Keiichi Takehana1, Daisuke Nakamura1,2, Alshaymaa Abdelghaffar1,3, Megumi Uto1, Tomohiro Katagiri1, Yoshiki Arakawa4, Yohei Mineharu4, Susumu Miyamoto4, Takashi Mizowaki5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. 2. Department of Radiological Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. 3. Department of Clinical Oncology, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. mizo@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological change patterns in skull base meningiomas after conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (CFSRT) to determine a simple and valid method to assess the tumor response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with a benign skull base meningioma treated by CFSRT from March 2007 to August 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. We measured tumor volume (TV), long-axis diameter (LD), and short-axis diameter (SD) on both pre-treatment images and follow-up images of 1, 3, and 5 years after CFSRT, respectively. The paired t test was used to detect differences in the LD and SD change rates. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relationships between the TV and the diameters changes. RESULTS: The number of available follow-up MRIs that was performed at 1, 3, and 5 years after the CFSRT was 41 (100%), 34 (83%), and 23 (56%), respectively. The change rates of SD were significantly higher than those of LD at every time point and more strongly correlated with the change rates of tumor volume at 3 and 5 years after CFSRT. CONCLUSIONS: SD may be useful as a simple indicator of the tumor response for skull base meningioma after CFSRT. KEY POINTS: • The change rate in short-axis diameter is a useful and simple indicator of the response of skull base meningioma to conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. • Conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for skull base meningioma achieved excellent 5-year local control.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the radiological change patterns in skull base meningiomas after conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (CFSRT) to determine a simple and valid method to assess the tumor response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients with a benign skull base meningioma treated by CFSRT from March 2007 to August 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. We measured tumor volume (TV), long-axis diameter (LD), and short-axis diameter (SD) on both pre-treatment images and follow-up images of 1, 3, and 5 years after CFSRT, respectively. The paired t test was used to detect differences in the LD and SD change rates. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relationships between the TV and the diameters changes. RESULTS: The number of available follow-up MRIs that was performed at 1, 3, and 5 years after the CFSRT was 41 (100%), 34 (83%), and 23 (56%), respectively. The change rates of SD were significantly higher than those of LD at every time point and more strongly correlated with the change rates of tumor volume at 3 and 5 years after CFSRT. CONCLUSIONS: SD may be useful as a simple indicator of the tumor response for skull base meningioma after CFSRT. KEY POINTS: • The change rate in short-axis diameter is a useful and simple indicator of the response of skull base meningioma to conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. • Conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for skull base meningioma achieved excellent 5-year local control.
Authors: Emily Tanzler; Christopher G Morris; Jessica M Kirwan; Robert J Amdur; William M Mendenhall Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Nathan W Uy; Shiao Y Woo; Bin S Teh; Wei Yuan Mai; L Steven Carpenter; Joseph K Chiu; Hsin H Lu; Phillip Gildenberg; Todd Trask; Walter H Grant; E Brian Butler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Michael T Selch; Eugene Ahn; Ashkan Laskari; Steve P Lee; Nhzde Agazaryan; Timothy D Solberg; Cynthia Cabatan-Awang; Leonardo Frighetto; Antonio A F Desalles Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038