| Literature DB >> 33569686 |
Abstract
Vietnam has achieved impressive economic growth principally supported by foreign direct investment (FDI) in the last three decades. However, environmental deterioration is observed. No studies have ever been conducted to examine the link between economic growth and environmental degradation, focusing on the important role of the FDI, in Vietnam in both short run and long run. Using the ARDL and the threshold regression techniques for 35 years from 1986, Vietnam's "Doi Moi" (economic renovation), the U-shaped relationship between economic growth and the environmental quality is found in the long run and at the upper threshold of economic growth. FDI in the long run and at the upper threshold of economic growth also leads to further deterioration of the environmental quality. Also, consumption of fossil fuel energy deteriorates the environment in the long run, and at any level of economic growth. These findings simply mean that Vietnam has to adopt a new growth model with the focus on the quality FDI projects and clean energy sources to achieve the dual objectives: (i) sustained economic growth and (ii) improved environmental quality.Entities:
Keywords: ARDL; Economic growth; Environmental degradation; FDI; Threshold regression; Vietnam
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33569686 PMCID: PMC7875433 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12838-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1A pattern of energy consumption in Vietnam
Fig. 2GDP per capita and CO2 emissions in Vietnam from 1986 to 2018
Descriptive statistics, 1986 to 2018
| Variable | Observation | Mean | Std. dev. | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO2 emissions per capita (tons of CO2 emissions) | 33 | 0.910 | 0.644 | 0.251 | 2.481 |
| GDP per capita | 33 | 961.852 | 477.621 | 384.822 | 1964.476 |
| Fossil energy consumption | 33 | 1.020 | 0.809 | 0.214 | 2.961 |
| Renewable energy consumption | 33 | 0.240 | 0.217 | 0.014 | 0.799 |
| FDI inflow (% of GDP) | 33 | 5.237 | 2.869 | 0.000 | 11.939 |
Results from the augmented Dickey-Fuller test for unit root
| Variable | Modified Dicky-Fuller | Augmented Dicky-Fuller | Phillips-Peron |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit-root test at the level | |||
| CO2 emissions per capita | −2.78 | 0.64 | −10.30 |
| GDP per capita | −2.72 | −0.52 | −10.47 |
| Squared of GDP per capita | −2.16 | 0.46*** | −11.97*** |
| GDP per capita growth rate | −1.88 | −4.99*** | −14.59*** |
| Fossil energy consumption per capita | −2.74 | 0.51 | −9.91 |
| Renewable energy consumption per capita | −2.82 | −2.71* | −8.13 |
| Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP) | −0.80 | −4.16*** | −13.06*** |
| Unit-root test at the first difference | |||
| CO2 emissions per capita | −4.66*** | −4.31*** | −29.46*** |
| GDP per capita | −4.97 | −3.44*** | −14.23** |
| Squared of GDP per capita | −5.18 | −3.29** | −14.23* |
| Fossil energy consumption per capita | −4.36*** | −4.13*** | −28.59*** |
| Renewable energy consumption per capita | −4.04*** | −3.78*** | −26.31*** |
| Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP) | −2.164 | −3.41** | −32.64*** |
All variables are in the log transformation form
*, **, and *** are 1, 5, and 10% level of significance, respectively
Results on the FDI-growth-environment nexus using the ARDL technique
| The dependent variable is CO2 emissions per capita | Estimated coefficient | Standard error |
|---|---|---|
| Error correction adjustment coefficient | −0.65** | 0.23 |
| Long-term coefficient | ||
| GDP per capita | −2.15*** | 0.42 |
| Squared of GDP per capita | 0.13*** | 0.02 |
| Fossil energy consumption per capita | 1.19*** | 0.09 |
| Renewable energy consumption per capita | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP) | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Short-term coefficient | ||
| GDP per capita | −5.69 | 5.07 |
| GDP per capita (1-year lag) | 0.12 | 4.85 |
| Squared of GDP per capita | 0.45 | 0.39 |
| Squared of GDP per capita (1-year lag) | −0.01 | 0.37 |
| Fossil energy consumption per capita | 0.44 | 0.28 |
| Renewable energy consumption per capita | 0.05* | 0.02 |
| Renewable energy consumption per capita (1-year lag) | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP) | −0.01* | 0.00 |
| Constant | 20.25** | 7.74 |
| Observations | 31 | |
| R-squared | 0.99 | |
| Durbin’s alternative test for autocorrelation | (0.73) | |
| LM test for autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) | (0.78) | |
| White’s test for homoscedasticity | (0.42) | |
| Breusch-Pagan / Cook-Weisberg test for heteroscedasticity | (0.19) | |
All variable is used in log transformation form; Tested p values are in round bracket
*, **, and *** are 1%, 5%, and 10% level of significance, respectively
Results on FDI-growth-environment nexus from the threshold regressions
| The dependent variable is CO2 emissions per capita | Estimated coefficient | Standard error |
|---|---|---|
| Region 1 | GDP per capita < $765.18 | |
| GDP per capita | 0.80 | 1.75 |
| Squared of GDP per capita | −0.12 | 0.15 |
| Fossil energy consumption per capita | 1.29*** | 0.10 |
| Renewable energy consumption per capita | 0.10*** | 0.04 |
| Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP) | −0.01*** | 0.00 |
| Constant | 25.57*** | 5.10 |
| Region 2 | GDP per capita ≥ $765.18 | |
| GDP per capita | −2.64*** | 0.35 |
| Squared of GDP per capita | 0.16*** | 0.03 |
| Fossil energy consumption per capita | 1.22*** | 0.01 |
| Renewable energy consumption per capita | 0.05*** | 0.01 |
| Foreign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP) | 0.02*** | 0.00 |
| Constant | 33.87*** | 1.11 |
Threshold (GDP per capita) is at $765.18; all variables are in the log transformation form; *, **, and *** denote 1%, 5%, and 10% level of significance, respectively
Fig. 3Results from the Toda–Yamamoto approach for Granger causality test. The arrow represents a significant direction for Granger causality