Literature DB >> 33568938

Development and Psychometric Testing of the Japanese Version of the Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Yuh Yamashita1,2, Tomohiko Nishigami3, Akira Mibu4, Katsuyoshi Tanaka5, Benedict M Wand6, Mark J Catley7, Toshio Higashi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contemporary theories of pain suggest that how the body is perceived is central to the emergence of pain. The Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire (FreBAQ) was developed to assess body-perception specific to the back in people with chronic low back pain. However, there is no comprehensive measure to quantify self-perception of the painful area in Japanese people with neck pain. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of a self-perception questionnaire specific to the neck and evaluate the validity and reliability of the scale using Rasch analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire (FreNAQ-J) was developed by modifying the FreBAQ-J. One hundred people with chronic neck pain and fifty-six matched healthy controls completed the questionnaire. Rasch analysis was used to evaluate targeting, category order, unidimensionality, person fit, internal consistency, differential item functioning, and differential test functioning in the neck pain population. Validity was investigated by examining the relationship between the FreNAQ-J and clinical status.
RESULTS: People with chronic neck pain endorsed FreNAQ-J items with greater frequency than healthy controls. FreNAQ-J did not reject the null hypothesis of fitting the Rasch model, had acceptable internal consistency and good test-retest reliability. Summed FreNAQ-J scores were significantly correlated with pain intensity, disability, pain-related catastrophizing and fear of movement.
CONCLUSION: The individual items of the FreNAQ-J can be validly summed to provide a score of self-perception. The FreNAQ-J is the first scale developed for comprehensively evaluating disturbed body perception in Japanese patients with chronic neck pain.
© 2021 Yamashita et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rasch analysis; neck pain; neck-specific body-perception questionnaire; reliability and validity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33568938      PMCID: PMC7870290          DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S267930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Res        ISSN: 1178-7090            Impact factor:   3.133


  56 in total

1.  Extensive reorganization of primary somatosensory cortex in chronic back pain patients.

Authors:  H Flor; C Braun; T Elbert; N Birbaumer
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-03-07       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?

Authors:  Alan Tennant; Philip G Conaghan
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-12-15

3.  Critical Values for Yen's Q3: Identification of Local Dependence in the Rasch Model Using Residual Correlations.

Authors:  Karl Bang Christensen; Guido Makransky; Mike Horton
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-11-16

4.  The development of the Dutch version of the Fremantle Back Awareness Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lotte Janssens; Nina Goossens; Benedict M Wand; Madelon Pijnenburg; Tinne Thys; Simon Brumagne
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 5.  Targeting cortical representations in the treatment of chronic pain: a review.

Authors:  G Lorimer Moseley; Herta Flor
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-J) in patients with whiplash neck injury pain and/or low back pain.

Authors:  Norimasa Kikuchi; Ko Matsudaira; Takayuki Sawada; Hiroyuki Oka
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 1.601

Review 7.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 8.  Role of distorted body image in pain.

Authors:  Martin Lotze; G L Moseley
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Population health and regional variations of disease burden in Japan, 1990-2015: a systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors:  Shuhei Nomura; Haruka Sakamoto; Scott Glenn; Yusuke Tsugawa; Sarah K Abe; Md M Rahman; Jonathan C Brown; Satoshi Ezoe; Christina Fitzmaurice; Tsuyoshi Inokuchi; Nicholas J Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Yosuke Kita; Naoki Kondo; Stephen S Lim; Satoshi Maruyama; Hiroaki Miyata; Meghan D Mooney; Mohsen Naghavi; Tomoko Onoda; Erika Ota; Yuji Otake; Gregory A Roth; Eiko Saito; Takahiro Tabuchi; Yohsuke Takasaki; Tadayuki Tanimura; Manami Uechi; Theo Vos; Haidong Wang; Manami Inoue; Christopher J L Murray; Kenji Shibuya
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Does a modified STarT Back Tool predict outcome with a broader group of musculoskeletal patients than back pain? A secondary analysis of cohort data.

Authors:  J C Hill; E K Afolabi; M Lewis; K M Dunn; E Roddy; D A van der Windt; N E Foster
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  "But it feels swollen!": the frequency and clinical characteristics of people with knee osteoarthritis who report subjective knee swelling in the absence of objective swelling.

Authors:  So Tanaka; Tomohiko Nishigami; Koji Ohishi; Kazutaka Nishikawa; Benedict M Wand; Tasha R Stanton; Hirofumi Yamashita; Akira Mibu; Masami Tokunaga; Takaaki Yoshimoto; Takahiro Ushida
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-11-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.