the metalions is responsible for the transformation.
We have shown that a simn>an class="Chemical">ilar transformation can be reversibly induced
by much more subtle modifications to the LHP NP surface via ligand
control, focusing on the mechanistics of phase transformation in terms
of crystal structure and habit.
Ligand-Mediated Phase and
Habit Transformations
of Perovskite Nanocrystals
Here we show how a robust reversible
transformatn>an class="Chemical">ion from CsPbX3 to rhombohedral Cs4PbX6 can be achieved via control of the OA to OLAmBrønsted
acid–base-type equilibrium. A small excess of OLAm over OAin a hexane solution of purified CsPbX3 NCs leads to the
spontaneous transformation from orthorhombic CsPbX3 NCs
to Cs4PbX6 NCs and vice versa even at room temperature.
Evidence of the conversion is the change in luminescence color. The
route for the structural transformation between CsPbI3 and
Cs4PbI6 is illustrated in Figure , where TEM images show that during the conversion
the cubic morphology of CsPbI3 NCs changes to rhombohedral.
Figure 3
Atomic-resolution
images of (a) CsPbI3 and (b) Cs4PbI6. CsPbI3 crystallizes in a perovskite
crystal structure with orthorhombic distortion in which PbX6 octahedra are corner-sharing. The cubic crystals are bound by facets
on (001) and (100) planes. The Cs4PbI6 structure
is rhombohedral with space group R3c. The typical 2-fold symmetry of the high-resolution
images of Cs4PbX6 is produced by the projection
of chains of PbX6 octahedra in the [122] viewing direction.
The habit is such that the rhombohedral crystals are formed by a layering
of densely packed PbX6 with interlayers of cations.
Atomic-resolutn>an class="Chemical">ion
images of (a) CsPbI3 and (b) Cs4PbI6. CsPbI3 crystallizes in a perovskite
crystal structure with orthorhombic distortion in which PbX6 octahedra are corner-sharing. The cubic crystals are bound by facets
on (001) and (100) planes. The Cs4PbI6 structure
is rhombohedral with space group R3c. The typical 2-fold symmetry of the high-resolution
images of Cs4PbX6 is produced by the projection
of chains of PbX6 octahedrain the [122] viewing direction.
The habit is such that the rhombohedral crystals are formed by a layering
of densely packed PbX6 with interlayers of cations.
The crystal structure of the cubic partn>an class="Chemical">icles (Figure a) exhibits a characteristic
tilt of the lead halideoctahedra and is in agreement with orthorhombic
space group Pnma. The cube facets of the CsPbI3 NCs are the trivial principal lattice planes (i.e., (100)
and (001)). The rhombohedral Cs4PbX6 phase (Figure b) corresponds to
the R3c crystal
structure. All rhombohedra share a common [122] viewing direction
with 2- fold symmetry. The rhomboidal cross section of the Cs4PbX6 crystals is determined by their (2–32)
and (−2–12) side facets, while (012) planes represent
the top and bottom facets. In this crystal habit, the rhombohedral
particles are characterized by a stack of layers of densely packed
PbX6 octahedra, alternating with an interlayer of Cs cations.
The truncation of rhombohedra cornersis found frequently and occurs
on densely packed PbX6 octahedra as well. Therefore, the
reversible transformation between the two phases involves a transition
between a 3D network of corner-shared PbX6 octahedrain
the orthorhombic phase to a 0D layered network of isolated PbX6 octahedrain the rhombohedral phase that are separated by
cation planes. In relation to the NC surface, the orthorhombic CsPbX3 phase as seen in Figure a could have either a highly negatively or a highly
positively charged surface (depending on the termination), while the
facets of the rhombohedral Cs4PbX6 phase exhibit
both PbX6 octahedra and Cs atoms and are thus expected
to be closer to neutral.
Elucidan>an class="Chemical">ting the transformation process
requires combining data
from several surface-sensitive spectroscopy modalities such as 1H NMR, FTIR, and XPS. Although each of these methods alone
reveals only a partial description of the system, the combination
gives a rather conclusive description of the major differences between
CsPbBr3 and Cs4PbBr6. The ligand
shell of CsPbBr3 is composed of bonded ammonium ligands
substituting for the Cs atom vacancies on the partial Cs-terminating
surface. In addition, Chen et al. showed that the oleate ligands bind
to exposed Cs or Pb surface atoms.[43]1H NMR measurements suggests that the ligand shell of Cs4PbBr6 is likely composed of both OLAm and OAin
a bonded state. In addition, Cs4PbBr6 surface
ligands seem to have a more restricted spatial configuration possibly
because of the rigidity of ammonium–oleateion pair capping.
This picture is in accordance with the Cs4PbBr6 surface composed of negatively charged PbBr6 octahedra
that are partially balanced by in-plane Csions, thus requiring passivation
by both negatively and positively charged ligands adsorbed on the
surface. In contrast, for CsPbBr3, the highly ionic nature
of the surface requires a strong ionic stabilization by ammonium substitution
of Cs vacancies. Interestingly, when secondary aliphatic amines such
as didodecylamine are used, such a phase transformation from CsPbBr3 to Cs4PbBr6 does not occur.[25] An NMR study indicates that in this case both
the acid and the secondary amineinteract with the NC surface. However,
a majority of the ligands present belong to oleate species by substitution
of Br– vacancies on a Pb-rich surface, while the
secondary amines are believed to detach from the surface due to large
steric repulsions between the ammonium groups.
The transformation
mechann>an class="Chemical">ism we proposed involves a change in the
surface ligand environment,[26,44] followed by recrystallization
induced by micelle formation[15] or soft
ligand templating.[22,45] This mechanism is supported by
the observation of intermediate stages in TEM images showing the gradual
decomposition of cubic CsPbX3 NCsinto lamellar structures,
thin sheets, platelets, and amorphous material coexisting in solution,
as also supported by the absorption spectra.
For the backward
transformation reactn>an class="Chemical">ion from Cs4PbBr6 to CsPbBr3, by monitoring the evolution of the
emission spectrum over the course of the reaction, we found that different
peaks emerged and disappeared at discrete wavelengths corresponding
to discrete thicknesses of several perovskite MLs (Figure ). This suggests an exfoliation[46] process aided by excess oleic acid followed
by ionic sphere rearrangement and recrystallization as also suggested
by Liu et al.[37] This model is supported
by Baranov et al.,[47] where the analysis
of the volume change of single Cs4PbBr6 NCs
to CsPbBr3 gave rise to the conclusion that dissolution–recrystallization
processes should indeed play an important role in this transformation
and not just the gradual removal of CsBr from each individual NC.
Figure 4
Selective
transformation of Cs4PbBr6 NCs
to CsPbBr3 NCs of different thicknesses. (a–c) TEM
images of the CsPbBr3 samples emitting at 410, 432, and
490 nm, respectively. (d) Absorption and emission spectra of CsPbBr3 NCs. Five different absorption and emission peaks correspond
to five different thicknesses (1–10 unit cells). Emission peaks
from left to right: 410 nm (1 ML), 432 nm (2 MLs), 460 nm (5 MLs),
479 nm (8 MLs), and 488 nm (10 MLs).
Selective
transformatn>an class="Chemical">ion of Cs4PbBr6 NCs
to CsPbBr3 NCs of different thicknesses. (a–c) TEM
images of the CsPbBr3 samples emitting at 410, 432, and
490 nm, respectively. (d) Absorption and emission spectra of CsPbBr3 NCs. Five different absorption and emission peaks correspond
to five different thicknesses (1–10 unit cells). Emission peaks
from left to right: 410 nm (1 ML), 432 nm (2 MLs), 460 nm (5 MLs),
479 nm (8 MLs), and 488 nm (10 MLs).
Surface Thermodynamics
Bulk semiconductors
tend to crystalln>an class="Chemical">ize into a thermodynamically stable structure under
ambient conditions, and metastable structures can be obtained only
at elevated temperatures/pressures. In contrast, nanosized semiconductor
colloidal crystallites with various crystal structures can be obtained
under mild conditions. It is contemplated that metal–organic
complex precursors of high reactivity are likely to rapidly decompose
into a thermodynamically favored phase, while less reactive complexes
lead to the formation of the kinetically (thermally) favored one.
Moreover, it was shown that phase change can occur, controlled by
the type of surface ligands.[48] For example,
the transformation of wurtzite CdSeinto zinc blende and vice versa
depends on carboxylic acid to amine surface passivation.[49,50] Two main considerations should be taken into account in the case
of perovskite NCs. The first is that in the more common II–VI
or III–V semiconductor NCs the breaking of covalent bonds requires
higher temperatures, with the highly ionic character of the metalhalideperovskites rendering them much more liable for decomposition.
Second, charge balance is required.
De Roo et al. show that
there is a dynamn>an class="Chemical">ic stabilization of oleylammonium bromidein solution
and that the binding strength relies on controlled acid–base
equilibrium.[26] Quarta et al.[51] reported a comprehensive study over a range
of amine ligands (and their conjugated acids) with different basicity,
chain length, and steric hindrance, demonstrating that the ligand
binding affinity and the ligand-to-NC molar ratio (also through acid–base
equilibrium) control the surface coordination.
In more detan>an class="Chemical">il,
CsPbX3 can be viewed as constituted
by a stoichiometric CsPbX3 core, which exposes an inner
PbX2 shell and an outer, labile shell made up of −NH3+Br– or Cs+–COO– species. In addition, the binding of ligands at the surface can
follow either a substitution mechanism or an addition mechanism such
that −NH3+ replaces Cs+ on the surface
and −COO– replaces Br– or
that −NH3+ adsorbs to Br– and
−COO– absorbs to Cs+.[51] In addition, charge-neutral ligands (−NH2, chelating ligands) can induce the removal of PbX2, and positively charged species compete with Cs+ions,
by analogy to etching of metal chalcogenide NCsinduced by amines.
Namely, there is a trade-off between ligand binding on the surface
and surface atoms being removed to expose the “inner”
bulk atoms, which is intrinsically related to the solubility of the
involved species. The binding energy of a ligand at the surface is
governed by two parameters: the energy gain of formation of hydrogen
bonds and the penalty of the surface reconstruction energy.
Specifn>an class="Chemical">ic synthesis conditions, such as ligand-to-metal molar ratios
and temperature[21,51] that affect the equilibrium of
different reactions involved in the synthesis via acid–base
reactions and PbX2 dissociation, have great cooperative
effects on surface passivation, and there are many examples of ammonium–oleate[52] and oleate-only[53] ligand passivation motifs. However, global favored surface passivation
seems to apply here: Ravi et al.[29] confirmed
the CsPbX3 surface passivation by OLA+ by DFT
calculations, showing that the energy cost of the substitution mechanism
for surface reconstruction is in fact low. In contrast, there is an
energy gain by the formation of three hydrogen bonds among the −NH3+ moiety of oleylammonium and surrounding Br– on the surface. This is corroborated by the experimental work of
Smock et al.,[30] where temperature-dependent 1H NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the thermodynamic
exchange parameters of OA and OLA with the surface, concluding that
although both ligand-exchange processes are indeed favorable at room
temperature (negative ΔGs), for the exchange
reaction with carboxylic acid, the enthalpy and entropy terms are
positive in sign, while they are negative for OLA (energy gain). Most
interestingly, OA/OLA-capped CsPbBr3–I exchanged with oleylammoniumiodide and lead undecenoate resulted in only low-density coverage
of oleylammonium bromide on the surface and rapid morphological degradation
as the iodide ratio increased, in contrast to similar CsPbBr3 NCs tested.[52] This again indicates a
scenario of favorable ligand affinity of ammonium over oleate to stabilize
CsPbI3in its optically active perovskite phase.[54]
Another example of the effect of surface
thermodynamin>an class="Chemical">csis the
use of alkyl phosphonic acids that produces an orthorhombic truncated
octahedron through the favorable binding affinity to the Pb cation
over the Cs one, thus exposing facets that are not observed in the
orthorhombic phase produced by the typical acid–base type of
reactions discussed above.[55] A preferred
substitution mechanism over adsorption is in stark contrast to the
usual adsorption of organic ligands on the surface of typical covalent
NCs. Moreover, this implies a unique interaction between the organic
capping ligands and the inorganic core that can result in more extensive
electronic interactions at the interface than in typical NCs.
Molecular Control of Perovskite-Based Junctions
A p–n
junction structure n>an class="Chemical">is the common choice of electronic
architecture in optoelectronic devices such as LEDs, photodiodes,
and photovoltaics. A built-in electric field formed across the junction
enhances the spatial separation and selective transport of the photoinduced
electrons/holes, thus decreasing possible carrier recombination losses.
In this respect, halideperovskites possess some unique properties
as detailed below.
Efficn>an class="Chemical">ient chemical doping was demonstrated
by a MoO3 layer deposited on top of CH3NH3PbI3 nanosheets, showing a remarkably broad depletion
region of up to
10 μm and a relatively high electric field of ∼0.5 eV;
defect-induced self-doping as demonstrated by a MAPbI3 homojunction,
created by different ratios of MA to Pb of two MAPbI3 layers
grown one on top of the other;[56] and a
localized phase transition demonstrated by localized heating of a
single CsSnI3 perovskite nanowire (NW) forming a p–n
junction owing to the difference in formation energies of the cation
and anion vacancies between the two phases.[57] Band gap engineering through modification of the perovskite composition
was demonstrated by anion exchange suggested for display pixel application.[58] A gradient heterostructure photovoltaic cell
based on a tolerance factor was demonstrated through the spontaneous
doping of two sides of a FA0.9Cs0.1PbI3 perovskite thin film by “intolerant” n-type heteroatoms
(Sb3+, In3+) with mismatched cation sizes and
charge states.[59] Band gap engineering was
also demonstrated by the solution growth of vertically stacked double
heterostructures and complex multilayer heterostructures of 2D lead
iodideperovskites [(C6H5(CH2)2NH3+)2(MA)PbnI3]. Here the surface-bound ligands
serve as spatial barriers to prevent ion migration across the junctions
shown to enhance LED performance.[60,61]
However,
although molecular linkers have been known to modify p–n
junctions, they have not been explored in the field of perovskite
structures.[62,63] To explore the effect of molecular
linkers on the electronic coupling in junction geometry, we chose
to work with two prototypical systems, representing an LHP and a standard
semiconductor coupled by an organic molecule. This system was also
explored by Brumberg et al. but rather on a mixture of LHP and CdSe
NCs with the native long-chain ligands, showing that the rate of electron
transfer is dependent on the NC dimensionality.[64] Here, NPs of CsPbBr3 and CdSeNPLs were linked
by a bifunctionalized molecular linker, creating an analogue of nano
p–n junctions with the built-in field depending on the nature
of the linker molecule at the interface. Understanding the physics
of charge transport across the molecular linkers as well as the characterization
of interfacial electric fields and electrostatic changes taking place
at related domains can provide a rational approach toward device design
and optimization.
Charge-Transfer Processes
in CsPbBr3/CdSe NPLs Hybrids Coupled by Molecular Linkers
The nature
of electronic coupln>an class="Chemical">ing and the effect of surface modifications on
the interfacial charge-transfer dynamics upon hybrid formation were
investigated for a system of lead halide-based perovskite NCs (CsPbBr3) and 2D colloidal II–VI semiconductor NCs (CdSeNPLs)—cross-linked para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) and glycine (Gly) molecular
ligands—and compared with a mixture of the two species with
their native long-chain ligands.
The surfaces of Csn>an class="Chemical">PbBr3 NPLs and CdSeNPLs with similar band gap energies were chemically
modified to replace the native OA and OLA ligands with bifunctionalized
ligands that have a carboxylic acid at one end and an amine at the
other. Directional linking of the two materials at the single-particle
level was achieved by preferential binding of the amine to CsPbBr3 and the carboxylic acid to CdSe and was verified by XPS elemental
line analysis combined with FTIR measurements as depicted in the cartoon
presented in Figure a. Comparing the binding energies of core-electron levels, as calculated
from XPS measurements, of the hybrid CdSe/CsPbBr3 nanoparticle
films with the corresponding ones made from the two individual nanomaterials
(native capped CsPbBr3 and CdSe) gave information on the
local electrostatic potential changes between the constituents upon
complexation. Figure b illustrates the energy-level modifications upon hybridization.
The red arrows in Figure b, pointing from black to red conduction bands (CBs), express
the charge transfer, which is a consequence of Fermi level equilibration
upon hybridization (depicted by the dashed black line). The effect
is a step-like change in the local vacuum level that opens up, similar
to a p–n junction, with increased electron density at the CdSe
(which serves as the p-type component) and reduced electron density
at the perovskite (the n-type analogue). Our results show significant
electron transfer from the perovskite to the CdSe when linked by PABA
and even more so by the Gly molecules with total (relative) changes
of 700 and 1095 meV in binding energies, respectively. In contrast,
with the electrically insulating long OA capping molecules this effect
is very minor, well below 100 meV.
Figure 5
(A) Scheme depicting the CsPbBr3 NC linked by PABA to
CdSe NPL. (B) Band diagrams of the hybrid systems (red lines) with
indicated ligands, drawn relative to the system’s Fermi level.
VB and CB of the pure systems are drawn as well (black lines), corresponding
respectively to the top of the valence band and the bottom of the
conduction band before complexation. Arrows indicate the electrostatic
changes upon hybridization. The local vacuum level at the two constituents
of the hybrid structure is indicated by the upper red lines. Technically,
the vacuum level in the perovskite domains (indicted by the top red
line) was extracted directly from the work-function measurements,
whereas the one in the CdSe domains (top dashed red line) could not
be resolved from secondary onsets and hence was deduced indirectly
(with no compromise in accuracy) from the electrostatic information
provided by the elemental core line shifts (an average over corresponding
elements).
(A) Scheme depicn>an class="Chemical">ting the CsPbBr3 NC linked by PABA to
CdSeNPL. (B) Band diagrams of the hybrid systems (red lines) with
indicated ligands, drawn relative to the system’s Fermi level.
VB and CB of the pure systems are drawn as well (black lines), corresponding
respectively to the top of the valence band and the bottom of the
conduction band before complexation. Arrows indicate the electrostatic
changes upon hybridization. The local vacuum level at the two constituents
of the hybrid structure is indicated by the upper red lines. Technically,
the vacuum level in the perovskite domains (indicted by the top red
line) was extracted directly from the work-function measurements,
whereas the one in the CdSe domains (top dashed red line) could not
be resolved from secondary onsets and hence was deduced indirectly
(with no compromise in accuracy) from the electrostatic information
provided by the elemental core line shifts (an average over corresponding
elements).
Owing to the nano dn>an class="Chemical">imensions of
the hybrid system, the distribution
of space–charge becomes an intriguing question. The preserved
XPS elemental line widths suggest that the two constituent particles
stabilize a roughly uniform potential, which suggests that the interface
field is restricted to the molecular linkers. This can be justified
by the fact that these molecules are inherently dipolar and therefore
can withstand the electrostatic load. However, if the transferred
charge is restricted to the interface, then one should encounter significant
line broadening, which is not the case here, as verified experimentally.
This observation is due to the limited (nano) size of the two constituents,
which leads to space–charge that is distributed effectively
over the entire particle. Hence, the interface field is believed to
be predominantly restricted to the spacer, the linking molecular layer.
Complementary to the charge transfer at equiln>an class="Chemical">ibrium, another photoinduced
charge-transfer process was investigated by XPS analyses of the samples’
photoresponse to in situ white light illumination, thus gaining accessibility
to the photodynamicsin the hybrid system. A clear signature of electron
transfer from the CdSe to the perovskite domains is revealed by opposite
response signs at the two constituents. The photovoltage values found
for the perovskite elemental lines in the PABA hybrid are, on average,
120 mV, whereas for CdSe we get 35 mV, reflecting a steady-state situation
where the average charge density on each side of the junction is modified
by the photoinduced electron transfer from the electron-rich CdSe
side to the perovskite across the molecular layer. Accordingly, for
the OA-capped hybrid, where the interface field is negligible, no
photoinduced charge transport is observed. The light-induced XPS findings
described above are consistent with measurements of the optical properties
of hybrid films, such as absorption, PL, and PL lifetime measurements.
Both the red-shifted PL and the extended PL lifetimes upon hybridization
suggest radiative recombination originating from excitons that are
spatially delocalized across the hybrid material, thus decreasing
the overlap of electron and hole wave functions. The small extent
of this effect is in line with the nearly zero band offsets deduced
from XPS. Notably, the XPS complemented by in situ photovoltage measurements
revealed that the type II emission properties have only a residual
contribution over the pronounced charge-transfer effects driven by
a large built-in field, restricted to the very narrow domain of the
linking molecules at the CsPbBr3/CdSeNPL hybrids interface.
Summary and Perspectives
Although colloidal
n>an class="Chemical">LHP NCs have an advantage over perovskite thin
films in terms of production costs and material synthesis versatility,
there are inherent challenges concerning their ligand passivation.
Delicate changes in the ligand environment can have a dramatic effect
on the stoichiometry, crystal structure, and habit of LHP NCs and
consequently on device stability. Small changes in OA to OLAmBrønsted
acid–base-type equilibrium promote, for example, the transition
from cubic to orthorhombic CsPbI3 or the reversible transformation
from cubic CsPbI3 to rhombohedral Cs4PbI6. Surface analysis suggests that phase transformations occur
through a thermodynamic surface stabilization provided by the ligand
shell. For Cs4PbBr6, the surface is passivated
by an oleate–ammonium complex that can better stabilize the
overall neutral charged surface composed of negatively charged PbBr6 octahedra partially balanced by in-plane Cs+ions.
In contrast, for CsPbBr3, the highly ionic nature of the
surface requires a strong ionic stabilization where ammonium ligands
partially substitute for Cs+in the terminating A sites.
Altogether, a rich pathway for controlling and stabilizing both the
stoichiometry and structure of perovskite NCs in situ and postsynthesis
was demonstrated.
Surface passivatn>an class="Chemical">ion also plays an important
role at the interface
between two materials, determining charge carrier generation and extraction
efficiencies. A p–n-like junction between CsPbBr3 and CdSeNPLs, linked molecular ligands, was demonstrated. A pronounced
charge-transfer effect driven by a large built-in field was demonstrated,
controlled by the choice of ligand, changing the effective band diagram
of the hybrid material. Interestingly, these large built-in fields
are restricted to the very narrow domain of the linking molecules
at the CsPbBr3/CdSeNPL hybrids interface. To conclude,
insights gained from LHP NC surface analysis can aid in improving
their stability, leading to their enhanced performance in applications
such as photovoltaics and optoelectronics and possibly as a more sensitive
test bed for the study of effects that are crucial to the long-term
stability of LHP-based devices, such as self-healing.[52] Finally, the use of surface ligands offers an interesting
knob for generating and harnessing internal built-in fields in heterogeneous
nanocrystal solids toward the implementation of these in new types
of optoelectronic devices.
Authors: Patrick R Brown; Donghun Kim; Richard R Lunt; Ni Zhao; Moungi G Bawendi; Jeffrey C Grossman; Vladimir Bulović Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Luciana C Schmidt; Antonio Pertegás; Soranyel González-Carrero; Olga Malinkiewicz; Said Agouram; Guillermo Mínguez Espallargas; Henk J Bolink; Raquel E Galian; Julia Pérez-Prieto Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Verena A Hintermayr; Alexander F Richter; Florian Ehrat; Markus Döblinger; Willem Vanderlinden; Jasmina A Sichert; Yu Tong; Lakshminarayana Polavarapu; Jochen Feldmann; Alexander S Urban Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Lara Kelly Ribeiro; Amanda Fernandes Gouveia; Francisco das Chagas M Silva; Luís F G Noleto; Marcelo Assis; André M Batista; Laécio S Cavalcante; Eva Guillamón; Ieda L V Rosa; Elson Longo; Juan Andrés; Geraldo E Luz Júnior Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 5.719