Literature DB >> 33570260

Postapproval Comparative Safety Study of Tofacitinib and Biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: 5-Year Results from a United States-Based Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry.

Joel M Kremer1, Clifton O Bingham2, Laura C Cappelli2, Jeffrey D Greenberg3, Ann M Madsen4, Jamie Geier4, Jose L Rivas5, Alina M Onofrei6, Christine J Barr6, Dimitrios A Pappas7, Heather J Litman6, Kimberly J Dandreo6, Andrea B Shapiro8, Carol A Connell9, Arthur Kavanaugh10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared 5-year adverse event (AE) incidence rates (IRs) between patients initiating tofacitinib and those initiating new biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) within the United States (US) Corrona RA registry.
METHODS: IRs (number of first events/100 patient-years) of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious infection events (SIEs), herpes zoster (HZ), malignancies, and death were estimated among tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators, regardless of dose/schedule, between November 6, 2012 (US Food and Drug Administration tofacitinib approval), and July 31, 2018 (follow-up through January 31, 2019). Propensity score (PS) methods were used to control for nonrandom prescribing practices. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated to compare rates using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. Different risk windows were used for acute (MACE, SIEs, HZ, and venous thromboembolic events [VTEs]) and long-term (malignancy and death) events. VTEs were assessed descriptively.
RESULTS: For MACE, SIEs, and HZ, 1999 (3152.1 patient-years) and 8358 (12 869.4 years) tofacitinib and bDMARD initiators were included, respectively; for malignancy/death, 1999 (4505.6 patient-years) and 6354 (16 670.8 patient-years) initiators were included, respectively. AE rates were similar across cohorts, except for HZ, which was significantly higher with tofacitinib versus bDMARDs (PS-trimmed adjusted HR 2.32; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-3.75). There were 45 (zero serious) and 88 (five serious) HZ events with tofacitinib and bDMARDs, respectively. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated similar results. VTE IRs (95% CI) were 0.29 (0.13-0.54) and 0.33 (0.24-0.45) for tofacitinib and bDMARDs, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In this registry analysis, both cohorts had similar MACE, SIE, malignancy, death, and VTE rates; HZ rates were higher for tofacitinib initaitors than for bDMARD initiators.
© 2021 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33570260     DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACR Open Rheumatol        ISSN: 2578-5745


  12 in total

1.  [Management of inflammatory rheumatic diseases during and after malignancies].

Authors:  Marc Schmalzing
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Tofacitinib and Risk of Malignancy: Results From the Safety of Tofacitinib in Routine Care Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (STAR-RA) Study.

Authors:  Farzin Khosrow-Khavar; Rishi J Desai; Hemin Lee; Su Been Lee; Seoyoung C Kim
Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 15.483

Review 3.  Cardiovascular risks associated with Janus kinase inhibitors: peering outside the black box.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Gaurav Pande; Vikas Agarwal
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Tofacitinib and risk of cardiovascular outcomes: results from the Safety of TofAcitinib in Routine care patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (STAR-RA) study.

Authors:  Farzin Khosrow-Khavar; Seoyoung C Kim; Hemin Lee; Su Been Lee; Rishi J Desai
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 27.973

Review 5.  JAK-STAT signaling in human disease: From genetic syndromes to clinical inhibition.

Authors:  Yiming Luo; Madison Alexander; Massimo Gadina; John J O'Shea; Francoise Meylan; Daniella M Schwartz
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 14.290

Review 6.  Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with Janus kinase inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: case presentation and literature review.

Authors:  Shunsuke Mori; Fumihiko Ogata; Ryusuke Tsunoda
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  Oral surveillance and JAK inhibitor safety: the theory of relativity.

Authors:  Kevin L Winthrop; Stanley B Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 32.286

8.  Benefit-Risk Analysis of Upadacitinib Compared with Adalimumab in the Treatment of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Philip Conaghan; Stanley Cohen; Gerd Burmester; Eduardo Mysler; Peter Nash; Yoshiya Tanaka; William Rigby; Jayeshkumar Patel; Tim Shaw; Keith A Betts; Pankaj Patel; Jianzhong Liu; Rochelle Sun; Roy Fleischmann
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2021-11-23

Review 9.  Perspectives of JAK Inhibitors for Large Vessel Vasculitis.

Authors:  Ryu Watanabe; Motomu Hashimoto
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Jakinibs of All Trades: Inhibiting Cytokine Signaling in Immune-Mediated Pathologies.

Authors:  Madison Alexander; Yiming Luo; Giorgio Raimondi; John J O'Shea; Massimo Gadina
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.