| Literature DB >> 33569115 |
Ferdiansyah Mahyudin1, Kukuh Dwiputra Hernugrahanto1, Jeffry Andrianus1, Lukas Widhiyanto1, Mouli Edward1, Heri Suroto1.
Abstract
Bone allograft serves as an alternative to overcome the limitation of autograft. Some concerns, such as graft rejection, infection, and low union rate, arise from the use of bone allograft since the graft is a non-living and foreign material. We reported a case of critical-sized bone defect in a skeletally immature patient treated with massive intercalary allograft that not only did it show union but also graft incorporation that allowed for subsequent bone lengthening at the site of the incorporated massive allograft. To our knowledge, there has been a report of lengthening of free-vascularized fibular autograft but not the nonvascularized one. Massive intercalary allograft that incorporates well to the host could be an option to treat critical-sized bone defect. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Bone lengthening; Critical-sized defect; Massive intercalary allograft
Year: 2020 PMID: 33569115 PMCID: PMC7851305 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00087-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251