Literature DB >> 33569115

Lengthening of Massive Intercalary Cortical Allograft After Successful Graft Incorporation in Skeletally Immature Bone with Critical-Sized Defect: A Case Report with 6-year Follow-up.

Ferdiansyah Mahyudin1, Kukuh Dwiputra Hernugrahanto1, Jeffry Andrianus1, Lukas Widhiyanto1, Mouli Edward1, Heri Suroto1.   

Abstract

Bone allograft serves as an alternative to overcome the limitation of autograft. Some concerns, such as graft rejection, infection, and low union rate, arise from the use of bone allograft since the graft is a non-living and foreign material. We reported a case of critical-sized bone defect in a skeletally immature patient treated with massive intercalary allograft that not only did it show union but also graft incorporation that allowed for subsequent bone lengthening at the site of the incorporated massive allograft. To our knowledge, there has been a report of lengthening of free-vascularized fibular autograft but not the nonvascularized one. Massive intercalary allograft that incorporates well to the host could be an option to treat critical-sized bone defect. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone lengthening; Critical-sized defect; Massive intercalary allograft

Year:  2020        PMID: 33569115      PMCID: PMC7851305          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00087-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  11 in total

Review 1.  How to improve the incorporation of massive allografts?

Authors:  C Delloye
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec

2.  Factors affecting outcome of massive intercalary bone allografts in the treatment of tumours of the femur.

Authors:  T Frisoni; L Cevolani; A Giorgini; B Dozza; D M Donati
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-06

Review 3.  Bone allografts: What they can offer and what they cannot.

Authors:  C Delloye; O Cornu; V Druez; O Barbier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-05

Review 4.  Factors affecting bone graft incorporation.

Authors:  S Stevenson; S E Emery; V M Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Survival of massive allografts in segmental oncological bone defect reconstructions.

Authors:  P H J Bullens; N M Minderhoud; M C de Waal Malefijt; R P H Veth; P Buma; H W B Schreuder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss.

Authors:  D Paley; M A Catagni; F Argnani; A Villa; G B Benedetti; R Cattaneo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Long-term Results of Osteoarticular Allograft Reconstruction in Children with Distal Femoral Bone Tumors.

Authors:  Khodamorad Jamshidi; Mehrdad Bahrabadi; Alireza Mirzaei
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 8.  The biology of bone lengthening.

Authors:  Ivan Hvid; Joachim Horn; Stefan Huhnstock; Harald Steen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Combination of bone marrow aspirate, cancellous bone allograft, and platelet-rich plasma as an alternative solution to critical-sized diaphyseal bone defect: A case series.

Authors:  Dwikora Novembri Utomo; Kukuh Dwiputra Hernugrahanto; Mouli Edward; Lukas Widhiyanto; Ferdiansyah Mahyudin
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-16

Review 10.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.