Literature DB >> 33568814

A decline in emissions of CFC-11 and related chemicals from eastern China.

Sunyoung Park1, Luke M Western2, Takuya Saito3, Alison L Redington4, Stephan Henne5, Xuekun Fang6,7, Ronald G Prinn8, Alistair J Manning4, Stephen A Montzka9, Paul J Fraser10, Anita L Ganesan11, Christina M Harth12, Jooil Kim12, Paul B Krummel10, Qing Liang13, Jens Mühle12, Simon O'Doherty14, Hyeri Park1, Mi-Kyung Park15, Stefan Reimann5, Peter K Salameh12, Ray F Weiss12, Matthew Rigby16.   

Abstract

Emissions of ozone-depleting substances, including trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11), have decreased since the mid-1980s in response to the Montreal Protocol1,2. In recent years, an unexpected increase in CFC-11 emissions beginning in 2013 has been reported, with much of the global rise attributed to emissions from eastern China3,4. Here we use high-frequency atmospheric mole fraction observations from Gosan, South Korea and Hateruma, Japan, together with atmospheric chemical transport-model simulations, to investigate regional CFC-11 emissions from eastern China. We find that CFC-11 emissions returned to pre-2013 levels in 2019 (5.0 ± 1.0 gigagrams per year in 2019, compared to 7.2 ± 1.5 gigagrams per year for 2008-2012, ±1 standard deviation), decreasing by 10 ± 3 gigagrams per year since 2014-2017. Furthermore, we find that in this region, carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12) emissions-potentially associated with CFC-11 production-were higher than expected after 2013 and then declined one to two years before the CFC-11 emissions reduction. This suggests that CFC-11 production occurred in eastern China after the mandated global phase-out, and that there was a subsequent decline in production during 2017-2018. We estimate that the amount of the CFC-11 bank (the amount of CFC-11 produced, but not yet emitted) in eastern China is up to 112 gigagrams larger in 2019 compared to pre-2013 levels, probably as a result of recent production. Nevertheless, it seems that any substantial delay in ozone-layer recovery has been avoided, perhaps owing to timely reporting3,4 and subsequent action by industry and government in China5,6.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33568814     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03277-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  4 in total

1.  Illegal CFC emissions have stopped since scientists raised alarm.

Authors:  Jeff Tollefson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Huge gaps in detection networks plague emissions monitoring.

Authors:  Ray F Weiss; A R Ravishankara; Paul A Newman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Emissions of Tetrafluoromethane (CF4) and Hexafluoroethane (C2F6) From East Asia: 2008 to 2019.

Authors:  Jooil Kim; Rona Thompson; Hyeri Park; Stephanie Bogle; Jens Mühle; Mi-Kyung Park; Yeaseul Kim; Christina M Harth; Peter K Salameh; Roland Schmidt; Deborah Ottinger; Sunyoung Park; Ray F Weiss
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 5.217

4.  Rapid increase in dichloromethane emissions from China inferred through atmospheric observations.

Authors:  Minde An; Luke M Western; Daniel Say; Liqu Chen; Tom Claxton; Anita L Ganesan; Ryan Hossaini; Paul B Krummel; Alistair J Manning; Jens Mühle; Simon O'Doherty; Ronald G Prinn; Ray F Weiss; Dickon Young; Jianxin Hu; Bo Yao; Matthew Rigby
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.